Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:44:15.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Precambrian mafic dykes in western Shandong province, North China Craton: constraints on the chronology, genetic model and tectonic significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2023

Shen Liu Open the ORCID record for Shen Liu [Opens in a new window] ,
Caixia Feng ,
Guangying Feng ,
Yan Fan  and
Zhuang Guo
Shen Liu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics and Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
Caixia Feng
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics and Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
Guangying Feng
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
Yan Fan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics and Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
Zhuang Guo
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics and Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
*
Author for correspondence: Shen Liu, Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Late Neoarchaean, the lithosphere of the North China Craton (NCC) experienced a strong extensional event, which is of great significance for understanding the evolution of the continental crust in the Precambrian. In this study, a suite of mafic dykes from Shandong province in the northeastern NCC were investigated to determine the nature, timing and source of rift-related magma activities using zircon U–Pb data, whole-rock geochemistry and Nd–Hf isotopes. Zircon U–Pb dating of four dolerites by laser ablation – inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) yielded weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb ages in the range 2509 ± 6.1 to 2537 ± 6.2 Ma (2σ, 95 % confidence interval). The mafic dykes are classified as alkaline rocks based on their K2O + Na2O contents (6.78–7.21 wt %) and belong to the shoshonitic series according to their K2O contents (3.23–3.36 wt %). The dolerites show low concentrations of light rare earth elements ((La/Yb)N between 7.17 and 8.55), positive Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* between 1.12 and 1.27), positive Ba, K, Pb, Sr, Eu, Dy and Lu anomalies, and depleted U, Nb, Pr, Ta, P, Nd and Ti anomalies. The dykes are characterized by low initial (87Sr/86Sr)i (∼0.6969), positive εNd(t) values (0.2–0.8) and εHf(t) values (0.5–8.6) and relatively old mean Nd and Hf model age (2.73 Ga). Collectively, the data suggest that the mafic dykes were derived from the partial melting (10–20 %) of an isotope-depleted garnet–lherzolite mantle source that was hybridized through interaction with subducted lower crustal material. The parental magmas of these dykes underwent a certain number of crustal contaminations during magma ascent. The mafic magmatism represented in the form of the dyke swarms is considered to be a response to widespread lithospheric extension which affected the NCC at c. 2.5 Ga during the Neoarchaean.

Keywords

Neoarchaeanmafic dykeszircon geochronologygeochemical modellingNCC
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 160 , Issue 6 , June 2023 , pp. 1041 - 1064
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

The North China Craton (NCC) was formed by welding several Archaean micro-continents along a marine closed greenstone belt (Zhai & Santosh, Reference Zhai and Santosh2011; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Santosh, Collins and Teng2016; Tang & Santosh, Reference Tang and Santosh2017; Yang & Santosh, Reference Yang and Santosh2017). A large number of ∼2.5 Ga rock units were preserved in the NCC (Wu et al. Reference Wu, Geng, Shen, Wang, Liu and Song1998; Zhai & Bian, Reference Zhai and Bian2000; Zhai, Reference Zhai2010). The NCC covers a vast area of eastern China (Wu et al. Reference Wu, Xu, Gao and Zheng2008), which includes two ancient continental cores of c. 3.8 Ga age (Jahn & Bai, Reference Jahn and Bai1983; Huang et al. Reference Huang, Bi and DePaolo1986; Liu, Reference Liu1991; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Nutman, Compston, Wu and Shen1992, Reference Liu, Nutman, Williams, Compston, Wu and Shen1994; Song et al. Reference Song, Allen, Liu and Wu1996; LQ Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qiu, McNaughton, Groves, Luo, Huang, Miao and Liu1998; Zheng et al. Reference Zheng, Griffin and O’Reilly2004; Gao et al. Reference Gao, Zhao, Wang, Zhao, Ma and Yang2005; Shen et al. Reference Shen, Geng, Song and Wan2005; Wan et al. Reference Wan, Liu and Song2005; Geng et al. Reference Geng, Yang, Wang, Ren, Du and Zhou2007; HL Wang et al. Reference Wang, Chen, Sun, Liu, Xu, Chen, Zhang and Diwu2007; Diwu et al. Reference Diwu, Sun, Yuan, Wang, Zhong and Liu2008; Chen et al. Reference Chen, Diwu and Wang2009; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Liu, Wang, Liu and Dai2009). The NCC was finally cratonized in the Late Palaeoproterozoic, thus recording a complex Precambrian evolution history. All crustal fragments gathered in the unified NCC were merged into the Columbia supercontinent (Santosh, Reference Santosh2010; Zhao & Zhai, Reference Zhao and Zhai2013). In addition, the NCC underwent an extensional regime between 2.5 and 2.45 Ga (Zhai & Peng, Reference Zhai and Peng2007), leading to basement uplift, formation of rift-related troughs, and major anorogenic magmatism represented by the emplacement of granitoid suites (e.g. Song et al. Reference Song, Allen, Liu and Wu1996) and mafic dykes. The events related to the emplacement of the mafic dykes can provide important information about the formation and evolution of the early crust. To date, more than 100 Proterozoic (<2.5 Ga) mafic dykes have been found in the NCC including those in the Hebei, Shanxi and Shandong area with ages ranging from 800  to 600 Ma, 820 Ma, 900 Ma, 925 Ma, 1.78 Ga and 2.4  to 1.6 Ga. They have been widely studied (Li et al. Reference Li, He and Qian1997; Zhai & Bian, Reference Zhai and Bian2000; Peng et al. Reference Peng, Zhai, Zhang and Guo2005, Reference Peng, Zhai, Guo, Kusky and Zhao2007, Reference Peng, Zhai, Li, Wu and Hou2008, Reference Peng, Guo, Zhai and Bleeker2010, Reference Peng, Bleeker, Ernst, Söderlund and McNicoll2011 a, b; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Liu and Li2006; Peng, Reference Peng2010; Hou, Reference Hou2012; Li, Reference Li2014). Nevertheless, only a few investigations of the Archaean mafic dykes (>2.5 Ga) have been carried out in the NCC.

At present, the western part of Shandong province has been the focus of several studies related to the Early Precambrian evolutionary history of the NCC (Hou, Reference Hou2012). Approximately 95 % of the Early Precambrian crystalline basement in western Shandong is dominated by granulites, greenstones, Trondhjemite-Tonalite-Granodiorite (TTG) gneisses, gneissic monzogranite, dioritic to granodioritic intrusions, and mafic dyke swarms (Wang, Reference Wang1990; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Li, Lin and Qian2004; Ju et al. Reference Ju, Hou and Zhang2014). In addition, the TTG series rocks and gneissic monzogranites in this area have been divided into two stages (2.5–2.6 Ga, 2.45–2.56 Ga; Jahn, Reference Jahn1988; Wang, Reference Wang1991, Reference Wang1993). The mafic dykes in western Shandong province are generally NE–SW-trending and are mainly located in the Tai’an, Laiwu and Mengyin regions (Hou, Reference Hou2012).

Herein, we present new zircon 207Pb/206Pb ages, and petrological, whole-rock geochemical and Nd–Hf isotopic data on the mafic dykes studied from western Shandong province, northeastern NCC. Our results constrain the emplacement ages and the origin of the dykes and provide insights into the tectonic significance of the NCC during the Neoarchaean.

2. Geological setting and petrography

As a part of the Sino-Korean Craton, the Precambrian crustal evolution history of the NCC and the extensive Mesozoic redemption events have attracted global attention (Griffin, Reference Griffin1992; Griffin et al. Reference Griffin, Zhang, O’Reilly, Ryan, Flower, Chung, Lo and Lee1998; O’Reilly et al. Reference O’Reilly, Griffin, Poudjom Djomani and Morgan2001; Xu, Reference Xu2001; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Sun, Zhou, Zhou, Fan and Zheng2003; Zhai & Santosh, Reference Zhai and Santosh2011, Reference Zhai and Santosh2013; Zhao & Zhai, Reference Zhao and Zhai2013; Deng et al. Reference Deng, Wang and Li2017; Li & Santosh, Reference Li and Santosh2017). The NCC is bounded by the Early Palaeozoic Qilianshan Orogen to the west, the Late Palaeozoic Tianshan – Inner Mongolia – Daxinganling Orogen of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt to the north and the Mesozoic Qinling–Dabie–Sulu high/ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic belt to the south (Zhao, Reference Zhao2013).

According to the structural subdivision view of the NCC, it is composed of two north–south-trending Palaeoproterozoic (1.85 Ga) eastern and western crustal blocks welded across the North China Orogenic Belt (Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Wilde, Cawood and Sun2001, Reference Zhao, Sun, Wilde and Li2005; Wilde et al. Reference Wilde, Zhao and Sun2002; Guo et al. Reference Guo, Sun, Chen and Zhai2005). The Eastern Block experienced obvious lithospheric thinning in the Late Mesozoic, and it contains many world-class gold deposits (Goldfarb & Santosh, Reference Goldfarb and Santosh2014; Li & Santosh, Reference Li and Santosh2017). It separates the Longgang Block from the Langlin Block and retains the oldest continental crust of the NCC (Fig. 1; Li et al. Reference Li, Zhao, Sun, Han, Zhao and Hao2006, Reference Li, Zhao, Santosh, Liu, Lai, Suo, Song and Wang2012; Li & Zhao, Reference Li and Zhao2007; Luo et al. Reference Luo, Sun, Zhao, Ayers, Li, Xia and Zhang2008; Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Zhao, Wei, Geng and Sun2008; Tam et al. Reference Tam, Zhao, Liu, Zhou, Sun and Li2011, Reference Tam, Zhao, Sun, Li, Iizukac, Ma, Yin, He and Wu2012 a, b, c; Dan et al. Reference Dan, Li, Guo, Liu and Wang2012, Reference Dan, Li, Wang, Wang and Liu2014; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Gong, Yu and Li2013). The Western Block has thick lithospheric roots across Shanxi, Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia and Northern Gansu provinces. It has become the most stable part of the NCC (Santosh, Reference Santosh2010). It is a collage of the Northern Yinshan and Southern Ordos Blocks along the Inner Mongolia Suture Zone, merging the Palaeoproterozoic Khondalite Belt (Fig. 1; Xia et al. Reference Xia, Sun, Zhao, Wu, Xu and Zhang2008; Yin et al. Reference Yin, Zhao, Sun, Xia, Wei, Zhou and Leung2009, Reference Yin, Zhao, Guo, Sun, Zhou, Zhang, Xia and Liu2011; Santosh, Reference Santosh2010; Li et al. Reference Li, Yang, Zhao, Grapes and Guo2011; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Li, Chu and Zhao2011; Dan et al. Reference Dan, Li, Guo, Liu and Wang2012, Reference Dan, Li, Wang, Wang and Liu2014; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Gong, Yu and Li2013; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Santosh, Collins and Teng2016). The southern and northern edges of the NCC are marked by the Indosinian Qinling Dabie and Hercynian Yinshan Yanshan Orogenic Belts. Its western edge borders Helan Qilian Orogenic Belt, and its eastern edge is located in Korea. The NCC is composed of uniform Precambrian crystalline basement, which is covered by younger overburden (Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Wilde, Cawood and Sun2001) and invaded by the Precambrian and Mesozoic mafic dyke swarms (e.g. Li et al. Reference Li, He and Qian1997; Zhai and Bian, Reference Zhai and Bian2000; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Li, Lin and Qian2004, Reference Hou, Liu and Li2006; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Hu, Zhao and Feng2004, Reference Liu, Hu, Zhao, Feng, Zhong, Cao and Shi2005, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Feng and Coulson2008 a, b, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Yu, Feng, Qi, Wang and Coulson2009, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Coulson, Feng, Qi, Yang, Yang and Tang2012 a, b, Reference Liu, Feng, Jahn, Hu, Gao, Feng, Lai, Yang, Qi and Coulson2013 b; Peng et al. Reference Peng, Zhai, Zhang and Guo2005, Reference Peng, Zhai, Guo, Kusky and Zhao2007, Reference Peng, Zhai, Li, Wu and Hou2008, Reference Peng, Guo, Zhai and Bleeker2010, Reference Peng, Bleeker, Ernst, Söderlund and McNicoll2011 a, b; Peng, Reference Peng2010; Hou, Reference Hou2012). Another model suggests that the NCC is composed of several Archaean micro-continental blocks and these blocks have been proliferated into large continental fragments (Zhai & Bian, Reference Zhai and Bian2000; Zhao, Reference Zhao2009; Zhai & Santosh, Reference Zhai and Santosh2011; Dan et al. Reference Dan, Li, Guo, Liu and Wang2012, Reference Dan, Li, Wang, Wang and Liu2014; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Gong, Yu and Li2013; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Santosh, Collins and Teng2016; Yang & Santosh, Reference Yang and Santosh2017).

Fig. 1. (a) Location of the study area within the northeastern NCC. (b) Geological map of the study area, showing the distribution of mafic dykes studied and the location of samples collected during this study.

The fresh near-vertical mafic dykes in the study area are NE–SW-trending and intruded into luxiwu well in northeast North Carolina. The Early and Middle Proterozoic strata in the Mawangyu and Zhujiayu areas (Tables 1–5) have dykes extending from 3.0 to 9.0 km and a width range of 25–1.0 m. The rock types include gabbro, dolerite and diabase porphyry. Wujing dykes phenocrysts (WJA1–8, WJB1–8) include medium-grained clinopyroxene (2.5–6.5 mm) and tabular plagioclase (2.0–5.5 mm), and the matrix is composed of clinopyroxene (0.04–0.05 mm), plagioclase (0.03–0.06 mm), a small amount of magnetite (0.02–0.03 mm), secondary chlorite (0.03–0.05 mm) and auxiliary zircon composition (Fig. 1). The dyke phenocrysts of Mawangyu and Zhujiayu (MWY1–7, ZJY1–7) include medium-sized clinopyroxene (2.5–5.0 mm) and tabular plagioclase (2.0–5.0 mm), and the matrix consists of clinopyroxene (0.04–0.06 mm), plagioclase (0.03–0.05 mm), secondary magnetite with auxiliary zircon and apatite (0.02–0.03 mm) and secondary chlorite (0.04–0.06 mm) (Figs 1, 2).

Table 1. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U–Pb isotope data for the mafic dykes studied within western Shandong province, northeastern NCC

Table 2. Major element concentrations (wt %) for the mafic dykes studied. LOI = loss on ignition; Mg# = 100Mg/(Mg + Fe) in atomic proportions; RV = recommended values; MV=measured values. Values for GSR-1 and GSR-3 are from Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Gao, Han and Wang2003)

Table 3. Trace element compositions (ppm) of the mafic dykes studied. RV = recommended values; MV = measured values. Values for GBPG-1 and OU-6 are from Thompson et al. (Reference Thompson, Potts, Kane and Wilson2000) and Potts and Kane (Reference Potts and Kane2005), respectively.

Table 4. Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of the mafic dykes studied. The compositions were calculated using Chondrite Uniform Reservoir values and decay constants of λ Rb = 1.42 × 10–11 year–1 (Steiger & Jäger, Reference Steiger and Jäger1977) and λ Sm = 6.54 × 10–12 year–1 (Lugmair & Harti, Reference Lugmair and Harti1978)

Table 5. Hf isotopic compositions of representative samples studied in western Shandong province

Fig. 2. The field and microscopic photos of the mafic dykes studied. Pl – plagioclase; Cpx – clinopyroxene.

3. Sampling and analytical techniques

Thirty samples were collected from the mafic dykes (Fig. 1). Zircon grains were separated from four samples (WJA1, WJB3, MWY2 and ZJY1) using conventional heavy liquid and magnetic techniques at the Langfang Regional Geological Survey, Hebei province, China. After separation and mounting, the morphology and internal structure of the zircons were imaged using transmitted and reflected light and by cathodoluminescence (CL) techniques at the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics (SKLCD), Northwest University, Xi’an (Fig. 3). Prior to zircon U–Pb dating, grain mount surfaces were washed in dilute HNO3 and pure alcohol to remove any potential lead contamination. Zircon U–Pb and 207Pb/206Pb weighted average ages were determined by LA-ICP-MS (Table 1; Fig. 4) using an Agilent 7500a ICP-MS instrument equipped with a 193 nm excimer laser at the SKLCD. The zircon standard 91500 was used for quality control, and a NIST 610 standard was used for data optimization. A spot diameter of 24 μm was used during analysis, employing the methodologies described by Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Hu, Zong, Gao, Gao, Xu and Chen2010 a). Common Pb correction was undertaken following the approach of Andersen (Reference Andersen2002), and the resulting data were processed using GLITTER and ISOPLOT (Ludwig, Reference Ludwig2003; Table 1; Fig. 4). Uncertainties on individual LA-ICP-MS analyses are quoted at the 95 % (1σ) confidence level.

Fig. 3. Representative CL images of zircon grains from samples from the mafic dykes studied.

Fig. 4. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U–Pb concordia diagrams and the 207Pb/206Pb weighted mean ages from the mafic dykes studied.

In situ zircon Hf isotope analysis was performed on Nu plasma Human Resource (HR) MC-ICP-MS equipped with a geolas 2005 193 nm ArF excimer laser ablation system. Analyses were carried out using a spot size of 44 μm, and He was used as the carrier gas. The laser repetition rate is 10 Hz and the energy density applied is between 15 and 20 J cm−2. During the analysis, the 176Hf/177Hf ratio of the standard zircon (91500) was 0.282295 ± 0.000027 (n = 14; 2σ), which is in good agreement with the recommended 176Hf/177Hf ratios within 2σ (0.282308 ± 58, 2σ; 0.282015 ± 0.000029, 2σ) (Griffin et al. Reference Griffin, Pearson, Belousova and Saeed2006; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Walker, Yang, Yuan and Yang2006). All the above analysis was performed at the SKLCD.

Whole-rock chemistry was completed at the State Key Laboratory of Deposit Geochemistry (SKLDG, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province), Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Using a molten glass disc, the analytical accuracy was better than 5 % according to Chinese national standard GSR-3 (Table 2). Loss on ignition was obtained using 1 g powder heated up to 1100 °C for 1 h. Trace element analysis was performed with an ELAN 6000 ICP-MS at the SKLDG, following procedures described by Qi et al. (Reference Qi, Hu and Grégoire2000). The discrepancy between triplicate analyses is less than 5 % for all elements. Analyses of international standards OU-6 and GBPG-1 are in good agreement with recommended values (Table 3). During Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopic analysis, the sample powder was added with mixed isotopic tracer and dissolved in a polytetrafluoroethylene capsule with HF + HNO3 (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Sun, Lu, Zhou, Zhou, Liu and Zhang2001). Isotopic measurements were performed using a Finnigan Triton Ti thermal ionization mass spectrometer at the SKLDG. Procedural blanks yielded concentrations of <200 pg for Sm and Nd and <500 pg for Rb and Sr, and mass fractionation corrections for Sr–Nd isotopic ratios were based on 86Sr/88Sr = 0.1194 and 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219, respectively. Analysis of the NBS987 and La Jolla standards yielded values of 87Sr/86Sr = 0.710246 ± 16 (2σ), and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.511863 ± 8 (2σ), respectively.

4. Results

4.a. Zircon U–Pb ages

Euhedral zircons in samples WJA1, WJB3, MWY2 and ZJY1 are clean and prismatic and show clear oscillatory magmatic zoning (Fig. 3). Twenty-three zircon grains from sample WJA1 yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 2523 ± 7.7 Ma (1σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4a) and weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb age of 2538 ± 3.2 Ma (2σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4e). Twenty-five zircon grains from sample WJB3 yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 2509 ± 7.7 Ma (1σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4b), and weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb age of 2510 ± 6.1 Ma (2σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4f). Twenty-five zircon grains from sample MWY2 yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 2512 ± 12 Ma (1σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4c) and weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb age of 2509 ± 6.2 Ma (2σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4g). Twenty-four zircon grains from sample ZJY1 yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 2539 ± 6.5 Ma (1σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4d) and weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb age of 2537 ± 6.2 Ma (2σ, 95 % confidence interval; Table 1; Fig. 4h). These age data provide the best estimates of the crystallization ages of dykes (207Pb/206Pb weighted average c. 2.5 Ga) within the study area. No major zircon inheritance was observed in any of the samples.

4.b. Major and trace element geochemistry

The dykes studied appear quite evolved and show SiO2 (52.11–52.36 wt %), TiO2 (0.26–0.37 wt %), Al2O3 (20.25–20.68 wt %), Fe2O3 (8.34–8.86 wt %), MnO (0.18–0.26 wt %), MgO (4.03–4.38 wt %), CaO (5.52–5.76 wt %), Na2O (3.55–3.93 wt %), K2O (3.23–3.36 wt %) and P2O5 (0.25–0.38 wt %) (Table 2). All the dykes studied are classified as alkaline (shoshonites) on the total-alkali silica diagram (Figs. 5a and 6) and as shoshonites in a Na2O vs K2O diagram (Figs. 5b and 6). They are characterized by enrichment in (La/Sm)N (1.57–2.57) and depletion in (Dy/Yb)N (1.30–1.42), with a variation range in (La/Yb)N (7.17–8.55), and the Eu/Eu* ratios appears slightly positive (1.12–1.27) (Table 3; Figs. 7 and 8a, b, modified based on comments). Furthermore, the mafic dykes are enriched in Ba, K, Pb, Sr, Eu, Dy and Lu; with negative U, Nb, Ta, Pr, P, Nd and Ti anomalies in primitive-mantle-normalized multi-element variation diagrams (Figs. 7 and 8a, b).

Fig. 5. Classification of the mafic dykes studied. (a) Total-alkali silica (Middlemost, Reference Middlemost1994; Le Maitre, Reference Le Maitre2002) using major element concentrations recalculated to 100 % volatile-free compositions. (b) variations in K2O vs Na2O concentrations (Menzies & Kyle, Reference Menzies, Kyle and Menzies1972).

Fig. 6. Variations in major element concentrations vs MgO ( wt %) for the mafic dykes studied.

Fig. 7. Variations in trace element concentrations vs MgO ( wt %) for the mafic dykes studied.

Fig. 8. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE and (b) primitive-mantle-normalized multi-element variation diagrams for the mafic dykes studied. Concentrations are normalized to chondrite composition of Sun and McDonough (Reference Sun, McDonough, Saunders and Norry1989).

4.c. Whole-rock Sr–Nd and zircon Hf isotopes

The Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of 16 representative dykes were determined (Table 4; Fig. 9). They have a relatively narrow range of (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios (∼0.6969) and have positive ϵ Nd(t) values (0.2–0.8), implying an isotope-depleted magma source. The mean Nd model age is 2.73 Ga (DePaolo, Reference DePaolo1981). The initial isotopic values of Sr are lower than those of BABI (Basaltic Achondrite Best Initial) (0.69899), for two main reasons (1) at least two mantle end elements (depleted mantle and enriched mantle) are involved in the genetic process (Zhou & Armstrong, Reference Zhou and Armstrong1982; Zhi, Reference Zhi1990; Zou et al., Reference Zou, Zindler, Xu and Qi2000); (2) high melting depth, homogeneity of source area and difference in lithosphere thickness (Niu et al., Reference Niu, Wilson, Humphreys and O’Hara2011; Ye et al., Reference Ye, Lambert, Grimwood, Roczo-Farkas, Nimmo, Sloots, Kirkwood and Whiley2015). The Hf isotopic compositions of zircon from the mafic dykes were also determined (Table 5; Fig. 10). Twenty spot analyses were obtained for sample WJA1, yielding ε Hf(t) values (−2.8 to 4.8) corresponding to T DM1 model ages (2.98–2.65 Ga, mean T DM1 = 2.75 Ga). Eighteen spot analyses were obtained for sample WJB3, and the results show ε Hf(t) values (−0.5 to 5.5) corresponding to T DM1 model ages (2.8–2.61 Ga, mean T DM1 = 2.73 Ga). Eighteen spot analyses were obtained for sample MWY2, yielding a range of ε Hf (t) values (−1.7 to 8.6) corresponding to T DM1 model ages (2.88–2.49 Ga, mean T DM1 = 2.70 Ga). Eighteen spot analyses in zircon grains from sample ZJY2 show ε Hf(t) values (−1.4 to 8.2) corresponding to T DM1 model ages (2.9–2.53 Ga, mean T DM1 = 2.71 Ga). The mean T DM1 of the four zircons is 2.73 Ga, which is similar to the Nd model age.

Fig. 9. Variations in initial 87Sr/86Sr vs ϵ Nd(t) values for the mafic dykes studied. The field delineates the composition of Proterozoic mafic dykes within the NCC (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Feng, Jahn, Hu, Gao, Feng, Lai, Yang, Qi and Coulson2013 b). The mafic dykes analysed during this study plot within the isotope-depleted mantle source field.

Fig. 10. Plots of zircon ages vs ϵ Hf(t) values for the mafic dykes studied.

5. Discussion

Based on zircon geochronology, whole-rock geochemistry and Nd–Hf isotopic evidence, this study reasonably limits the source area of mafic dykes, crustal contamination, fractional crystallization and magmatic evolution.

5.a. Mantle source and the origin

The mafic dykes studied are quite evolved, and the SiO2 content is quite high (52.11–52.36 wt %; Table 2), implying an ultra-basic source for these rocks. An ultra-basic source is also supported by the relatively high Mg# values (52–56; Table 1). It is unlikely that the magma that formed these dykes had any contribution from crustal rocks (Hirajima et al. Reference Hirajima, Ishiwatari, Cong, Zhang, Banno and Nozaka1990; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Meng and Lai1995; Kato et al. Reference Kato, Nami and Zhai1997; Rapp et al. Reference Rapp, Shimizu and Norman2003), as lower crustal intermediate granulites (Gao et al. Reference Gao, Luo, Zhang, Zhang, Han, Zhao and Hu1998 a, b) would produce high-Si and low-Mg# melts. Moreover, the Zr/Nb (10–16) and Rb/Sr ratios (0.04–0.20) of the dykes studied (Table 3) suggest magma derivation from a depleted mantle source (Weaver, Reference Weaver1991). The dykes also show positive but variable ϵ Nd(t) (0.2–0.8; Table 4) and ϵ Hf (t) values (0.5–8.6), both of which are consistent with derivation from an isotope-depleted mantle (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Yu, Feng, Qi, Wang and Coulson2009). In addition to the evidence outlined above, plots La/Sm vs La, and Sm/Yb vs Sm (Fig. 11a, b) suggest that the magma was sourced from an isotope-depleted garnet–lherzolite mantle through a moderate degree of partial melting (10–20 %). And during the diagenetic process, the separation crystallization mainly occurs with clinopyroxene (Fig. 12). In primitive-mantle-normalized spider plots (Fig. 8b), all the dykes studied show distinct negative anomalies for Nb and Ta, indicating the involvement of crustal components in the mantle source (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Sun, Zhou and Ying2005). The depleted mantle source can be further supported by the zircons from mafic dykes studied, because zircons are obviously recycled and should come from the fusion of depleted mantle sources.

Fig. 11. Variations in La vs La/Sm and Sm vs Sm/Yb of the mafic dykes studied.

Fig. 12. The correlative plots MgO vs SiO2 (a) and Cr vs Ni (b) for the mafic dykes studied.

5.b. Crustal contamination

Crustal pollution can lead to the enrichment of Sr–Nd isotopic composition of the basaltic rocks (Guo et al. Reference Guo, Fan, Wang and Li2004). The positive K, Pb and Zr, negative Nb, Ta and Ti anomalies, low Nb/Ta ratios (3.36–4.88; average 4.18) and relatively uniform La/Nb and higher Ba/Nb ratios (3.5–6.0, 94–466) (Table 3) suggest the contribution of a mantle source related to or contaminated by subducted material (Fig. 8a, b; Guo et al. Reference Guo, Guo, Wang, Fan, Li, Zhao, Li and Li2013). Although the dolerites studied had a small Sr isotopic composition (∼0.6969) and positive ϵ Nd(t) and ϵ Hf(t) values (0.2–0.8, 0.5–8.6, except for a few samples), the possibility that the genetic process is affected by crustal contamination cannot be ruled out. In the related diagrams of Nb/Ta vs La/Yb, Ce/Nb vs Th/Nb, Th/Nb vs Ta/Yb and La/Nb vs Ce/Pb (not shown), there are obvious projection laws of the mafic dyke swarms studied, further implying that the genetic process was affected by obvious crustal contamination. The low Ce/Pb (1.64–6.22) and Nb/U ratios (4.38–10.2) and higher La/Nb (1.28–1.65), Zr/Nb (9.97–15.9) and Rb/Nb ratios (2.61–12.3) also imply this. Crustal contamination would result in significant variation in Sr and Nd isotope compositions. Although there is no obvious correlation between MgO and (87Sr/86Sr)i, positive correlations between MgO and ε Nd(t) values are obvious from the dykes studied (Fig. 8b; Taylor & McLennan, Reference Taylor and McLennan1985). Therefore, there was clearly crustal contamination during the formation of these dykesThe mafic dykes are characterized by depletion in Th relative to La (Fig. 8b), eliminating the possibility of significant upper-middle crustal contamination (Taylor & McLennan, Reference Taylor and McLennan1985). A likely candidate for the contamination might be lower crust.

5.c. Genetic model and tectonic significance

The mafic dykes studied provide possible evidence for the extension of Neoarchaean lithosphere and the evolution of the lower mantle beneath the NCC. Herein, we propose a genetic model of the dykes studied and the tectonic significance.

Geochemical characteristics show that the parent magma forming the mafic dykes comes from the melting of an isotope-depleted garnet lherzolite mantle (10–20 %). However, all the dykes have significant negative high-field-strength elements (HFSE; e.g. Nb, Ta, P and Ti) and positive Pb and K anomalies in the normalized multi-element plots compared to the original mantle (Table 3; Fig. 8a, b). In general, HFSE deficiency (i.e. Nb, Ta) is interpreted as rutile fractionation (Table 3; Fig. 8b; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Sun, Zhou and Ying2005). In addition, the positive anomaly of Pb and K is considered to be the result of mixing and metasomatism of fluids from subducted oceanic plates in the mantle source region (Nelson, Reference Nelson1992; Rogers & Setterfle, Reference Rogers and Setterfle1994; Chung et al. Reference Chung, Wang and Crawford2001; Muller et al. Reference Muller, Franz, Herzig and Hunt2001).

The high Ba/Nb ratios (51–215; Table 3) of these dykes are different from most intraplate volcanic rocks (i.e. ocean island basalt, alkaline basalt and kimberlite), and their Ba/Nb ratios are very low (from 1.0 to 20; Jahn et al. Reference Jahn, Wu, Lo and Tsai1999). Therefore, the above data suggest that the mantle-derived magma that generated these has assimilated possible crustal contamination.

Many processes related to plume-related magmatism and mantle chemical heterogeneity (Arndt & Goldstein, Reference Arndt and Goldstein1989; Kay & Kay, Reference Kay and Kay1991; Rudnick & Fountain, Reference Rudnick and Fountain1995; Jull & Kelemen, Reference Jull and Kelemen2001; Gao et al. Reference Gao, Rudnick, Yuan, Liu, Liu, Xu, Ling, Ayers, Wang and Wang2004; Elkins-Tanton, Reference Elkins-Tanton, Foulger, Natland, Presnall and Anderson2005; Lustrino, Reference Lustrino2005; Anderson, Reference Anderson2006) are closely related to the subsidence of continental lower crust to convective mantle. As eclogite has higher density than peridotite of lithospheric mantle (Rudnick & Fountain, Reference Rudnick and Fountain1995; Jull & Kelemen, Reference Jull and Kelemen2001; Anderson, Reference Anderson2006; Levander et al. Reference Levander, Niu, Lee and Cheng2006), eclogite material will be easier to recycle into the mantle (Arndt & Goldstein, Reference Arndt and Goldstein1989; Kay & Kay, Reference Kay and Kay1991; Jull & Kelemen, Reference Jull and Kelemen2001; Gao et al. Reference Gao, Rudnick, Yuan, Liu, Liu, Xu, Ling, Ayers, Wang and Wang2004, Reference Gao, Rudnick, Xu, Yuan, Liu, Walker, Puchtel, Liu, Huang, Wang and Yang2008). Moreover, if the eclogite is silicon-saturated, it can hybridize with the overlying mantle peridotite and produce olivine-free pyroxene. The subsequent melting of these pyroxenes in the mantle can produce basaltic magma (Kogiso et al. Reference Kogiso, Hirschmann and Frost2003; Sobolev et al. Reference Sobolev, Hofmann, Sobolev and Nikogosian2005, Reference Sobolev, Hofmann, Kuzmin, Yaxley, Arndt, Chung, Danyushevsky, Elliott, Frey, Garcia, Gurenko, Kamenetsky, Kerr, Krivolutskaya, Matvienkov, Nikogosian, Rocholl, Sigurdsson, Sushchevskaya and Teklay2007; Herzberg et al. Reference Herzberg, Asimow, Arndt, Niu, Lesher, Fitton, Cheadle and Saunders2007; Gao et al. Reference Gao, Rudnick, Xu, Yuan, Liu, Walker, Puchtel, Liu, Huang, Wang and Yang2008). Therefore, this model has been used to explain the origin of the mafic dyke parent magmas in the NCC (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Feng and Coulson2008 a, b, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Yu, Feng, Qi, Wang and Coulson2009, Reference Liu, Feng, Jahn, Hu, Gao, Feng, Lai, Yang, Qi and Coulson2013 b).

In general, mafic dyke swarms can provide significant scientific information for the time and stage of extensional tectonics, and are ideal objects for studying mantle plume activity and lithospheric extension (Hou, Reference Hou2012). Previous studies in the NCC focused on Mesozoic, Cenozoic and Proterozoic mafic dykes and documented three episodes of lithospheric extension during the Proterozoic (i.e. from 1.8  to 1.6 Ga, 1.3  to 1.2 Ga, and 0.8  to 0.7 Ga). Nevertheless, study of the extension of NCC Archaean (age > 2.5 Ga) lithosphere is still very weak (Chen & Shi, Reference Chen and Shi1983, Reference Chen, Shi and Qian1994; Chen et al. Reference Chen, Shi and Jia1992; Shao & Zhang, Reference Shao and Zhang2002; Zhang & Sun, Reference Zhang and Sun2002; Peng et al. Reference Peng, Zhai, Zhang and Guo2005, Reference Peng, Zhai, Guo, Kusky and Zhao2007, Reference Peng, Zhai, Li, Wu and Hou2008, Reference Peng, Guo, Zhai and Bleeker2010, Reference Peng, Bleeker, Ernst, Söderlund and McNicoll2011 a, b; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Liu and Li2006; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Wu, Wilde and Liu2007; Li et al. Reference Li, Zhai, Peng, Chen and Guo2010; Peng, Reference Peng2010). The age data and genetic model in this paper are of considerable significance for basaltic magma activities in the lower crust related to the extension of the Archaean lithosphere. It has been suggested that the large-scale continental accretion and Archaean cratonization (2.5–2.6 Ga) occurred in the southwest and northeast of present-day Shandong province (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhuang and Xu1999; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Li, Lin and Qian2004). Generally, the thickened crust will undergo eclogite, and then sink and recycle back to the underlying mantle (Arndt & Goldstein, Reference Arndt and Goldstein1989; Kay & Kay, Reference Kay and Kay1991; Jull & Kelemen, Reference Jull and Kelemen2001; Gao et al. Reference Gao, Rudnick, Yuan, Liu, Liu, Xu, Ling, Ayers, Wang and Wang2004). The foundered eclogite has a higher density than that of the mantle peridotite (Rudnick & Fountain, Reference Rudnick and Fountain1995; Jull & Kelemen, Reference Jull and Kelemen2001; Anderson, Reference Anderson2006; Levander et al. Reference Levander, Niu, Lee and Cheng2006), but its melting temperature is lower than that of mantle peridotite (Yaxley & Green, Reference Yaxley and Green1998; Rapp et al. Reference Rapp, Shimizu, Norman and Applegate1999; Yaxley, Reference Yaxley2000; Kogiso et al. Reference Kogiso, Hirschmann and Frost2003; Sobolev et al. Reference Sobolev, Hofmann, Sobolev and Nikogosian2005, Reference Sobolev, Hofmann, Kuzmin, Yaxley, Arndt, Chung, Danyushevsky, Elliott, Frey, Garcia, Gurenko, Kamenetsky, Kerr, Krivolutskaya, Matvienkov, Nikogosian, Rocholl, Sigurdsson, Sushchevskaya and Teklay2007). This means that the heating of silicon-saturated eclogite will produce an intermediate acid solution assemblage (from tonalite to trondhjemite), rather than basic solution. These melts can be hybridized with mantle peridotite overlying areas to varying degrees. Subsequently, decompression melting of mixed mantle can produce basaltic melt (Kogiso et al. Reference Kogiso, Hirschmann and Frost2003; Sobolev et al. Reference Sobolev, Hofmann, Sobolev and Nikogosian2005, Reference Sobolev, Hofmann, Kuzmin, Yaxley, Arndt, Chung, Danyushevsky, Elliott, Frey, Garcia, Gurenko, Kamenetsky, Kerr, Krivolutskaya, Matvienkov, Nikogosian, Rocholl, Sigurdsson, Sushchevskaya and Teklay2007; Herzberg et al. Reference Herzberg, Asimow, Arndt, Niu, Lesher, Fitton, Cheadle and Saunders2007; Gao et al. Reference Gao, Rudnick, Xu, Yuan, Liu, Walker, Puchtel, Liu, Huang, Wang and Yang2008). Nevertheless, the lithospheric mantle in western Shandong province is not highly enriched, which may be the result of limited hybridization between the mantle and the subsidence lower crust. Subsequently (∼2.5 Ga), the partial melting of the slightly mixed mantle will produce the parent magma of the dykes studied. These magmas intruded into the Earth’s crust and formed these mafic dykes between ∼2.51 Ga and 2.54 Ga. The layered model is further supported by the geochemical composition, which is similar to that of the igneous rocks derived from the layered dynamic model: enrichment in Ba, K, Pb, Sr and Zr, negative HFSE (Nb, Ta and Ti), (La/Yb)N (7.17–8.55), relatively low ϵ Nd(t) (0.2–0.8) and ϵ Hf(t) ratios (−2.8 to 8.6) (Tables 3–5; Figs 7–9; Wedepohl, Reference Wedepohl1991; Gao et al. Reference Gao, Zhang, Luo, Li and Gao1992; Budnick, Reference Budnick1995; Gao & Jin, Reference Gao and Jin1997; Feng et al. Reference Feng, Liu, Zhong, Feng, Coulson, Qi, Yang and Yang2012; Qi et al. Reference Qi, Hu, Liu, Coulson, Qi, Tian, Feng and Wang2012; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Zou, Hu, Zhao and Feng2006, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Feng and Coulson2008 a, b, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Yu, Feng, Qi, Wang and Coulson2009, Reference Liu, Su, Hu, Feng, Gao, Coulosn, Wang, Feng, Tao and Xia2010 b, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Feng, Coulson, Li, Wang and Qi2010 c, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Zhong, Qi, Wang, Feng and Yang2011, Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng and Tang2012 b, Reference Liu, Feng, Jahn, Hu, Gao, Coulson, Feng, Lai, Yang and Yang2013 a, Reference Liu, Feng, Jahn, Hu, Gao, Coulson, Feng, Lai, Yang and Tang2013 c, Reference Liu, Feng, Jahn, Hu, Zhai and Lai2014, Reference Liu, Feng, Hu, Zhai, Gao, Lai, Yan, Coulson and Zou2015, Reference Liu, Feng, Zhai, Hu and Yan2016, Reference Liu, Feng, Feng, Xu, Coulson, Guo, Guo, Peng and Feng2017, Reference Liu, Feng, Santosh, Feng, Coulson, Xu, Guo, Guo, Peng and Feng2018; Luo et al. Reference Luo, Wei, Xin, Zhang, Ke and Li2006), intense lithosphere thinning (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Hu, Gao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Feng and Coulson2008 a, b), massive contemporaneous magmatic activity (Regional Geology of Shandong Province, 1995) and large-scale mineralization appear in the NCC (Regional Geology of Shandong Province, 1995). All of the above phenomena can be explained by the foundering of lithosphere.

6. Conclusions

  1. 1. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U–Pb dating indicates that the mafic dykes from Shandong province in the northeastern NCC formed between 2509 ± 6.1 and 2537 ± 6.2 Ma, indicative of a Neoarchaean mafic magmatic event.

  2. 2. These mafic dykes are alkaline and shoshonitic. They are characterized by high light rare earth element (LREE) concentrations ((La/Yb)N between 7.17 and 8.55), positive Eu (Eu/Eu* between 1.12 and 1.27), Ba, K, Pb and Sr anomalies, and negative Nb, P, Ta and Ti anomalies. The dykes have low initial (87Sr/86Sr)i values of ∼0.6969, high ϵ Nd(t) (0.2–0.8) and ϵ Hf(t) values (0.5–8.6, except for a few samples). They were likely derived from melting (10–20 %) of an isotope-depleted garnet–lherzolite mantle that was hybridized by foundered lower crustal material.

  3. 3. The mantle-derived parent magma of the basic vein in the study area was affected by crustal pollution to a certain extent during the magma ascent.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Most Special Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41373028, 41573022) and Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Basic Research Program Project (2023-JC-ZD-16). The authors thank Honglin Yuan and Liang Qi for assistance during zircon Hf isotope, Sr–Nd isotope and trace element analyses, and the zircon U–Pb dating.

