Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:00:07.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fossils from Middle Bunter Pebbles Collected in Birmingham

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Archie Lamont
Archie Lamont
Affiliation:
Grant Institute of Geology, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The most representative series of fossiliferous pebbles from the Birmingham district is that in the Evans Collection, which was acquired by the National Museum of Wales in 1937 and catalogued under the numbers 37.110 GR 1–316. For the loan of this collection I am indebted to Dr. F. J. North, and material for comparison from other collections was obtained from Dr. C. J. Stubblefield, Miss J. R. Harding, and Professor L. J. Wills, who has also corrected the typescript.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , February 1946 , pp. 39 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bigot, A., 1888. Note sur les Homalonotus des Grès siluriens de Normandie. Bull. Soc. géol. France, Ser. 3e, xvi, 419–435, pls. v–vii.Google Scholar
Bigot, A., 1890. Note sur quelques Pélécypodes des grés siluriens de l’Ouest de la France. Bull. Soc. géol. France. Ser. 3e, xvii, 791–801, pls. xxii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Bonney, T. G., 1880. Note on the Pebbles in the Bunter Beds of Staffordshire. Geol. Mag., xvii, 404–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, T. G., 1883. Second Note on the Pebbles in the Bunter Beds of Staffordshire. Geol. Mag., xx, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, J., 1887. The Trentham Gravel Beds and their Leadings. Trans. North Staffs. Nat. Field Club, xxi, 58–60.Google Scholar
Brodie, P. B., 1866 a. Remarks on the Drift in part of Warwickshire, and on the Evidence of Glacial Action which it affords. Brit. Ass. Rept. (Birmingham, 1865), Sectional Transactions, p. 49.Google Scholar
Brodie, P. B., 1866 b. On the Drift in a part of Warwickshire, and on the evidence of Glacial action which it affords. Proc. Warwickshire Nat. and Archaeol. Field Club, 14–32.Google Scholar
Brodie, P. B., 1867. Remarks on the Drift in a part of Warwickshire, and on the evidence of Glacial Action which it affords. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxiii, 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, P. B., 1879. On the Derivation and Distribution of certain Quartzite and other Pebbles in the Drift of Warwickshire. Proc. Warwickshire Nat. and Archaeol. Field Club, 28–39.Google Scholar
Brodie, P. B., 1881. On certain Quartzite and Sandstone Fossiliferous Pebbles in the Drift in Warwickshire, and their probable Identity, lithologically and zoologically, with the true Lower Silurian Pebbles with similar Fossils in the Trias at Budleigh Salterton, Devonshire. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxvii, 430–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, P. B., 1893. Remarks on a Section in supposed Drift at Hillmorton, near Rugby. Proc. Warwickshire Nat. and Archaeol. Field Club, p. 37.Google Scholar
Carpentier, A., 1930. Empreintes recueillies dans le Dévonien moyen et le Dévonien inférieur du Bassin de Dinant (Région occidentale). Bull. Soc. géol. France, Ser. 4, xxx, 653–6, pl. lxix.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1870. Notes on the Brachiopoda hitherto obtained from the “Pebble-Bed” of Budleigh-Salterton, near Exmouth, Devonshire. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxvi, 70–90, pls. iv–vi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T., 1880. On the Species of Brachiopoda that characterize the “Gres Armoricain” of Brittany, together with a few Observations on the Budleigh-Salterton“Pebbles”. Geol. Mag., xvii, 337–343, pl. x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T., 1881. On the Devonian and Silurian Brachiopoda that occur in the Triassic Pebble-bed of Budleigh-Salterton, near Exmouth, in Devonshire. Mon. Brit. Foss. Brachiopoda, Palaeont. Soc., iv, 317–368, pls. xxxviii–xlii.Google Scholar
Edgell, A. Wyatt, 1874. Notes on some Lamellibranchs of the Budleigh-Salterton Pebbles. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxx, 45–9, pls. iv–vi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, W. J., 1882. On the Quartzite Pebbles contained in the Drift, and in the Triassic Strata of England; and on their Derivation from an Ancient Land Barrier in Central England. Proc. Birmingham Phil. Soc., iii, 157–202.Google Scholar
Haughton, S., 1860. On Cyclostigma, a new genus of Fossil Plants from the Old Red Sandstone of Kiltorcan, co. Kilkenny; and on the general law of Phyllotaxis in the Natural Orders—Lycopodiaceae, Equisetaceae, Filices, etc. Journ. R. Dublin. Soc., ii (for 1858–9), 407–420, pls. xiv–xviiGoogle Scholar
Haughton, S., 1860. On Cyclostigma, a new genus of Fossil Plants from the Old Red Sandstone of Kiltorcan, co. Kilkenny; and on the general law of phyllotaxis in the Natural Orders—Lycopodiaceae, Equisetaceae, Filices, ers. reprinted without illustrations in Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 3, v (1860), 433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, A. R., 1895. Budleigh Salterton Pebbles. Geol. Mag., xxxii, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, E., 1885. Ueber einige neue Zweischaler des rheinischen Taunusquart-zits. Jahrb. K. Preuss. geol. Landesanst. und Bergakad. (for 1884), 9–23, pls. ii–iv.Google Scholar
Lamont, A., 1940. Derived Upper Llandovery Fossils in Bunter Pebbles from Cheadle, North Staffordshire. Cement, Lime, and Gravel, xv, 26–30, pls. i–iv.Google Scholar
Maidwell, F. T., 1895. On Some Drift Deposits at Coventry. Proc. Warwicks. Nat. and Archaeol. Field Club, 47–53.Google Scholar
Matley, C. A., 1914. Note on the Source of the Pebbles of the Bunter Pebble-beds of the English Midlands. Geol. Mag., li, 211–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molyneux, W., 1867. On the Gravel Beds of Trentham Park (Summary Account of Lecture to North Staffordshire Naturalists’ Field Club, including a List of Silurian and Carboniferous Fossils by J. W. Salter; reprinted from the Staffordshire Advertiser). Geol. Mag., iv, 173–4.Google Scholar
Molyneux, W., 1869. Burton-on-Trent: its History, its Waters, and its Breweries. Trübner and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
Molyneux, W., 1869. Burton-on-Trent: its History, its Waters, and its Breweries. Whitehurst, Burton-on-Trent.Google Scholar
Molyneux, W., 1877. The Bunter Conglomerates of Cannock Chase. Proc. Dudley and Midland Geol. and Sci. Soc, and Field Club, iii, 139–149.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. M., 1870. On the drift gravel of Lutterworth, Kilworth, etc., Proc Warwicks. Nat. and Archaeol. Field Club, 11–22.Google Scholar
Oehlert, D. -P., 1887. Descriptions de quelques Espèces dévoniennes. Bull. Soc. Etud. sci. d’Angers, 1–47, pls. vi–x.Google Scholar
Peneau, J., 1933. La Faune du Devonien supérieur de l’Ecochère près Ancenis (Loire-Inférieure), Compte rendu Soc. géol. France, no. 3, 33–4.Google Scholar
Pengelly, W., 1878. The Gorran Beds and Budleigh Salterton Pebbles. Geol. Mag., xv, 238–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perceval, S. G., 1878. Orthis redux in Midland Bunter Pebbles. Geol. Mag., xv, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, C., Sharpe, D., and Salter, J. W., 1853. On the Carboniferous and Silurian Formations of the Neighbourhood of Bussaco in Portugal; with Notes and a Description of the Animal Remains, and an Account of the Vegetable Remains. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., ix, 135–161, pls. vii–ix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roualt, , Marie, , 1846. Extrait du Mémoire sur les Trilobites du departemqnt d’llle-et-Vilaine. Bull. Soc. géol. France, Ser. 2e, iv, 309–328, pl. iii and table.Google Scholar
Roualt, , Marie, , 1851. Mémoire sur le terrain paléozoïque des environs de Rennes. Bull. Soc. géol. France, Ser. 2e, viii, 358–396.Google Scholar
Roualt, , Marie, , 1855. Notice sur quelques espéces de fossiles du terrain dévonien du nord du département de la Manche. Bull, Soc. géol. France, Ser. 2e, xii, 1040–5.Google Scholar
Salter, A. E., 1899. On the occurrence of Pebbles of Schorl-rock from the South-West of England in the Drift of Southern and Eastern England. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lv, 220–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, A. E., 1864. Note on the Fossils from the Budleigh Salterton Pebble-Bed. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xx, 286–302.Google Scholar
Shrubsole, O. H., 1903. On the Probable Source of some of the Pebbles of the Triassic Pebble-beds of South Devon and of the Midland Counties. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lix, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. S., 1896. The Origin of Gravel Beds, illustrated in some Local Drifts. Proc. Warwickshire Nat. and Archaeol. Field Club, 15–19.Google Scholar
Tromelin, G. le G., 1876. Étude de la Fauna du Gres silurien de May, Jurques, Campandre, Mont-Robert, etc. (Calvados) avec des Observations sur divers Fossiles paleozoiques de l’Ouest de la France. Bull. Soc. Linn, de Normandie, Ser. 3e, i, 5–80.Google Scholar
Ussher, W. A. E., 1879. On the Triassic Rocks of Normandy and their Environments. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxv, 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verneuil, P. E. de, 1847. Note sur le parallélisme des roches des dépôts paléozoïques de l’Amerique Septentrionale avec ceux de l’Europe, suivie d’un tableau des especes fossiles communes aux deux continents, avec l’indication des étages ou elles se rencontrent, et terminée par un examen critique de chacune de ces espéces. Bull. Soc. géol. France, Ser. 2e, iv, 646–710.Google Scholar
Weiss, E., 1885. Zur Flora der ältesten Schichten des Harzes. Jahrb. K. Preuss. geol. Landesanst. und Bergakad. (for 1884), 148–180, pls. v–vii.Google Scholar