Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T00:15:55.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First occurrence of a phacopid trilobite faunule from the Upper Devonian of Saoura Valley, Algeria and biodiversity fluctuations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2013

CATHERINE CRÔNIER*
Affiliation:
UMR8217, Géosystèmes, Université Lille 1, Sciences de la Terre, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France
FATIMA ZOHARA MALTI
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Chemistry, Béchar University, BP 417, Béchar 08000, Algeria
ANGELA FRANÇOIS
Affiliation:
UMR8217, Géosystèmes, Université Lille 1, Sciences de la Terre, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France
MADANI BENYOUCEF
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Mascara University Center, BP 305, Mascara 29000, Algeria
DENISE BRICE
Affiliation:
Université Catholique, Faculté Libre des Sciences et Technologies, 41 rue du Port, 59046 Lille cedex, France
*
Author for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Phacopid trilobites are relatively widespread in Devonian deposits of north Gondwana and some have been collected from several sections of the Saoura Valley in SW Algeria. New occurrences of phacopids assigned to Trimerocephalus, Dianops and Phacops sensu lato are described from this area and comparisons are made with closely allied species from Morocco and Europe. The trilobite assemblages of the ‘Argiles de Marhouma’ Formation are considered to be Frasnian–Famennian in age. These new occurrences have been integrated into an analysis of Upper Devonian phacopid biodiversity. Diversity fluctuations reflect environmental changes, bioevents and stratigraphic turnovers throughout the Upper Devonian. Peak diversity was attained after the post-Kellwasser event.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M. & Westrop, S. R. 2000. An empirical assessment of taxic paleobiology. Science 289, 110–12.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1970. Zur Augenreduktion bei devonischen Trilobiten Mit Beschreibung von Nephranops franconicus n. sp. aus dem Oberdevon Ix von Oberfranken. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 41, 145–60.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., Marshall, C. R., Bambach, R. K., Bezusko, K., Foote, M., Fürsich, F. T., Hansen, T. A., Holland, S. M., Ivany, L. C., Jablonski, D., Jacobs, D. K., Jones, D. C., Kosnik, M. A., Lidgard, S., Low, S., Miller, A. I., Novack-Gottshall, P. M., Olszewski, T. D., Patzkowsky, M. E., Raup, D. M., Roy, K., Sepkoski, J. J. JR., Sommers, M. G., Wagner, P. J. & Webber, A. 2001. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 6261–6.Google Scholar
Arbizu, M. 1985. Trilobites Phacopinae de la Formación Vidrieros, en el área de Gildar-Montó (León, NO de España) y su distribución estratigráfica. Trabajos de Geologia, Universidad de Oviedo 15, 6775.Google Scholar
Badgley, C. 2003. The multiple scales of biodiversity. Paleobiology 29, 1113.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1852. Système Silurien du Centre de la Bohème: 1ère partie, Crustacés, Trilobites. Chez l'auteur: Prague, Paris, 1935.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T. 1985. Devonische Ammonoideen aus dem Raum Hohenlimburg-Letmathe (Geologisches Blatt 4611 Hohenlimburg). Dortmunder Beiträge zur Landeskunde, Naturwissenschaftliche Mitteilungen 19, 1934.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T. & Schreiber, G. 1994. Zur Trilobiten - Stratigraphie im Letmather Famennium (nördliches Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Berliner geowissenschaftliche. Abhandlungen (E) 13, 369–87.Google Scholar
Benhamou, M., Abbache, A., Elmi, S., Mekahli, L., Racheboeuf, P., Ouali-Mahadji, A. & Boumendjel, K. 2004. Les calcaires “griottes” et faciès associés du Dévonien supérieur des environs de Beni-Abbes au Djebel Heche (Saoura, Algérie): environnements et implications paléogéographiques. Bulletin du Service Géologique d'Algérie 15, 2749.Google Scholar
Berkowski, B. 1991. A blind phacopid trilobite from the Famennian of the Holy Cross Mountains. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 36, 255–64.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. 1825. Über zwei neue Trilobiten-Arten zum Calymene-Geschlechte gehörig. Zeitschrift für Mineralogie, Taschenbuch 1, 317–21.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1967. Trilobites of the Henryhouse. Formation (Silurian) in Oklahoma. Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 115, 568.Google Scholar
Casier, J.G. 1985. Les ostracodes de la partie supérieure de la formatin de Teferguenite (Givétien) et de la formation de Marhouma (Givétien-Famennien) de la coupe du km 30 (Saoura, Sahara Algérien). Geobios 18, 833–46.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1961. Preliminary report on some new Upper Devonian trilobites from the Moravian karst. Věstník Ústředni ústav Geologický 36, 477–81.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1966. The Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous Trilobites of the Moravian Karst. Sbornik Geologickych Ved 7, 1143.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1971. New phacopid trilobites from the Devonian of Czechoslovakia. Časopis pro Mineralogii a Geologii 16, 255–61.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1977. The phacopid trilobites of the Silurian and Devonian of Czechoslovakia. Vydal Ústředni ústav Geologický 43, 1164.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. 1999. Modalités d'évolution phylétique sous contrôle du milieu chez quelques Phacopinés (Trilobites) néo-Dévoniens. Geobios 32, 187–92.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. 2003. Systematic relationships of the blind phacopine trilobite Trimerocephalus, with a new species from Causses-et-Veyran, Montagne Noire. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48, 113.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. 2008. Morphological relationships within Upper Devonian phacopine trilobite populations from Germany. In International Conference ‘Global alignments of the Lower Devonian Carbonate and Clastic sequences’, IGCP 499 Project/SDS joint field meeting: Contributions of International Conference (eds Kim, A. I., Salimova, F. A. & Meshchankina, N. A.), pp. 22–6. Tashkent: SealMagPress.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. & Clarkson, E. N. K. 2001. Variation of eyes-lens distribution in a new late Devonian phacopid trilobite. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 92, 103–13.Google Scholar
Crônier, C., Bignon, A. & François, A. 2011. Morphological and ontogenetic criteria for defining a trilobite species: the example of Siluro-Devonian Phacopidae. Comptes Rendus Palevol 10, 143–53.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. & Courville, P. 2003. Variations du rythme du développement chez les trilobites Phacopidae néodévoniens. Comptes Rendus Palevol 2, 577–85.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. & Feist, R. 1997. Morphologie et évolution ontogénétique de Trimerocephalus lelievrei nov. sp., premier trilobite phacopidé aveugle du Famennien nord-africain. Geobios (Mémoire Spécial) 20, 161–70.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. & Feist, R. 2000. Evolution et systématique du groupe Cryphops (Trilobita, Phacopinae) du Dévonien supérieur. Senckenbergiana lethaea 79, 501–15.Google Scholar
Crônier, C., Feist, R. & Auffray, J.-C. 2004. Variation in the eye of Acuticryphops (Phacopina, Trilobita) and its evolutionary significance: a biometric and morphometric approach. Paleobiology 30, 471–81.Google Scholar
Crônier, C. & van Viersen, A. 2007. Trilobite palaeobiodiversity during the Devonian in the Ardennes Massif. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 178, 473–83.Google Scholar
Delo, D. M. 1935. A revision of the phacopid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology 9, 402–26.Google Scholar
Drevermann, F. 1901. Die Fauna der oberdevonischen Tuffbreccie von Langenaubach bei Haiger. Jahrbuch der Preußischen Geologischen, Landesanstalt 1900, 99–207.Google Scholar
Drevermann, F. 1902. Über eine Vertretung der Etroeungt-Stufe auf der rechten Rheinseite. Zeitschrift der Geologischen Gesellschaft 54, 480524.Google Scholar
