Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
During the course of the John Murray Expedition some 22,000 miles of the floor of the Arabian Sea and the neighbouring areas of the Indian Ocean were mapped by means of the Echosounding apparatus. The region between India and Africa was crossed four times, namely:
(i) from Aden to Karachi,
(ii) from Bombay to Mombasa,
(iii) from Zanzibar to Colombo, and
(iv) from Colombo to Aden,
while more detailed surveys were carried out in the Gulf of Aden, the Gulf of Oman, and the region off Zanzibar.
page 221 note 1 Schmidt, J., Dana's Togt Omkring Jorden, 1928–1930, Copenhagen, 1932, 255, fig. 198.Google Scholar
page 222 note 1 Wüst, G., “Anzeichen von Beziehungen zwischen Bodenstrom und Relief in der Tiefsee des Indischen Ozeans,” Die Naturwissenschafteń, 1934, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 222 note 2 Sewell, R. B. Seymour, “The John Murray Expedition to the Arabian Sea,” Nature, cxxxiii, 1934, 88.Google Scholar
page 223 note 1 Sewell, R. B. Seymour, “The John Murray Expedition to the Arabian Sea,” Nature, cxxxiv, 1934, 686.Google Scholar
page 223 note 2 Medlicott, H. B., and Blanford, W. T., A Manual of the Geology of India, Calcutta, 1879, lxxi.Google Scholar
page 223 note 3 Pilgrim, G. E., Mem. Geol. Sur. India, xxxiv, pt. 4, 1908, 60.Google Scholar
page 223 note 4 Farquharson, W. I., The John Murray Expedition, Scientific Reports, i, 1936, No. 2, 49.Google Scholar
page 225 note 1 Poole, J. H. J., Phil. Mag., xlviii, 1924, 827.Google Scholar
page 225 note 2 Wiseman, J. D. H., Trans. Linn. Soc., Zool., Ser. 2, xix, 1936, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 227 note 1 Heck, N. H., The Geographical Review, xxv, 1935, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 227 note 2 Glennie, E. A., The John Murray Expedition, Scientific Reports, i, 1936, No. 4, 96.Google Scholar
page 229 note 1 Meinesz, F. A. V., Gravity Expeditions at Sea, Delft, 1934, ii, 89.Google Scholar
page 229 note 2 Bullard, E. C, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Series A, ccxxxv, 1936, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 230 note 1 Wadia, D. N., Current Science, iv, 1936, 691.Google Scholar