Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:58:52.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Deep Boring at North Creake, Norfolk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

P. E. Kent
P. E. Kent
Affiliation:
(D'Arcy Exploration Company)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

1. The North Creake boring shows the Chalk up to the Coranguinum zone to be appreciably thicker than at the nearest outcrops. The Chalk rests upon fine-grained Upper Greensand (possibly Albian) which is developed in addition to the normal Red Chalk.

2. The “Lower Greensand” is developed much as at outcrop, but the Sandringham Sands are thickened by one-third. There is a strong indication of a stratigraphical break in the middle of the Carstone, which may mark the boundary between the Aptian and Albian stages.

3. The Kimeridge, Corallian (Ampthill), and Oxford Clays are developed as in the King's Lynn district, and (in contrast to Southerey) normal Kellaways Beds rest on Cornbrash.

4. The upper part of the Great Oolite Series is in Blisworth Clay facies. The “Limestone” is raggy and non-oolitic.

5. The Great Oolite rests directly on bituminous shales which are believed to be of early Upper Lias date. The Middle and Lower Lias are well developed, but the latter is attenuated as a whole. There is a possible representative of the Lower Rhaetic.

6. The Trias is represented by varicoloured marls (Keuper) upon pale grey sandstone (probably Bunter). The latter rests directly on pre-Cambrian rocks comparable with tuffs and agglomerates of Chamwood.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , February 1947 , pp. 2 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arkell, W. J., 1933. The Jurassic System in Great Britain, Oxford.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J., 1936. Report on Ammonites collected at Long Stanton, Cambs., and on the Age of the Ampthill Clay. Summ. Prog. Geol. Surv. for 1935, 64–86.Google Scholar
Boswell, P. G. H., 1929. Cretaceous System. Handbook of the Geology of Great Britain, 383–396.Google Scholar
Kitchin, F. L., and Pringle, J., 1932. The Stratigraphical Relations of the Red Rock at Hunstanton. Geol. Mag., lxix, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, G. M., 1946. The Exploration for Oil in Great Britain and its Economic Consequences. Abbot Memorial Lecture, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Lees, G. M., and Taitt, A. H., 1946. The Geological Results of the Search for Oilfields in Great Britain. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., ci, 255–317.Google Scholar
Pringle, J., 1923. On the Concealed Mesozoic Rocks in South-West Norfolk. Summ. Prog. Geol. Surv. for 1922, 126–139.Google Scholar
Rastall, R. H., 1919. The Mineral Composition of the Lower Greensand Strata of Eastern England. Geol. Mag., lvi, 211–220, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastall, R. H., 1930. The Petrography of the Hunstanton Red Rock. Geol. Mag., lxvii, 436–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spath, L. F., 1924. Ammonites of the Speeton Clay and the Subdivisions of the Neocomian. Geol. Mag., lxi, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, W., and Jukes-Browne, A. J., 1899. The Geology of the Borders of the Wash. Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar