Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:17:24.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determining the representative composition of a set of sandstone samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

G. M. Philip
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia
D. F. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia

Abstract

The description of sandstone samples, defined by three components, is introduced through non-parametric sample density description. The composition of a particular sample defines a direction from the origin of the Cartesian reference frame. Radial difference between individual samples then provides the measure of their similarity. A sample set can be viewed as a bundle of compositional axes with a corresponding density distribution on both the ternary diagram (or unit constant sum plane) and the positive octant of the unit sphere. Because radial differences are disproportionately displayed on the ternary diagram, radial density calculations on the sphere are to be preferred. The mode of the sample set, the implied centre of greatest data concentration, is considered to be the most meaningful representative value, as the component joint mean can lie outside the data field with certain data configurations. In addition, the component joint mean cannot provide a useful representative composition for samples drawn from a bimodal distribution. Sample density distribution not only provides a data defined approach to describe sample dispersion, but also furnishes an indication of sample sufficiency in displaying the degree to which modes are supported by surrounding observations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coles-Phillips, F. C. 1954. The Use of Stereographic Projection in Structural Geology. London: Edward Arnold, 86 pp.Google Scholar
Dickinson, W. R. & Rich, E. I. 1972, Petrologic intervals and petrofacies in the Great Valley Sequence, Sacramento Valley, California. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 63, 2164–82.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. 1930. Statistische Darstellungsmethoden in der tektonischen Forschung. Sitzugsberger (Preusse) Geologische Landesanstalt 22, 425.Google Scholar
Imbrie, J. & Purdy, E. G. 1962. Classification of modern Bahaman carbonate sediments. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 1, 253–72.Google Scholar
le Maitre, R. W. 1982. Numerical Petrology. Statistical Interpretation of Geochemical Data. Amsterdam; Elsevier, 281 pp.Google Scholar
Parzen, E. 1962. On estimation of a probability density function and mode. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33, 1065–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, G. M., Skilbeck, G. C. & Watson, D. F. 1987. Algebraic dispersion fields on ternary diagrams. Mathematical Geology 19, 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, G. M. & Watson, D. F. 1988. Some geometric aspects of the ternary diagram. Journal of Geological Education 36, (in press).Google Scholar
Sager, T. W. 1983. Estimating modes and isopleths. Communication, Statistics and Theoretical Methods 12 (5), 529–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeben, H. 1984. A new cluster algorithm for orientation data. Mathematical Geology 16, 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarter, M. E. & Kronmal, R. A. 1976. An introduction to the implementation and theory of nonparametric density estimation. American Statistician 30, 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. F. 1988. Natural neighbour sorting on the n-dimensional sphere. Pattern Recognition 21 (1), 63–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. F. & Philip, G. M. 1984. Triangle based interpolation. Mathematical Geology 14, 779–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. F. & Philip, G. M. 1988. Discrete sample density description using natural neighbour relationships. Biometrics (in press).Google Scholar