References

Andersen, T (2002) Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb. Chemical Geology 192, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DA (2006) Speculations on the nature and cause of mantle heterogeneity. Tectonophysics 146, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, NT and Goldstein, SL (1989) An open boundary between lower continental crust and mantle: its role in crust formation and crustal recycling. Tectonophysics 161, 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budnick, RL (1995) Making continental crust. Nature 378, 571–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L, Diwu, CR and Wang, HL (2009) Crust format ion in the Ordos block: constraints from detrital zircons from Ordovician and Permian sandstones. In Abstract with Program of International Discussion Meeting on Continental Geology and Tectonics, p. 17. Xi’an: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, XD and Shi, LB (1983) Primary research on the diabase dyke swarms in Wutai-Taihang area. Chinese Science Bulletin 16, 1002–5.Google Scholar
Chen, XD and Shi, LB (1994) Basic dyke swarms in extensional structures. In Extensional Structures (ed. Qian, XL), pp. 71–4. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
Chen, XD, Shi, LB and Jia, SF (1992) Proterozoic basic dyke swarms in North China. Seismology and Geology 14, 351–7 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Chung, SL, Wang, KL and Crawford, AJ (2001) High Mg potassic rocks from Taiwan: implications for the genesis of orogenic potassic lavas. Lithos 59, 153–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dan, W, Li, XH, Guo, JH, Liu, Y and Wang, XG (2012) Paleoproterozoic evolution of the eastern Alxa Block, westernmost North China: evidence from in situ zircon U-Pb dating and Hf-O isotopes. Gondwana Research 21, 838–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dan, W, Li, XH, Wang, Q, Wang, XC and Liu, Y (2014) Neoproterozoic S-type granites in the Alxa block, westernmost North China and tectonic implications: in situ zircon U-Pb-Hf-O isotopic and geochemical constraints. American Journal of Science 314, 110–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, J, Wang, Q and Li, G (2017) Tectonic evolution, superimposed orogeny, and composite metallogenic system in China. Gondwana Research 50, 216–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaolo, DJ (1981) Trace element and isotopic effects of combined wallrock assimilation and fractional crystallization. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 53, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diwu, CR, Sun, Y, Yuan, HL, Wang, HL, Zhong, XP and Liu, XM (2008) Detrital zircon U-Pb chronology: Hf isotopic and geological significance of Songshan quartzites from Dengfeng, Henan. Chinese Science Bulletin 53, 1923–34 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Elkins-Tanton, LT (2005) Continental magmatism caused by lithospheric delamination. In Plates, Plumes, and Paradigms (eds Foulger, GR, Natland, JH, Presnall, D and Anderson, DL), pp. 449–62. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America, Special Paper 388.Google Scholar
Feng, GY, Liu, S, Zhong, H, Feng, CX, Coulson, IM, Qi, YQ, Yang, YH and Yang, CG (2012) U-Pb zircon geochronology, geochemical, and Sr-Nd isotopic constraints on the age and origin of basaltic porphyries from western Liaoning province, China. International Geology Review 54, 1052–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, LZ, Zhao, T, Wang, YS, Zhao, X, Ma, YS and Yang, SZ (2005) Zircon U-Pb SHRIMP ages of Precambrian basement in Yuntai Mountains, Jiaozuo, Henan. Geological Bulletin of China 24, 1089–93 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Gao, S and Jin, ZM (1997) Delamination and its geodynamical significance for the crust-mantle evolution. Geological Science and Technology Information 16, 1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Gao, S, Luo, TC, Zhang, BR, Zhang, HF, Han, YW, Zhao, ZD and Hu, YK (1998a) Chemical composition of the continental crust as revealed by studies in East China. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 62, 1959–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, S, Rudnick, RL, Xu, WL, Yuan, HL, Liu, YS, Walker, RJ, Puchtel, I, Liu, XM, Huang, H, Wang, XR and Yang, J (2008) Recycling deep cratonic lithosphere and generation of intraplate magmatism in the North China Craton. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 270, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, S, Rudnick, RL, Yuan, HL, Liu, XM, Liu, YS, Xu, WL, Ling, WL, Ayers, J, Wang, XC and Wang, QH (2004) Recycling lower continental crust in the north China craton. Nature 432, 892–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, S, Zhang, BR, Jin, ZM, Kern, H, Luo, TC and Zhao, ZD (1998b) How mafic is the lower continental crust? Earth and Planetary Science Letters 106, 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, S, Zhang, BR, Luo, TC, Li, ZJ and Gao, CL (1992) Chemical composition of the continental crust in the Qinling Belt and its adjacent North China and Yangtze Cratons. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 36, 3933–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geng, YS, Yang, CH, Wang, XR, Ren, LD, Du, LL and Zhou, XW (2007) Ages of crystallized basement in western margin of the Yangtze platform. Geological Journal China Universities 34, 251–61 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Goldfarb, R and Santosh, M (2014) The dilemma of the Jiaodong gold deposits: are they unique? Geoscience Frontiers 5, 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, DR (1992) Animal Minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, WL, Pearson, NI, Belousova, EA and Saeed, A (2006) Comment: Hf-isotope heterogeneity in zircon 91500. Chemical Geology 233, 358–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, WL, Zhang, AD, O’Reilly, SY and Ryan, CG (1998) Evolution of the lithosphere beneath the Sino-Korean Craton. In Mantle Dynamics and Plate Interactions in East Asia (eds Flower, MFJ, Chung, SL, Lo, CH and Lee, TY), pp. 107–26. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, Geodynamics Series 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, F, Fan, WM, Wang, YJ and Li, CW (2004) When did the Emeishan mantle plume activity start? Geochronological and geochemical evidence from ultramafic-mafic dykes in southwestern China. International Geology Review 46, 226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, F, Guo, JT, Wang, YC, Fan, WM, Li, CW, Zhao, L, Li, HX and Li, JY (2013) Formation of mafic magmas through lower crustal AFC processes: an example from the Jinan gabbroic intrusion in the North China Block. Lithos 179, 157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, JH, Sun, M, Chen, FK and Zhai, MG (2005) Sm-Nd and SHRIMP U-Pb zircon geochronology of high-pressure granulites in the Sanggan area, North China Craton: timing of Palaeoproterozoic continental collision. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 24, 629–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzberg, C, Asimow, PD, Arndt, N, Niu, Y, Lesher, CM, Fitton, JG, Cheadle, MJ and Saunders, AD (2007) Temperatures in ambient mantle and plumes: constraints from basalts, picrites, and komatiites. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 8, 1525–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirajima, T, Ishiwatari, A, Cong, B, Zhang, R, Banno, S and Nozaka, T (1990) Coesite from Mengzhong eclogite at Donghai county, northern Jiangsu province, China. Mineralogical Magazine 54, 579–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, GT (2012) Mafic Dyke Swarms of North China. Science Press, 177 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Hou, GT, Li, JH, Lin, AW and Qian, XL (2004) New comment on the early Precambrian tectono-magmatic subdivision and evolution in the western Shandong Block. Geological Journal of China Universities 10, 239–49 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Hou, GT, Liu, YL and Li, JH (2006) Evidence for 1.8 Ga extension of the Eastern Block of the North China Craton from SHRIMP U-Pb dating of mafic dyke swarms in Shandong Province. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 27, 392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X, Bi, Z and DePaolo, DJ (1986) Sm-Nd isotope study of Early Archean rocks, Qian an, Hebei Province, China. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50, 625–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, BM (1988) Archean crustal evolution in China: the Taishan Complex, and evidence for juvenile crustal addition from long-term depleted mantle. Precambrian Research 38, 381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, BM and Bai, YL (1983) Early Archean (3.5 Ga) metabasic rocks from the Tsao Zhuang Group, E Hebei, China: Sm-Nd, common Pb and Rb-Sr isotopic ages. In Symposium “Precambrian Crustal Evolution”, Beijing: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences.Google Scholar
Jahn, BM, Wu, FY, Lo, CH and Tsai, CH (1999) Crust mantle interaction induced by deep subduction of the continental crust: geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from post-collisional mafic-ultramafic intrusions of the northern Dabie complex, central China. Chemical Geology 157, 119–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ju, W, Hou, GT and Zhang, B (2014) Insights into the damage zones in fault-bend folds from geomechanical models and field data. Tectonophysics 610, 182–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, M and Kelemen, PB (2001) On the conditions for lower crustal convective instability. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 423–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, T, Nami, A and Zhai, M (1997) Ultrahigh-pressure marble and eclogite in the Su-Lu ultrahigh-pressure terrane, eastern China. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 15, 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, RW and Kay, SM (1991) Creation and destruction of lower continental crust. Geologists Rundschau 80, 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogiso, T, Hirschmann, MM and Frost, DJ (2003) High-pressure partial melting of garnet pyroxenite: possible mafic lithologies in the source of ocean island basalts. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 216, 603–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Maitre, RW (2002) Igneous Rocks: A Classification and Glossary of Terms, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levander, A, Niu, F, Lee, CTA and Cheng, X (2006) Imaging the continental lithosphere. Tectonophysics 416, 167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, JH, He, WY and Qian, XL (1997) The genetic mechanism of mafic dyke swarm and the reconstruction of ancient plate. Geological Journal of China Universities 3, 2–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Li, SR and Santosh, M (2017) Geodynamics of heterogeneous gold mineralization in the North China Craton and its relationship to lithospheric destruction. Gondwana Research 50, 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, SZ and Zhao, GC (2007) SHRIMP U-Pb zircon geochronology of the Liaoji granitoids: constraints on the evolution of the Paleoproterozoic Jiao-Liao-Ji belt in the Eastern Block of the North China Craton. Precambrian Research 158, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, SZ, Zhao, GC, Santosh, M, Liu, X, Lai, LM, Suo, YH, Song, MC and Wang, PC (2012) Paleoproterozoic structural evolution of the southern segment of the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton. Precambrian Research 200–203, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, SZ, Zhao, GC, Sun, M, Han, ZZ, Zhao, GT and Hao, DF (2006) Are the South and North Liaohe Groups of the North China Craton different exotic terranes? Nd isotope constraints. Gondwana Research 9, 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, TS, Zhai, MG, Peng, P, Chen, L and Guo, J (2010) 2.5 billion year old coeval ultramafic-mafic and syenitic dykes in Eastern Hebei: implications for cratonization of the North China Craton. Precambrian Research 180, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, XP, Yang, ZY, Zhao, GC, Grapes, R and Guo, JH (2011) Geochronology of khondalite-series rocks of the Jining Complex: confirmation of depositional age and tectonometamorphic evolution of the North China Craton. International Geology Review 53, 1194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y (2014) The comparative study on the mafic dykes between 1.6 Ga and 1.8 Ga from western Shandong province, North China Craton. Master’s thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Liu, DY (1991) Discovery of old continental crust in China. Geology in China 5, 30 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Liu, DY, Nutman, AP, Williams, JS, Compston, W, Wu, JS and Shen, QH (1994) The remnants of 3800 Ma crust in Sino-Korean Craton: the evidence from ion microprobe U-Pb dating of zircons. Acta Geoscientica Sinica 1–2, 1–13 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Liu, DY, Nutman, APW, Compston, W, Wu, JS and Shen, QH (1992) Remnants of 3800 Ma crust in the Chinese part of the Sino-Korean Craton. Geology 20, 339–42.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, Cx, Jahn, BM, Hu, RZ, Zhai, MG and Lai, SC (2014) Zircon U-Pb age, geochemical, and Sr-Nd isotopic constraints on the origin of late Carboniferous mafic dykes of the north China Craton, Shanxi province, China. Acta Petrologica Sinica 30, 1707–1717.Google Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, CX, Feng, GY, Xu, MJ, Coulson, IM, Guo, XL, Guo, Z, Peng, H and Feng, Q (2017) Timing, mantle source and origin of mafic dykes within the gravity anomaly belt of the Taihang-Da Hinggan gravity lineament, central North China Craton. Journal of Geodynamics 109, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, CX, Hu, RZ, Zhai, MG, Gao, S, Lai, SC, Yan, J, Coulson, IM and Zou, HB (2015) Zircon U-Pb geochronological, geochemical, and Sr-Nd isotope data for early Cretaceous mafic dykes in the Tancehng-Lujiang Fault area of the Shandong province, China: Constraints on the timing of magmatism and magma genesis. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 99, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, CX, Jahn, BM, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Coulson, IM, Feng, GY, Lai, SC, Yang, CG and Yang, YH (2013a) Zircon U-Pb age, geochemical, and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on the origin of mafic dykes in the Shaanxi Province, North China Craton, China. Lithos 175-176, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, CX, Jahn, BM, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Coulson, IM, Feng, GY, Lai, SC, Yang, YH and Tang, L (2013c) Geochemical, Sr-Nd-Pb isotope, and zircon U-Pb geochronological constraints on the origin of Early Permian mafic dykes, northern North China Craton. International Geology Review 55, 1626–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, CX, Jahn, BM, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, GY, Lai, SC, Yang, YH, Qi, YQ and Coulson, IM (2013b) Geochemical, Sr-Nd isotopic, and zircon U-Pb geochronological constraints on the petrogenesis of Late Paleoproterozoic mafic dykes within the northern North China Craton, Shanxi Province, China. Precambrian Research 206, 182–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, CX, Santosh, M, Feng, GY, Coulson, IM, Xu, MJ, Guo, Z, Guo, XL, Peng, H and Feng, Q (2018) Integrated elemental Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopic studies of Mesozoic mafic dykes from the eastern North China Craton: implications for the dramatic transformation of Mlithospheric mantle. Journal of Geodynamics 114, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Feng, CX, Zhai, MG, Hu, RZ and Yan, J (2016) Zircon U-Pb age, geochemical, and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on the origin of early Cretaceous mafic dykes from western Shandong province, eastern North China Craton. Acta Petrologica Sinica 32, 629–645.Google Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, CX, Coulson, IM, Feng, GY, Qi, YQ, Yang, YH, Yang, CG and Tang, L (2012a) U-Pb zircon age, geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic data as constraints on the petrogenesis and emplacement time of the Precambrian mafic dyke swarms in the North China Craton (NCC). Lithos 140-141, 38-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, CX, Feng, GY, Coulson, IM, Li, C, Wang, T and Qi, YQ (2010c) Zircon U-Pb age and Sr-Nd-Hf isotope geochemistry of Permian granodiorite and associated gabbro in the Songliao Block, NE China and implications for growth of juvenile crust. Lithos 114, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, CX, Qi, L, Zhong, H, Xiao, TF, Qi, YQ, Wang, T and Coulson, IM (2008b) Zircon U-Pb geochronology and major, trace elemental and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry of mafic dykes in western Shandong Province, east China: constraints on their petrogenesis and geodynamic significance. Chemical Geology 255, 329–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, CX, Qi, YQ, Wang, T, Feng, GY and Coulson, IM (2008a) U-Pb zircon age, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopic constraints on age and origin of alkaline intrusions and associated mafic dykes from Sulu orogenic belt, Eastern China. Lithos 106, 365–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, CX and Tang, L (2012b) Geochemical and isotopic constraints on the age and origin of mafic dikes from Eastern Shandong province, Eastern North China Craton, China. International Geology Review 54, 1389–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, CX, Yu, BB, Feng, GY, Qi, YQ, Wang, T and Coulson, IM (2009) Petrogenesis of Late Mesozoic mafic dykes in the Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern North China Craton and implications for the foundering of lower crust. Lithos 113, 621–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Zhao, JH and Feng, CX (2004) K-Ar ages of Mesozoic mafic dyke rocks and crustal extension in Shandong Province, eastern China. Acta Geologica Sinica 78, 1207–1213.Google Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Zhao, JH, Feng, CX, Zhong, H, Cao, JJ and Shi, DN (2005) Geochemical characteristics and petrogenetic investigation of the Late Mesozoic lamprophyres of Jiaobei, Shandong province. Acta Petrologica Sinica 21, 947–58 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Liu, S, Hu, RZ, Gao, S, Feng, CX, Zhong, H, Qi, YQ, Wang, T, Feng, GY and Yang, YH (2011) U-Pb zircon age along with geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic constraints on the dating and origin of intrusive complexes from the Sulu orogenic belt, Eastern China. International Geology Review 53, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Su, WC, Hu, RZ, Feng, XC, Gao, S, Coulosn, IM, Wang, T, Feng, GY, Tao, Y and Xia, Y (2010b) Geochronological and geochemical constraints on the petrogenesis of alkaline ultramafic dykes from southwest Guizhou Province, SW China. Lithos 114, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Zou, HB, Hu, RZ, Zhao, JH and Feng, CX (2006) Mesozoic mafic dikes from the Shandong Peninsula, North China Craton: Petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Geochemical Journal 40, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, YS, Hu, ZC, Zong, KQ, Gao, CG, Gao, S, Xu, J and Chen, HH (2010a) Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS. Chinese Science Bulletin 55, 1535–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, KR (2003) User’s manual for Isoplot/Ex version 3.00, a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publications 4, 72.Google Scholar
Lugmair, GW and Harti, K (1978) Lunar initial 143Nd/144Nd: differential evolution of the lunar crust and mantle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 39, 349–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y, Sun, M, Zhao, GC, Ayers, JC, Li, SZ, Xia, XP and Zhang, JH (2008) A comparison of U-Pb and Hf isotopic compositions of detrital zircons from the North and South Liaohe Group: constraints on the evolution of the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton. Precambrian Research 16, 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, ZH, Wei, Y, Xin, HT, Zhang, HM, Ke, S and Li, WT (2006) Petrogenes of the post-orogenic dyke complex-constraints to thioshpere deamination. Acta Petrologica Sinica 22, 1672–84 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Lustrino, M (2005) How the delamination and detachment of lower crust can influence basaltic magmatism. Earth-Science Reviews 72, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, MA and Kyle, PR (1972) Continental volcanism: a crust-mantle probe. In Continental Mantle (ed Menzies, MA), pp. 157–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Middlemost, EAK (1994) Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system. Earth-Science Reviews 74, 193–227.Google Scholar
Muller, D, Franz, L, Herzig, PM and Hunt, S (2001) Potassic igneous rocks from the vicinity of epithermal gold mineralization. Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea. Lithos 57, 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, DR (1992) Isotopic characteristics of potassic rocks: evidence for the involvement of subducted sediments in the magma genesis. Lithos 28, 403–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, YL, Wilson, M, Humphreys, ER and O’Hara, MJ (2011) The origin of intra-plate Ocean Island Basalts (OIB): The lid effect and its geodynamic implications. Journal of Petrology 52, 1443–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, SY, Griffin, WL, Poudjom Djomani, YH and Morgan, P (2001) Are lithospheres forever? Tracking changes in sub-continental lithospheric mantle through time. GSA Today 11, 4–10.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, P (2010) Reconstruction and interpretation of giant mafic dyke swarms: a case study of 1.78 Ga magmatism in the North China Craton. In The Evolving Continents: Understanding Processes of Continental Growth (ed. TM Kusky), pp. 163–78. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 338.Google Scholar
Peng, P, Bleeker, W, Ernst, RE, Söderlund, U and McNicoll, V (2011a) U-Pb baddeleyite ages, distribution and geochemistry of 925 Ma mafic dykes and 900 Ma sills in the North China craton: evidence for a Neoproterozoic mantle plume. Lithos 127, 210–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, P, Guo, JH, Zhai, MG and Bleeker, W (2010) Paleoproterozoic gabbronoritic and granitic magmatism in the northern margin of the North China Craton: evidence of crust–mantle interaction. Precambrian Research 183, 635–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, P, Zhai, MG, Guo, JH, Kusky, T and Zhao, TP (2007) Nature of mantle source contributions and crystal differentiation in the petrogenesis of the 1.78 Ga mafic dykes in the central North China craton. Gondwana Research 12, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, P, Zhai, MG, Li, QL, Wu, FY, Hou, QL, Li, Z, Li, TS and Zhang, YB (2011b) Neoproterozoic (900 Ma) Sariwon sills in North Korea: geochronology, geochemistry and implications for the evolution of the south-eastern margin of the North China Craton. Gondwana Research 20, 243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, P, Zhai, MG, Li, Z, Wu, FY and Hou, QL (2008) Neoproterozoic (∼820 Ma) mafic dyke swarms in the North China craton: implication for a conjoint to the Rodinia supercontinent? Abstracts, 13th Gondwana Conference, September 15–22, 160–1, Elsevier, Netherlands, Kerala, India.Google Scholar
Peng, P, Zhai, MG, Zhang, HF and Guo, JH (2005) Geochronological constraints on the Palaeoproterozoic evolution of the North China Craton: SHRIMP zircon ages of different types of mafic dykes. International Geology Review 47, 492–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, PJ and Kane, JS (2005) International association of geoanalysts certificate of analysis: certified reference material OU-6 (Penrhyn slate). Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 29, 233–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, L, Hu, J and Grégoire, DC (2000) Determination of trace elements in granites by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta 51, 507–13.Google Scholar
Qi, YQ, Hu, RZ, Liu, S, Coulson, IM, Qi, HW, Tian, JJ, Feng, CX and Wang, T (2012) Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions of Mesjozoic mafic dykes from the Gan-Hang tectonic belt, south China: petrogenesis and geodynamic significance. International Geology Review 54, 920–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, RP, Shimizu, N and Norman, MD (2003) Growth of early continental crust by partial melting of eclogite. Nature 425, 605–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapp, RP, Shimizu, N, Norman, MD and Applegate, GS (1999) Reaction between slab-derived melts and peridotite in the mantle wedge: experimental constraints at 3.8 GPa. Chemical Geology 160, 335–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regional Geology of Shandong Province (1995) Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1–533 pp.Google Scholar
Rogers, NW and Setterfle, TN (1994) Potassium and incompatible element enrichment in shoshonitic lavas from the Tavua volcano, Fiji. Chemical Geology 118, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudnick, RL and Fountain, DM (1995) Nature and composition of the continental crust: a lower crustal perspective. Reviews of Geophysics 33, 267–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santosh, M (2010) Assembling North China Craton within the Columbia supercontinent: the role of double-sided subduction. Precambrian Research 178, 149–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, JA and Zhang, LQ (2002) Mesozoic dyke swarms in the north of North China. Acta Petrologica Sinica 18, 312–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Shen, QH, Geng, YS, Song, B and Wan, YS (2005) New informations of Earth surface and deep crust from the North China Block, Yangtze Block and Qinling-Dabie orogenic belt. Acta Geologica Sinica 79, 616–27 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Sobolev, AV, Hofmann, AW, Kuzmin, DV, Yaxley, GM, Arndt, NT, Chung, SL, Danyushevsky, LV, Elliott, T, Frey, FA, Garcia, MO, Gurenko, AA, Kamenetsky, VS, Kerr, AC, Krivolutskaya, NA, Matvienkov, VV, Nikogosian, IK, Rocholl, A, Sigurdsson, IA, Sushchevskaya, NM and Teklay, M (2007) The amount of recycled crust in sources of mantle-derived melts. Science 316, 412–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobolev, AV, Hofmann, AW, Sobolev, SV and Nikogosian, IK (2005) An olivine-free mantle source of Hawaiian shield basalts. Nature 434, 590–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, B, Allen, PN, Liu, DY and Wu, JS (1996) 3800 to 2500 Ma crustal evolution the Anshan area of Liaoning Province, northeastern China. Precambrian Research 78, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiger, RH and Jäger, E (1977) Subcommission on geochronology; convention on the use of decay constants in geochronology and cosmochronology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 36, 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, SS and McDonough, WF (1989) Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts; implications for mantle composition and processes. In Magmatism in the Ocean Basins (eds Saunders, AD and Norry, MJ) pp. 313–45. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 42.Google Scholar
Tam, PY, Zhao, GC, Liu, FL, Zhou, XW, Sun, M and Li, SZ (2011) SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages of high-pressure mafic and pelitic granulites and associated rocks in the Jiaobei massif: constraints on the metamorphic ages of the Paleoproterozoic Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt in the North China Craton. Gondwana Research 19, 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, PY, Zhao, GC, Sun, M, Li, SZ, Iizukac, Y, Ma, SK, Yin, CQ, He, YH and Wu, ML (2012a) Metamorphic P-T path and tectonic implications of medium-pressure politic granulites from the Jiaobei massif in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton. Precambrian Research 220–221, 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, PY, Zhao, GC, Sun, M, Li, SZ, Wu, ML and Yin, CQ (2012b) Petrology and metamorphic P-T path of high-pressure mafic granulites from the Jiaobei massif in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, NCC. Lithos 155, 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, PY, Zhao, GC, Zhou, XW, Sun, M, Li, SZ, Yin, CQ, Wu, ML and He, YH (2012c) Metamorphic P–T path and implications of high-pressure pelitic granulites from the Jiaobei massif in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, NCC. Gondwana Research 22, 104–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, L and Santosh, M (2017) Neoarchean granite-greenstone belts and related ore mineralization in the North China Craton: an overview. Geoscience Frontiers 3, 751–68.Google Scholar
Taylor, SR and McLennan, SM (1985) The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, M, Potts, PJ, Kane, JS and Wilson, S (2000) An international proficiency test for analytical geochemistry laboratories: report on round 5 (August 1999). Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 24, 1–28.Google Scholar
Wan, YS, Liu, DY and Song, B (2005) Geochemical and Nd isotopic composition of 3.8 Ga meta-quartz dioritic and trondhjemitic rocks from the Archean area and their geological significance. Journal of Asian Earth Science 24, 563–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, F, Li, XP, Chu, H and Zhao, GC (2011) Petrology and metamorphism of khondalites from Jining Complex in the North China Craton. International Geology Review 53, 212–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, HL, Chen, L, Sun, Y, Liu, XM, Xu, XY, Chen, JL, Zhang, H and Diwu, CR (2007) Discovery of ca. 4.1 Ga trapped zircon. Chinese Science Bulletin 52, 1685–93 (in Chinese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, LQ, Qiu, YM, McNaughton, NL, Groves, DI, Luo, ZK, Huang, JZ, Miao, LC and Liu, YK (1998) Constraints on crustal evolution and gold metallogeny in the northwestern Jiaodong, China, from SHRIMP U-Pb zircon studies of granitoids. Ore Geology Review 13, 275–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, SJ (1990) The Precambrian rocks in western Shandong province, China. Shandong Geology 6, 59–80 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, SJ (1991) Stage and phase division and basic features of Precambrian intrusive rocks in the western Shandong Province. Regional Geology in China 4, 298–307 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, SJ (1993) Early Precambrian geotectonic in the western Shandong. Regional Geology in China 3, 216–22 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, XS, Zhuang, YX and Xu, HF (1999) The significance of terminal Archean ductile shearing in continental crustal evolution of the Taishan Mountain region. Regional Geology in China 18, 168–74 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, YM, Gao, YS, Han, HM and Wang, XH (2003) Practical Handbook of Reference Materials for Geoanalysis. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Weaver, BI (1991) The origin of ocean island end-member compositions: trace element and isotopic constraints. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 104, 381–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedepohl, KH (1991) Chemical composition and fractionation of the continental crust. Geologische Rundschau 80, 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, SA, Zhao, GC and Sun, M (2002) Development of the North China craton during the Late Archaean and its final amalgamation at 1.8 Ga: some speculation on its position within a global Palaeoproterozoic Supercontinent. Gondwana Research 5, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, FY, Walker, RJ, Yang, YH, Yuan, HL and Yang, HH (2006) The chemical-temporal evolution of lithospheric mantle underlying the North China Craton. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70, 5013–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, FY, Xu, YG, Gao, S and Zheng, JP (2008) Lithospheric thinning and destruction of the North China Craton. Acta Petrologica Sinica 24, 1145–74 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wu, JS, Geng, YS, Shen, QH, Wang, YS, Liu, DY and Song, B (1998) Archean Geological Nature and Tectonic Evolution of Sino-Korean Continent. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, —212 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Xia, XP, Sun, M, Zhao, GC, Wu, FY, Xu, P and Zhang, JS (2008) Paleoproterozoic crustal growth events in the Western Block of the North China Craton: evidence from detrital zircon Hf and whole rock Sr-Nd isotopes of the khondalites in the Jining Complex. American Journal of Science 308, 304–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, YG (2001) Thermo-tectonic destruction of the Archean lithospheric keel beneath the Sino-Korean Craton in China: evidence, timing and mechanism. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 26, 747–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, JH, Wu, FY, Chung, SL, Wilde, SA and Chu, MF (2006) A hybrid origin for the Qianshan A-type granite, Northeast China: geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic evidence. Lithos 89, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, JH, Wu, FY, Wilde, SA and Liu, XM (2007) Genesis of Late Triassic granites and mafic enclaves in the Liaodong Peninsula: evidence for lithospheric thinning after the collision of the North China Craton. Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and Geochemistry Z1, 64–66.Google Scholar
Yang, QY and Santosh, M (2017) The building of an Archean microcontinent: evidence from the North China Craton. Gondwana Research 50, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, QY, Santosh, M, Collins, AS and Teng, XM (2016) Microblock amalgamation in the North China Craton: evidence from Neoarchaean magmatic suite in the western margin of the Jiaoliao Block. Gondwana Research 31, 96–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaxley, GM (2000) Experimental study of the phase and melting relations of homogeneous basalt plus peridotite mixtures and implications for the petrogenesis of flood basalts. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 139, 326–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaxley, GM and Green, DH (1998) Reactions between eclogite and peridotite: mantle refertilisation by subduction of oceanic crust. Schweizerische Mineralogische und Petrographische Mitteilungen 78, 243–55.Google Scholar
Ye, S, Lambert, SB, Grimwood, K, Roczo-Farkas, S, Nimmo, GR, Sloots, TP, Kirkwood, CD and Whiley, DM (2015) Comparison of test specificities of commercial antigen-based assays and in-house PCR methods for detection of rotavirus in stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 53, 295–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, CQ, Zhao, GC, Guo, JH, Sun, M, Zhou, XW, Zhang, J, Xia, XP and Liu, CH (2011) U-Pb and Hf isotopic study of zircons of the Helanshan Complex: constraints on the evolution of the Khondalite Belt in the Western Block of the North China Craton. Lithos 122, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, CQ, Zhao, GC, Sun, M, Xia, XP, Wei, CJ, Zhou, XW and Leung, WH (2009) LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon ages of the Qianlishan Complex: constraints on the evolution of the Khondalite Belt in the Western Block of the North China Craton. Precambrian Research 174, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, MG (2010) Tectonic evolution and metallogenesis of North China Craton. Mineral Deposits 29, 24–36 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhai, MG and Bian, AG (2000) The supercontinent assembling during Neoarchean and the cracking between Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic of the North China Craton. Science in China 30, 129–37 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhai, MG and Peng, P (2007) Paleoproterozoic events in the North China Craton. Acta Petrologica Sinica 23, 1665–82 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhai, MG and Santosh, M (2011) The early Precambrian odyssey of the North China Craton: a synoptic overview. Gondwana Research 20, 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, MG and Santosh, M (2013) Metallogeny of the North China Craton: link with secular changes in the evolving Earth. Gondwana Research 24, 275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, CL, Liu, L, Wang, SJ, Liu, S and Dai, MN (2009) Detrital zircon provenance for the meta-sedimentary rocks from Kuanping Group: implication for Neoproterozoic reconstruction in Qinling Orogeny, central China. In Abstract with Program of International Discussion Meeting on the Continental Geology and Tectonics (ed. Y Yao), pp. 64–6. Xi’an: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, GW, Meng, QR and Lai, SC (1995) Tectonics and structure of Qinling orogenic belt. Science in China 38, 1379–94.Google Scholar
Zhang, HF and Sun, M (2002) Geochemistry of Mesozoic basalts and mafic dykes, southeastern north China Craton, and tectonic implications. International Geology Review 44, 370–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, HF, Sun, M, Lu, FX, Zhou, XH, Zhou, M, Liu, YS and Zhang, GH (2001) Geochemical significance of a garnet Iherzolite from the Dahongshan kimberlite, Yangtze Craton, southern China. Geochemical Journal 35, 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, HF, Sun, M, Zhou, XH and Ying, JF (2005) Geochemical constraints on the origin of Mesozoic alkaline intrusive complexes from the North China Craton and tectonic implications. Lithos 81, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, HF, Sun, M, Zhou, XH, Zhou, MF, Fan, WM and Zheng, JP (2003) Secular evolution of the lithosphere beneath the eastern North China Craton: evidence from Mesozoic basalts and high-Mg andesites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67, 4373–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, JX, Gong, JH, Yu, SY and Li, HK (2013) Neoarchean-Paleoproterozoic multiple tectonothermal events in the western Alxa block, North China Craton and their geological implication: Evidence from zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopic composition. Precambrian Research 235, 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q, Li, CD, Wang, Y, Wang, YL, Jin, WJ and Han, S (2005) Mesozoic high-Sr and low-Yb granitoids and low-Sr and high-Yb granitoids in eastern China: comparison and geological implications. Acta Petrologica Sinica 21, 1527–37 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhao, GC (2009) Metamorphic evolution of major tectonic units in the basement of the North China Craton; key issues and discussion. Acta Petrologica Sinica 25, 1772–92.Google Scholar
Zhao, GC (2013) Precambrian Evolution of the North China Craton Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zhao, GC, Sun, M, Wilde, SA and Li, SZ (2005) Late Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic evolution of the North China Craton: key issues revisited. Precambrian Research 136, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, GC, Wilde, SA, Cawood, PA and Sun, M (2001) Archean blocks and their boundaries in the North China Craton: lithological, geochemical, structural and P-T path constraints and tectonic evolution. Precambrian Research 107, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, GC and Zhai, MG (2013) Lithotectonic elements of Precambrian basement in the North China Craton: review and tectonic implications. Gondwana Research 23, 1207–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, JP, Griffin, WL and O’Reilly, SY (2004) 3.6 Ga lower crust in central China: new evidence on the assembly of the North China Craton. Geology 32, 229–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhi, XC (1990) Trace element geochemistry of Tertiary continental alkalic basalt from Liuhe-Yizheng, Jiangsu province, China. Acta Petrologica Sinica 2, 30–42.Google Scholar
Zhou, XH and Armstrong, RL (1982) Cenozoic volcanic rocks of eastern China-Secular and geographic trends in chemistry and strontium isotopic composition. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 58, 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, XW, Zhao, GC, Wei, CJ, Geng, YS and Sun, M (2008) Metamorphic evolution and Th-U-Pb zircon and monazite geochronology of high-pressure pelitic granulites in the Jiaobei massif of the North China Craton. American Journal of Science 308, 328–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, HB, Zindler, A, Xu, XS and Qi, Q (2000) Major, trace element, and Nd, Sr and Pb isotope studies of Cenozoic basalts in SE China: Mantle sources, regional variations, and tectonic significance. Chemical Geoogy 171, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Location of the study area within the northeastern NCC. (b) Geological map of the study area, showing the distribution of mafic dykes studied and the location of samples collected during this study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U–Pb isotope data for the mafic dykes studied within western Shandong province, northeastern NCC

Figure 2

Table 2. Major element concentrations (wt %) for the mafic dykes studied. LOI = loss on ignition; Mg# = 100Mg/(Mg + Fe) in atomic proportions; RV = recommended values; MV=measured values. Values for GSR-1 and GSR-3 are from Wang et al. (2003)

Figure 3

Table 3. Trace element compositions (ppm) of the mafic dykes studied. RV = recommended values; MV = measured values. Values for GBPG-1 and OU-6 are from Thompson et al. (2000) and Potts and Kane (2005), respectively.

Figure 4

Table 4. Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of the mafic dykes studied. The compositions were calculated using Chondrite Uniform Reservoir values and decay constants of λRb = 1.42 × 10–11 year–1 (Steiger & Jäger, 1977) and λSm = 6.54 × 10–12 year–1 (Lugmair & Harti, 1978)

Figure 5

Table 5. Hf isotopic compositions of representative samples studied in western Shandong province

Figure 6

Fig. 2. The field and microscopic photos of the mafic dykes studied. Pl – plagioclase; Cpx – clinopyroxene.

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Representative CL images of zircon grains from samples from the mafic dykes studied.

Figure 8

Fig. 4. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U–Pb concordia diagrams and the 207Pb/206Pb weighted mean ages from the mafic dykes studied.

Figure 9

Fig. 5. Classification of the mafic dykes studied. (a) Total-alkali silica (Middlemost, 1994; Le Maitre, 2002) using major element concentrations recalculated to 100 % volatile-free compositions. (b) variations in K2O vs Na2O concentrations (Menzies & Kyle, 1972).

Figure 10

Fig. 6. Variations in major element concentrations vs MgO ( wt %) for the mafic dykes studied.

Figure 11

Fig. 7. Variations in trace element concentrations vs MgO ( wt %) for the mafic dykes studied.

Figure 12

Fig. 8. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE and (b) primitive-mantle-normalized multi-element variation diagrams for the mafic dykes studied. Concentrations are normalized to chondrite composition of Sun and McDonough (1989).

Figure 13

Fig. 9. Variations in initial 87Sr/86Sr vs ϵNd(t) values for the mafic dykes studied. The field delineates the composition of Proterozoic mafic dykes within the NCC (Liu et al.2013b). The mafic dykes analysed during this study plot within the isotope-depleted mantle source field.

Figure 14

Fig. 10. Plots of zircon ages vs ϵHf(t) values for the mafic dykes studied.

Figure 15

Fig. 11. Variations in La vs La/Sm and Sm vs Sm/Yb of the mafic dykes studied.

Figure 16

Fig. 12. The correlative plots MgO vs SiO2 (a) and Cr vs Ni (b) for the mafic dykes studied.