Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:20:50.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Danubian deviations and mantle diapirism: a possible origin of the Carpathian Arc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. R. Crawford
A. R. Crawford
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mantle diapirism centred in Transylvania is suggested as the explanation of the Carpathian Arc and the Pannonian Depression, deviation of the Danube from a formerly straight course, and the trends of the Eastern Alps and horsts and troughs in the Bohemian Massif and Poland. Central location in Transylvania is at the crossing-point of deep fractures, parts of great circles, most conspicuously displayed in Transcaucasia and along the Zagros Main Thrust line. Mantle diapirism extended westward from Transylvania along each lineament in Hungary. Pannonian deep lithosphere may be a subcrustally thinned extension of the Bohemian Massif, with a relict unthinned fragment appearing as the Dobrogean Massif. This extended massif would originally have lain almost parallel to the western boundary of the Russian Platform and to the present Dinaride belt.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 114 , Issue 2 , March 1977 , pp. 115 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ádám, A. 1965. Einige Hypothesen uber den Aufbau des Oberen Erdmentels in Ungarn. Gerlands Beitr. Geophys. 74, 20.Google Scholar
Bisztricsányi, E. & Egyed, L. 1973. The determination of LVL depth from data of spaced seismologicl. stations. Geophys. Trans. Hung. Geophys. Inst. R. Eotvos 21, 1–4.Google Scholar
Bleahu, M. D., Boccaletti, M., Manetti, P. & Peltz, S. 1973. Neogene Carpathian arc: a continental arc displaying the features of an ‘island arc’. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 5025–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccaletti, M., Manetti, M., Peccerillo, A. & Peltz, S. 1973. Young volcanism in the Calimani-Harghita mountains (East Carpathians): evidence of a paleoseismic zone. Tectonophysics 19, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. R. 1972. Iran, Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics. 24th Internat. Geol. Congr., Montreal 3, 106–112.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. F., Pitman, W. C. III, Ryan, W. B. F. & Bonnin, J. 1973. Plate tectonics and the evolution of the Alpine System. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 84, 3137–80.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, W. R. & Hatherton, T. 1967. Andesitic volcanism and seismicity around the Pacific. Science 157, 801–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furon, R. 1941. Geologie du plateau Iranien (Perse—Afghanistan—Beloutchistan). Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Paris, N.S. 7 (2), 177–414.Google Scholar
von Gaertner, H. R. & Walther, H. W. (Co-ordinators) 1971.International Geological Map of Europe and the Mediterranean Region 1:5 M. International Geological Congress, Commission for the Geological Map of the World. Published by Bundesanstalt für Bodenforschung and UNESCO.Google Scholar
Gansser, A. 1955. New aspects of the geology in Central Iran. Proc. 4th World Petrol. Congr. Sec. 1 (A), 5, 279–98.Google Scholar
Green, D. H. & Ringwood, A. E. 1968. Genesis of the calc-alkaline igneous rock suite. Contr. Miner. Petrol. 18, 105–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F. 1949. Seismicity of the Earth. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horváth, F. 1974. Application of plate tectonics to the Carpatho-Pannon Region; A Review. Acta. Geol. Acam. Scient. Hung. 18, 243–55.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1935. Earthquakes and Mountains. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lexa, J. & Konečný, V. 1974. The Carpathian volcanic arc: A discussion. Acta. Geol. Acad. Scient. Hung. 18, 279–93.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. P. 1970. Plate tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Nature, Lond. 226, 239–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radulescu, D. P. & Sandulescu, M. 1973. The plate tectonics concept and the geological structure of the Carpathians. Tectonophysics 16, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, C. 1970. Seismicity in Romania – evidence for the sinking lithosphere. Nature, Lond. 228, 1176–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roman, C. 1973. Rigid plates, buffer plates and subplates – Comment on ‘Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean region’ by D. P. McKenzie, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 33, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shatskiy, N. S. (Principal Compiler) 1962. Mezhdunarodnaya tekonicheskaya karta Evrazii, 1:2,5 M. International Geological Congress, Commission for Geological Map of World. Published by Ministry of Geology, Moscow.Google Scholar
Stegena, L. 1971. Glubinnoe stroeniye i geotermicheskie usslovia v Vengri. Ann. Univ. Sci. Bud. deR. Eötvös nom. Sec. Geol. 14, (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Stegena, L. 1974. Geothermics and Tectogenesis in the Pannonian Basin.Acta Geol. Acad. Scient. Hung. 18, 257–66.Google Scholar
Stegena, L., Geczy, B., & Horváth, F. 1975. Late Cenozoic evolution of the Pannonian Basin. Tectonophysics 26, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöcklin, J. 1968. Structural history and tectonics of Iran: A Review. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 52, 1229–58.Google Scholar
Stöcklin, J. 1974. Possible ancient continental margins in Iran. In The Geology of Continental Margins (ed. Burk, C. A. and Drake, C. L.), pp. 873–87. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szádesczky-Kardoss, E. 1968. Structure and Evolution of the Earth. Budapest: Akad. Kiads, (In Hungarian).Google Scholar
Taylor, S. R., Kaye, M., White, A. J. R., Duncan, A. R. & Ewart, A. 1969. Genetic significance of Co, Cr, Ni, Sc & V content of andesites. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 33, 275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar