Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:28:49.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The elevation of the Lower Greensand ridge, south-east England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. J. Chorley
R. J. Chorley
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Downing Place, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The influence of three classes of factors—geological structure, lithologic composition and spatial control over erosion—are examined by trend-surface analysis, followed by stepwise regression, in order to determine their relative importance in explaining the variation observed in the elevation of the Lower Greensand ridge of south-east England. It is concluded that structural controls are dominant, lithological controls very subordinate and the spatial control of very marginal significance.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 106 , Issue 3 , 04 June 1969 , pp. 231 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chatwin, C. P. 1948. British Regional Geology: East Anglia and Adjoining Areas. 2nd ed., Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Chorley, R. J. 1959. The geomorphic significance of some Oxford soils. Am. J. Sci., 257, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorley, R. J. 1964 a. An analysis of the areal distribution of soil size facies in the Lower Greensand rocks of east-central England by the use of trend surface analysis. Geol. Mag., 101, 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorley, R. J. 1964 b. Geomorphological evaluation of factors controlling shearing resistance of surface soils in sandstone. J. geophys. Res., 69, 1507–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorley, R. J. 1966. The application of statistical methods to geomorphology. In Dury, G. H., (Ed.), Essays in Geomorphology. Heinemann, London. p. 275–387.Google Scholar
Cowper Reed, F. R. 1897. A Handbook to the Geology of Cambridgeshire. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, W. M. 1895. The development of certain English rivers. Geog. J., 5, 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, K. R. & Whitten, E. H. T. 1962. Quantitative mineralogical composition and variation of the Lacorne, La Motte, and Preissac granitic complex, Quebec, Canada. J. Petrology, 3, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, C. S. 1956. Surficial geology and geomorphology of Potter County, Pennsylvania. Prof. Pap. U.S. geological Survey 288.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J., (Ed.), 1965. BMD Biomedical Computer Programs. Health Science Computing Facility, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Edmonds, E. A. & Dinham, C. H. 1965. Geology of the Country around Huntingdon and Biggleswade: Sheets 187 and 204, New Series; Mem. geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Flint, R. F. 1963. Altitude, lithology, and the Fall Zone in Connecticut. J. Geol., 71, 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, J. T. 1960. Interpretation of erosional topography in humid temperate regions. Am. J. Sci., 258–A (Bradley Volume), 80–97.Google Scholar
Hey, R. W. & Perrin, R. M. S. 1960. The Geology and Soils of Cambridgeshire. Cambridge Natural History Society.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, S. E., Taylor, J. H. & Kellaway, G. A. 1944. Large-scale superficial structures in the Northampton ironstone field. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond., 100, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, R. E. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull. geol. Soc. Am., 56, 275–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W. 1931. Stream Sculpture on the Atlantic Slope. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkaldy, J. F. 1939. The history of the Lower Cretaceous Period in England. Proc. Geol. Ass. Lond., 50, 379–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, M. J. 1967. Measurement and theory of soil creep. J. Geol., 75, 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, M. J. & Chorley, R. J. 1967. Throughflow, overland flow and erosion. Bull. Int. Ass. Sci. Hydrol., Year 12 (3), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesley, J. P. 1856. Manual of Coal and its Topography. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Marr, J. E. & Shipley, A. E. 1904. Handbook to the Natural History of Cambridgeshire. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melton, M. A. 1957. An analysis of the relations among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology. Office Naval Res., Proj. 389–042, Tech. Rept. 11, Department of Geology, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Merriam, D. F. & Sneath, P. H. A. 1966. Quantitative comparison of contour maps. J. geophys. Res., 71, 1105–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. L. 1964. Comparison-analysis of trend maps. Stanford Univ. Pub. Geol. Sci., 9 (2), 669–685.Google Scholar
Mirchink, M. F. & Bukhartsev, V. P. 1959. The possibility of a statistical study of structural correlations. Dokl. Earth Science Sect., English Trans., 126 (5), 1062–1065.Google Scholar
Narayan, J. 1963. Cross-stratification and palaeogeography of the Lower Greensand of south-east England and Bas-Boulonnais, France. Nature, Lond., 199, 1246–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastall, R. H. 1909. Cambridgeshire, Bedfordshire and West Norfolk. Chapter 5 of Geology in the Field, ed. Monckton, H. W. & Herries, R. S.. Jubilee Volume of the Geological Association, Stanford, London.Google Scholar
Rastall, R. H. 1919. The mineral composition of the Lower Greensand strata of eastern England. Geol. Mag., 56, 211–220 and 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastall, R. H. 1925. The tectonics of the southern Midlands. Geol. Mag., 62, 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastall, R. H. 1927. The underground structure of eastern England. Geol. Mag., 64, 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, J. N. 1967. Correlation between surfaces by spectral methods. In Merriam, D. F. & Cocke, N. C., (Eds.). Computer Applications in the Earth Sciences: Colloquium on Trend Analysis, Kansas State Geological Survey Computer Contribution 12, 31–37.Google Scholar
Rich, J. L. 1911. Gravel as a resistant rock. J. Geol., 19, 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A. H., Lindberg, J. B. & Brinkman, L. W. 1961. A correlation and regression analysis applied to rural farm population densities in the Great Plains. Ann. Ass. Am. Geog., 51, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A. H. 1962. Mapping the correspondence of isarithmic maps. Ann. Ass. Am. Geog., 52, 414–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A. H. & Caroe, L. 1967. On the analysis and comparison of statistical surfaces. In Garrison, W. L. & Marble, D. F. (Eds.), Quantitative Geography, Part 1, North-western University Studies in Geography, No. 13, 252–276.Google Scholar
Schwarzacher, W. 1953. Cross-bedding and grain size in the Lower Cretaceous sands of East Anglia. Geol. Mag., 90, 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, B. W. 1957. The evolution of the relief of the Cam valley. Geog. J., 123, 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamp, L. D. 1923. An Introduction to Stratigraphy. Murby, London.Google Scholar
Whitaker, W. (Ed.). 1891. The geology of parts of Cambridgeshire and of Suffolk. Memoirs of the Geological Survey. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Whitten, E. H. T. 1962. A new method for determination of the average composition of a granite massif. Geochim. cosmoch. Acta, 26, 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, E. H. T. 1963. A surface-fitting program suitable for testing geological models which involve areally distributed data. Tech. Rept. No. 2, ONR Task No. 389–135, Contract Nonr 1228 (26), Office of Naval Research, Geography Branch, Northwestern University, Evanston, 111.Google Scholar
Woodland, A. W. 1942–1946. Water supply from underground sources. Geol. Surv. of Great Britain.Google Scholar
Woodland, A. W. Wartime Pamphlet No. 4 (The Oxford–Northampton District). General Discussion (April, 1942); Part IV, Well catalogues for NS one-inch sheets 201, 202 and 203 (November, 1942); Part V, Well catalogues for NS one-inch sheets 218, 219 and 220 (March, 1943); Part VI, Well catalogues for NS one-inch sheets 236, 237 and 238 (September, 1942).Google Scholar
Woodland, A. W. Wartime Pamphlet No. 20 (The Cambridge–Ipswich District). Part I, Well catalogues for NS one-inch sheets, 172, 187 and 204 (December, 1942); Part II, Well catalogues for NS one-inch sheets 173, 188 and 205 (February 1943); Part X, General Discussion (April, 1946).Google Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. & Linton, D. L. 1955. Structure, Surface and Drainage in south-east England. 2nd Edn. Philip, London.Google Scholar
Yatsu, E. 1966. Rock Control in Geomorphology. Lozosha, Tokyo.Google Scholar