Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:02:17.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of the Bashkirian–Moscovian boundary in the Volga region via conodont species Declinognathodus donetzianus Nemirovskaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2014

GUZEL SUNGATULLINA
GUZEL SUNGATULLINA*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The selection of the global biomarker of the lower boundary of the Moscovian stages is one of the pressing issues of Carboniferous stratigraphy. Several solutions are suggested for this problem: Diplognathodus ellesmerensis Bender, Streptognathodus expansus (Igo & Koike) and Idiognathoides postsulcatus Nemirovskaya. The conodont species Declinognathodus donetzianus Nemirovskaya is one of the most prospective. It was detected in the rock sections of west Europe, the Donets Basin, the Moscow Syneclise, south Ural and the Appalachian Basin. The Volga region is also one of the places where Declinognathodus donetzianus Nemirovskaya is often met and this article is dedicated to detailed analysis of this species.

Keywords

conodontsBashkirianMoscovianVolga regionDeclinognathodus donetzianus
Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 151 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 299 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alekseev, A. S., Barskov, I. S. & Kononova, L. I. 1994. Stratigraphy of the Lower Moscovian Substage (Middle Carboniferous) of Central Russia according to conodonts. Moscow University Geology Bulletin 49 (2), 22–33.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E., Lambert, L. L., Heckel, P. H., Rosscoe, S. J. & Boardman, D. R. 2013. Midcontinent Pennsylvanian conodont zonation. Stratigraphy 10, 55–72.Google Scholar
Chernykh, V. V. 2006. Lower Permian Conodonts of Urals. Yekaterinburg: Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Urals Branch of RAS, 130 pp.Google Scholar
Chernykh, V. V. 2009. Early Gzhelian conodonts from the group Streptognathodus simulator Ellison (section Usolka). Yearbook 2008. Proceedings of the Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Urals Branch of RAS 156, 50–54.Google Scholar
Chernykh, V.V. 2010. Gzhelian conodonts from the group Idiognathodus tersus Ellison. Yearbook 2009. Proceedings of the Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Urals Branch of RAS 157, 50–53.Google Scholar
Goreva, N. V. & Alekseev, A. S. 2001. Conodonta. In Middle Carboniferous of Moskow Syneclise (Southern Part). Volume 2. Biostratigraphy (eds Alekseev, A. S. & Schik, S. M.), pp. 33–55. Moscow: Scientific World.Google Scholar
Grayson, R. C. 1984. Morrowan and Atokan (Pennsylvanian) conodonts from the Northwestern margin of the Acbuckle Mountains Southern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 136, 41–63.Google Scholar
Gubareva, V. S., Khalymbadzha, V. G. & Igonin, V. M. 1995. Middle Carboniferous central Tokmovskogo arch. In Biostratigraphy of the Middle-Upper Paleozoic of the Russian Platform and Plicate Regions of the Urals and the Tien-Shan (ed. Klenina, L. N.), pp. 38–46. Moscow: VNIGNI.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. & Bouckaert, J. 1968. Conodont stratigraphy and paleontology of the Namurian of Belgium. Service Géologique de Belgique 10, 1–64.Google Scholar
Kulagina, E. I., Pazukhin, V. N. & Davydov, V. I. 2009. Pennsylvanian biostratigraphy of the Basu river section with emphasis on the Bashkirian-Moscovian transition. In Proceedings of the International Field Meeting on Carboniferous Type Section in Russia and Potential Global Stratotypes (eds Puchkov, V. V., Kulagina, E. I., Nicolaeva, S. V. & Kochetova, N. N.), pp. 42–63. Ufa–Sibai, August 13–18.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1990. Samye pozdnie predstaviteli roda Declinognathodus v pogranichnykh otlozheniyakh bashkirskogo i moskovskogo yarusov Donetskogo baseina (The last representatives of the genus Declinognathodus of the Donbas Carboniferous). Paleontological Zbornik 27, 39–42.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1999. Bashkirian Conodonts of the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Ukraine: Scripta Geologica, 115 pp.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. & Alekseev, A. S. 1994. The Bashkirian conodonts of the Askyn Section Bashkirian mountains, Russia. Bulletin de la Societe Belge de Geologie 103, 109–33.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Hu, K. Y., Wang, Q. L. & Lin, W. 2013. Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy of the Dianzishang section, Zhenning, Guizhou, South China. Geological Magazine 19, 1–17.Google Scholar
Sungatullina, G. M. 2012. The Carboniferous Conodonts of the East Part of Russian Plate. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 162 pp.Google Scholar
Work, D. M., Mason, C. E. & Boardman, D. R. 2012. Pennsylvanian (atokan) ammonoids from the Magoffin Member of the Four Corners Formation, eastern Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology 86 (3), 403–16.Google Scholar
Yuping, Q., Xiangdong, W. & Lambert, L. 2010. Staus report on conodonts from the Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary interval at the Naqing (Nashui) section, South China. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, 47–50.Google Scholar