Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:04:56.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fabiana Silvestri (Foraminiferida) from India, with notes on its global distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Bimal K. Samanta
Bimal K. Samanta
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Calcutta University, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Calcutta-700019, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fabiania Silvestri, a morphologically distinctive larger foraminifer, is circum-global in distribution and is reported to be almost equally abundant in the three marine Tertiary provinces, Tethyan, Indo-Pacific and Caribbean-American. The genus is reported to range from Upper Palaeocene to the top of the Eocene. During the mid-late Eocene Fabiania seems to have been represented by three species, F. cassis (Oppenheim), F. cubensis (Cole & Bermudez) and F. saipanensis Cole. In the Indian subcontinent it is known only from eastern India, where it is represented by F. cassis and F. saipanensis. F. indica Nagappa is here regarded as a junior synonym of F. saipanensis Cole. F. cassis is reported for the first time from India. In eastern India, Fabiania is found to be restricted to the middle to upper part of the Middle Eocene.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 119 , Issue 3 , May 1982 , pp. 257 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. G. 1965. The Forminifera and stratigraphy of the Melinau Limestone, Sarawak, and its importance in Tertiary correlation. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 121, 283–338, pls 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, C. G. 1967. Tertiary Foraminifera in the Tethyan, American, and Indo-Pacific Provinces. In Aspects of Tethyan Biogeography (ed. Adams, & Ager, ), pp. 195–217. Syst. Assoc. Publ. No. 7, London.Google Scholar
Adams, C. G. 1970. A reconsideration of the East Indian Letter classification of the Tertiary. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 19 (3), 85–137.Google Scholar
Adams, C. G. 1973. Some Tertiary foraminifera. In Atlas of Palaeobiogeography (ed. Hallam, ), pp. 453–68. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Aubouin, J. & Neumann, M. 1959. Contribution à l'étude statigraphique et micropaléontologique de l'Éocène en Grèce. Revue Micropaléont. 2(1), 31–49, pls 1–5.Google Scholar
Bermudez, P. J. 1949. Tertiary smaller Foraminifera of the Dominican Republic. Cushman Lab. foram. Res. Spec. Publ. 25, 1–322, pls 1–26.Google Scholar
Bermudez, P. J. & Gamez, H. A. 1966. Estudio Paleontologico de una seccion del Eoceno, Grupo Punta Carnero de la Isla Margarita, Venezuela Mem. Soc. Cienc. Nat. 26, 205–59.Google Scholar
Bignot, G. 1968. Nouvelle découverte de Fabiania cassis (Oppenheim) dans le Lutétien du Bassin de Paris, Mém. Bur. Res. Géol. Min. 58, 79–82, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Blondeau, A., Bodelle, J., Campredon, R., Lanteaume, M. & Neumann, M. 1968. Répartition stratigraphique des grands foraminifères de l'Èocène dans les Alpes-Maritimes (Franco-italiennes) et les Basses-Alpes. Mém. Bur. Res. Géol. Min. 58, 11–26, pls 1–2.Google Scholar
Boulanger, D. & Neumann, M. 1965. A propos des genres Angotia Cuvillier 1963 et Fabiania Silvestri 1926. Revue Micropaléont. 7(4), 228–31, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Bozorgnia, F. 1964. Microfacies and microorganisms of Paleozoic through Tertiary sediments of some parts of Iran. Tehran: National Iranian Oil Company.Google Scholar
Butterlin, J. 1954. La géologie de la République d'Haiti et ses rapports avec celle des régions voisines. Mém. Inst. fr. Haiti, 1.Google Scholar
Butterlin, J. 1966. Macroforaminifères de l'Éocène de Colombie. Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr. 7(8), 627–9, pl. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, W. S. 1941. Stratigraphic and paleontologic studies of wells in Florida. Florida geol. Surv. Bull. 19, 1–91, 18 pls.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. 1942. Stratigraphic and paleontologic studies of wells in Florida. Florida geol. Surv. Bull. 20, 1–89, 16 pls.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. 1952. Eocene and Oligocene larger Foraminifera from the Panama Canal Zone and vicinity. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 244, 1–41, pls 1–28.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. 1957(a). Larger Foraminifera [of Saipan]. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 280–I, 321–60, pls 94–118.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. 1957(b). Larger Foraminifera from Eniwetok drill holes. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 260-V, 743–84, pls 230–49.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. 1960. Problems of the geographic and stratigraphic distribution of certain Tertiary larger Foraminifera. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 2nd ser. (geol.) spec. vol. 4, 9–18.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. 1963. Tertiary larger Foraminifera from Guam. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 403-E, E1–E28, pls 1–11.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. & Bermudez, P. J. 1944. New foraminiferal genera from the Cuban Middle Eocene. Bull. Am. Paleont. 28, 331–51, pls 27–9.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. & Bermudez, P. J. 1947. Eocene Discocyclinidae and other foraminifera from Cuba. Bull. Am. Paleont. 31, 189–225, pls 14–20.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S. & Bridge, J. 1953. Geology and larger Foraminifera of Saipan Island. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 253, 1–45, pls 1–15.Google Scholar
Curry, D. 1960. Eocene limestones to the west of Jersey Geol. Mag. 97, 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J. A. 1927. An outline of a re-classification of the Foraminifera. Contr. Cushman Lab. Foram. Res. 3, 1–105, pls 1–21.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A. 1948. Foraminifera, their Classification and Economic Use, 4th edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J. A. & Bermudez, P. J. 1936. Additional new species of foraminifera and a new genus from the Eocene of Cuba. Contr. Cushman Lab. Foram. Res. 12, 55–63, pls 10–11.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A. & Ponton, G. M. 1933. A new genus of the Foraminifera, Gunteria from the Middle Eocene of Florida Contr. Cushman Lab. Foram. Res. 9, 25–30.Google Scholar
Cuvillier, J. 1963. Angotia aquitanica, Foraminifère nouveau du Luténtien d'Aquitaine. Revue Micropaléont. 5, 223–5.Google Scholar
Deloffre, R. & Hamaoui, M. 1973. Révision des Chapmaninidae et Cymbaloporidae Angotia et Fabiania (Foraminifères). Bull. Centre Rech. Pau, 7(2), 291–335, pls 1–11.Google Scholar
Dizer, A. 1961. Le genre Fabiania et quelques autres foraminifères l'accompagnant dans le nummulitique de Kizilcahaman (NW Ankara). Revue Micropaléont. 4, 80–4, pls 1–2.Google Scholar
Eames, F. E. 1971. Tertiary Faunas, 2nd edition. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Hanzawa, S. 1957. Cenozoic Foraminifera of micronesia. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 66, 1–163, pls 1–38.Google Scholar
Hanzawa, S. 1959. The foraminiferal species Fabiania cassis (Oppen heim) in Japan. Contr. Cushman Fdn. Foram. Res. 10, 119–22, pl. 9.Google Scholar
Keijzer, F. G. 1945. Outline of the geology of the eastern part of the Province of Oriente, Cuba (E. of 76° W.I.) with notes on the geology of other parts of the island. Utrecht Univ. geogr. geol. Meded, physiogr.-geol. Reeks. Ser. 2, No. 6, 1–239.Google Scholar
Küpper, K. 1955. Eocene larger Foraminifera near Guadalupe, Santa Clara County, California. Contr. Cushman Lab. Foram. Res. 6, 133–9, pl. 19.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr & Tappan, H. 1964. Sarcodina, chiefly ‘Thecamoebians’ and Foraminiferida. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part C, Protista 2 (ed. Moore, ). New York: Geol. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
Nagappa, Y. 1956. Foraminifera of the genera Fabiania and Eorupertia from the Sylhet Limestone of Assam. J. Palaeont. Soc. India, 1, 191–8, pls 30–1.Google Scholar
Nagappa, Y. 1959. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Cretaceous-Eocene succession in the India-Pakistan-Burma region. Micropaleontology 5, 145–92, pls 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, M. & Boulanger, D. 1955. Le genre Fabiania. Répartition stratigraphique et géographique en Aquitaine. Bull. Soc. géol. Fr. (Sr. 6), 5, 305–9, pl. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, P. 1896. Das Alttertiär der Colli Berici in Venetien, die Stellung der Schichten von Priabona, und die oligocäne transgression in alpinen Europa Zeitsch. deutsch. geol. Gesellsch. 48, 27–152.Google Scholar
Reiss, Z. 1963. Reclassification of perforate Foraminifera. Bull. geol. Surv. Israel, 35, 1–111, pls 1–8.Google Scholar
Routhier, P. 1953. Étude géologique du versant occidental de la Nouvelle-Calédonie entre le col de Boghen et la pointe d'Arama. Mém. Soc. géol. Fr. 32.Google Scholar
Samanta, B. K. 1964. The occurrence of Indo-Pacific Discocyclina in eastern India Micropaleontology 10, 339–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanta, B. K. 1968. The Eocene succession of Garo Hills, Assam, India Geol. Mag. 105, 124–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanta, B. K. 1969. Eocene planktonic foraminifera from the Garo Hills, Assam, India Micro-paleontology 15, 325–50.Google Scholar
Samanta, B. K. 1970. Upper Eocene planktonic foraminifera from the Kopili Formation, Mikir Hills, Assam, India Contr. Cushman Fdn Foram. Res. 21, 28–39.Google Scholar
Samanta, B. K. 1971. Early Tertiary stratigraphy of the area around Garampani, Mikir-North Cachar Hills, Assam J. geol. Soc. India 12, 318–27.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R. 1964. Bemerkungen zur Foraminiferen-Gattung Angotia Cuviller 1963 N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh. 4. 193–6.Google Scholar
Schweighauser, J. 1953. Mikropaläontologische und stratigraphische Untersuchungen im Paleocaen und Eocaen des Vicentin (Norditalien) mit besonderer Berucksiettigung des Discocyclinen und Asterocyclinen. Abh. pal. Schweiz. 70, 1–97, pls 1–13.Google Scholar
Silvestri, A. 1926. Sulla Patella cassis Oppenheim Riv. Ital. paleont. 32, 15–22.Google Scholar
Zilahy, V. 1966. A Planorbulinidae, Acervulinidae és Cymbaloporidae Család a Magyarországi Eocénben. M. Földtani intézet évi Jelentése az 1966 évröl. 154–77.Google Scholar