Emmrich, H. F. 1839. De Trilobitis: dissertatio petrefactologica quam consensu et auctoritate amplissimi philosophorum ordinis in alma litterarum universitate Friderica Guilelma pro summis in philisophia honoribus/Hermanus Frider Emmerich. Thesis, Philos-Univ, Friderica Guilelma, Berlin. Published thesis.Google Scholar
Emmrich, H. F. 1844. Zur naturgeschichte der Trilobiten. Realschul-Programm, Meiningen.Google Scholar
Farsan, N. M. 1998. Das Etroeungtium (Ober-Devon VI, Strunium) und die letzen Phacopinae (Trilobita) im westlichen Zentral- und West-Afghanistan. Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv Beiheft 21, 1737.Google Scholar
Feist, R. 1995. Effect of poedomorphosis in eye reduction on patterns of evolution and extinction in trilobites. In Evolutionary Change and Heterochrony (ed. McNamara, K. J.), pp. 225–44. Chichester, New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Feist, R. & Becker, T. 1997. Discovery of Famennian trilobites in Australia (Late Devonian, Canning Basing, NW Australia). Geobios (Mémoire special) 20, 231–42.Google Scholar
Feist, R. & Clarkson, E. N. K. 1989. Environmentally controlled phyletic evolution, blindness and extinction in Late Devonian tropidocoryphine trilobites. Lethaia 22, 359–73.Google Scholar
Feist, R., McNamara, K. J., Crônier, C. & Lerosey-Aubril, R. 2009. Patterns of extinction and recovery of phacopid trilobites during the Frasnian-Famennian (Late Devonian) mass extinction event, Canning Basin, Western Australia. Geological Magazine 146, 1233.Google Scholar
Feist, R. & Schindler, E. 1994. Trilobites during the Frasnian Kellwasser Crisis in European Late Devonian cephalopod limestones. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 169, 195–23.Google Scholar
Feist, R., Yasdi, M. & Becker, R.T. 2003. Famennian trilobites from the Shotori Range, E. Iran. Annales de la Societé Géologique du Nord 10, 285–95.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2000. Origination and Extinction Components of Taxonomic Diversity: General Problems. Paleobiology (Suppl.) 26, 74102.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1892. Die Karnischen Alpen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Girard, C., Klapper, G. & Feist, R. 2005. Subdivision of the terminal Frasnian linguiformis Conodont Zone, revision of the correlative interval of Montagne Noire Zone 13, and discussion of stratigraphically significant associated trilobites. In Understanding Late Devonian and Permian-Triassic Biotic and Climatic Events: Towards an Integrated Approach (eds Over, J. R., Morrow, J. R. & Wignall, P. B.), pp. 181198. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gürich, G. 1896. Das Paläozoicum im polnische Mittlegebirge. Verhandlungen der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft (Ser. II) 32, 1539.Google Scholar
Green, J. 1832. Synopsis of the trilobites of North America, in which some new genera and species are proposed. Monthly American Journal of Geology 1, 558–60.Google Scholar
Hahn, G. & Hahn, R. 1975. Die Trilobiten des Ober-Devon, Karbon und Perm. Leitfossilien 1, 1127.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø. & Harper, D. A. T. 2006. Paleontological Data Analysis. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, 19.Google Scholar
Haug, E. 1903. Sur deux horizons à céphalopodes du Dévonien supérieur dans le Sahara oranais. Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 137, 83–5.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. & Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Abhandlungen der königlischen böhemischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 5, 1176.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1985. Correlation of mid-Palaeozoic ammonoid evolutionary events with global sedimentary perturbations. Nature 313, 1722.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G. 1970. Taghanic onlap and the end of North American Devonian provinciality. Geological Society of America, Bulletin 81, 2077–105.Google Scholar
Kaiser, S. I., Becker, R. T. & El Hassani, A. 2007. Middle to late Famennian successions at Ain Jemaa (Moroccan Meseta). Implications for regional correlation, event stratigraphy and synsedimentary tectonics of NW Gondwana. In Devonian Events and Correlations (eds Becker, R. T. & Kirchgasser, W. T.), pp. 237–60. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 278.Google Scholar
Kayser, E. 1889. Über einige neue oder wenig gekannte Versteinerungen des rheinischen Devons. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 41, 288–96.Google Scholar
Lerosey-Aubril, R. & Feist, R. 2012. Quantitative approach of diversity and decline in late Palaeozoic trilobites. In Earth and Life: Global Biodiversity, Extinction Intervals and Biogeographic Perturbations through Time (ed. Talent, J. A.), pp. 535–55. Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
Levitsky, E. C. 1974. Razvitie verchnedevonskich predstavitelej roda Phacops Emmrich, 1839 (S. L.). Izvcst. Vyshikh učeb. Zaved, Geologia i Razvedka 8, 2431.Google Scholar
Lütke, F. 1968. Trilobiten aus dem Oberdevon des Südwest-Harzes-Stratigraphie, Biotop und Systematik. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 49,119–91.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1955. Trilobity srednego i verchnego devona Urala i severnych Mugodzar . Internal report. Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Geologicheskii Institut Trudy, n. S., 3, 1263 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1960. Paleontologitscheskoje obosnovanije stratigrafii paleozoja rudnogo Altaja. VII. Devonskije i Kamenougolnye trilobity rudnogo Altaja. Moscow: Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-issledovatel'skii Geologicheskogo Instituta, 123 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1969. Trilobites. In Field Atlas of the Silurian, Devonian, and Early Carboniferous Fauna of the Soviet Far East (ed. Modzalevskoy, E.A.). Moscow: Nedra, 137–49.Google Scholar
Matern, H. 1927. Mitteilungen über die Oberdevon-Fauna der Dill-Mulde. I. Die oberdevonischen Trilobiten des Scheldetals. Senckenbergiana 9, 252–60.Google Scholar
McCoy, F. 1849. On the classification of some Bristish fossil Crustacea, with notices of new forms in the University Collection at Cambridge. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. II) 4, 161–69, 330–5, 392414.Google Scholar
McKellar, R. C & Chatterton, B. D. E. 2009. Early and Middle Devonian Phacopidae (Trilobita) of southern Morocco. Palaeontographica Canadiana 28, 1114.Google Scholar
Menchikoff, N. 1930. Recherches géologiques et morphologiques dans le Nord du Sahara occidental. Revue de Géographie Physique et de Géologie Dynamique 3, 103247.Google Scholar
Morzadec, P. & Babin, C. 1976. Présence de Trimerocephalus caecus (Gürich, 1896) (Trilobita, Phacopidae) dans le Famennien inférieur du Finistère: intérêt stratigraphique et paléogéographique. Geobios 9, 367–71.Google Scholar
Münster, G. G. 1840. Die Versteinerungen des Uebergangskalkes mit Clymenien und Orthoceratiten von Oberfranken. Beiträge zur Petrefakten-Kunde, III, Heft 7, 33121.Google Scholar
Osmólska, H. 1958. Famennian Phacopidae from the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 3, 119–48.Google Scholar
Osmólska, H. 1963. On some Famennian Phacopinae (Trilobita) from the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 8, 495523.Google Scholar
Ouali Mehadji, A., Bendella, M., Atif, K., Belkacemi, K. & Abbache, A. 2012. Estimation de l'épaisseur réelle et des environnements de dépôts d'âge Famennien (Dévonien supérieur) de la région de Marhouma (Saoura, Sahara Nord-Ouest, Algérie). Bulletin du Service Géologique National 23, 327.Google Scholar
Paeckelmann, W. 1913. Das Oberdevon des Bergischen Landes. Abhandlungen der Preußischen Geologischen, Landesanstalt 70, 1356.Google Scholar
Perna, A. 1915. Upper Devonian trilobites from the environs of the town Vierkhnie-Uralsk. Mémoires du Comité Géologique, Nouvelle Série, Petrograd 138, 156.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, von H. 1954. Der Bohlen bei Saalfeld/Thür. Beiheft zur Zeitschrift, Geologie 11, 1105.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, von H. 1959. Neue Beobachtungen und Funde aus dem Saalfelder Oberdevon. Geologie 8, 262–79.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1841. Figures and descriptions of the Palaeozoic Fossils of Cornwall, Devon, and West Somerset. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Richter, Rh. 1848. Beitrag zur Paläontologie des Thüringer Waldes. Die Grauwacke des Bohlens und des Pfaffenbergs bei Saalfeld. I. Fauna. Dresden, Leipzig: Arnoldische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Richter, Rh. 1856. Beitrag zur Paläontologie des Thüringer Waldes. Erster Theil. Denkschrift der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Classe, Wien 11, 87138.Google Scholar
Richter, Rd. & Richter, E. 1919. Über Phacops laevis Münster und andere Phacopiden des vogtländischen Oberdevons. Senckenbergiana 1, 131140.Google Scholar
Richter, Rd. & Richter, E. 1923. Systematik und Stratigraphie der Oberdevon-Trilobiten des Ostthüringischen Schiefergebirges. Senckenbergiana 5, 5976.Google Scholar
Richter, Rd. & Richter, E. 1926. Die Trilobiten des Oberdevons. Beiträge zur Kenntnis devonischer Trilobiten IV. Abhandlungen der Preußischen Geologischen, Landesanstalt 99, 1314.Google Scholar
Richter, Rd. & Richter, E. 1933. Die letzten Phacopidae. Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique 9, 119.Google Scholar
Richter, Rd. & Richter, E. 1939. Trilobiten aus dem Bosporus-Gebiet. Abhandlungen der Preußischen Geologischen, Landesanstalt 190, 149.Google Scholar
Richter, Rd. & Richter, E. 1943. Trilobiten aus dem Devon von Marokko mit einem Anhang über Arten des Rheinlands. Senckenbergiana 26, 116–99.Google Scholar
Richter, Rd. & Richter, E. 1955. 2. Phylogenie der oberdevonischen Phacopidae. Senckenbergiana lethaea 36, 4972.Google Scholar
Roemer, F. A. 1866. Beiträge zur geologischen Kenntnis des nordwestlichen Harzgebirges. Fünfte Abtheilung. Palaeontographica 13, 201–35.Google Scholar
Schindler, E. 1990. The Late Frasnian (Upper Devonian) Kellwasser Crisis. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 30, 151–59.Google Scholar
Schlager, W. 1981. The paradox of drowned reefs and carbonate platforms. Geological Society of America, Bulletin 92, 197211.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 2001. Large-scale heterogeneity of the fossil record: implications for Phanerozoic biodiversity studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 356, 351–67.Google Scholar
Struve, W. 1976. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Phacopina (Trilobita), 9: Phacops (Omegops) n. sg. (Trilobita; Ober-Devon). Senckenbergiana lethaea 56, 429–51.Google Scholar
Struve, W. 1989. Rabienops evae aus dem Späten Ober-Devon des Rheinischen Gebirges. Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie 98, 335–42.Google Scholar
Termier, G. & Termier, H. 1950. Paléontologie marocaine. II. Invertébrés de l'Ere Primaire. Fascicule III. Annélides, Arthropodes, Echinodermes, Conularides et Graptolithes. Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc 79, 1282.Google Scholar
Thomas, I. 1909. Notes on the trilobite fauna of Devon and Cornwall. The Geological Magazine (New series, Decade V) 6, 193204.Google Scholar
Walliser, O. H. 1985. Natural boundaries and Commission boundaries in the Devonian. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 75, 401–08.Google Scholar
Weber, V. 1937. Trilobity kamennougol'nych i permskich otlozheniy SSSR. I. Kamennougol'nye trilobity. Monografii Russkoe Paleontologizeskoe Obstschestwo 71, 1160.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1908. Die Cephalopodenfauna des höheren Oberdevon am Enkenberg. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 26, 565635.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1911. Klassifikation der Phacopiden. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 63, 317–36.Google Scholar
Wendt, J., Kaufmann, B., Belka, Z., Klug, C. & Lubeseder, S. 2006. Sedimentary evolution of a Palaeozoic bain and ridge system: the Middle and Upper Devonian of the Ahnet and Mouydir (Algerian Sahara). Geological Magazine 143, 269–99.Google Scholar
Xiang, L. 1981. Some Late Devonian trilobites of China. Geological Society of America (Special Paper) 187, 183–91.Google Scholar
Yuan, J-L. & Xiang, L-W. 1998. Trilobite fauna at the Devonian–Carboniferous boundary in South China (S-Guizhou and N-Guangxi). Bulletin of the National Museum of Natural Science (Special Publication) 8, 1281.Google Scholar
Zhu, Z. L. 1988. Trilobites. In Devonian-Carboniferous Boundary in Nanbiancun, Guilin, China - Aspects and Records (ed. Yu, C. M.), pp. 199208. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar