No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
AT the present time most mining geologists appear to be in general agreement on the principle that primary ore-deposits are derived from igneous magmas. Furthermore, it is now almost universally recognized that the segregation and concentration of the metals and their compounds into payable ore-deposits is but part of a larger and more fundamental problem, namely, the differentiation of the igneous rocks, a problem which has exercised the ingenuity of petrologists for many years past and is still by no means solved. Unfortunately most of the speculations and theories put forward in explanation of these phenomena are in the main founded on facts and inferences derived from the study of the silicates; comparatively few petrologists have taken into account the behaviour of the oxidic and sulphidic compounds of the useful metals, which are commonly regarded in the light of rare and accidental constituents of the magma, rather than as having any particular bearing on the point at issue. The most notable exception to this general statement is Vogt, whose work on slags and ore-deposits is of an epoch-making character from the theoretical point of view, as well as of immense practical importance in smelting and blast-furnace practice. However, within the last few years great attention has been devoted by mining geologists to the subject of the genesis of ore-deposits, mainly because of its bearing on the question of persistence in depth or the replacement at lower levels of one ore by another, such as is known to occur in certain cases. It may be suggested, therefore, that the time has now come when it may be possible to attempt to combine the facts hitherto discovered along different lines of research into a coherent whole.
page 290 note 1 Studier over Slagger, Stockholm, 1884Google Scholar; Die Silikatschmelzlösungen, Kristiania, 1903–1904.Google Scholar
page 291 note 1 It has been well pointed out by Daly that the formation of crystals of different minerals, such as quartz, felspar, and mica, from a magmatic solution is in reality a process of differentiation in its simplest form. Each single crystal is in such a case a unit of differentiation. This point has been ignored by most petrologists. It is in reality only the mono-mineralic rocks which can be regarded as strictly homogeneous, and these are very rare.
page 291 note 2 Loewinson-Lessing, , Geol. Mag., 1911, p. 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 291 note 3 Daly, , Igneous Rocks and their Origin, New York, 1914.Google Scholar
page 293 note 1 Daly, R. A., Igneous Rocks and their Origin, New York, 1914, p. 47.Google Scholar
page 295 note 1 “Zur Physik des Vulkanismus”: Geol. Foren. Forh., vol. xxii, 1900, 395.Google Scholar Abstract in Geol. Mag., 1907, p. 173.Google Scholar
page 295 note 2 Roscoe, & Schorlemmer, , Treatise on Chemistry, vol. ii, 1913, pp. 861, 1095.Google Scholar
page 297 note 1 Butler, , Econ. Geol., vol. x, 1915, pp. 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar