Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:58:33.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cretaceous Limestones of Jamaica and their Mollusca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. T. Trechmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most of the exposures of Cretaceous Limestone in Jamaica were faithfully indicated on the Geological Survey map of Sawkins and Brown in 1865. They are limited in extent and occur at certain places among the complex of the older or Blue Mountain series of rocks that project from beneath the covering of White Limestone that covers the greater part of the Island. Contrary to one's common experience in many European countries the Cretaceous beds in Jamaica do not approach the sea coast in any part except near Port Antonio on the north-east coast, where the Trappean shales reach the sea; near St. Ann's Bay, about the centre; and at Green Island, on the north-west coast, where the Barrettia Limestone occurs within 2 miles of the sea. Elsewhere the sea coast is occupied by the White Limestone or beds that overlie it, with the exception of stretches along the north coast around Lucea Harbour and between Port Maria and Annotta Bay, occupied by the Carbonaceous Shales of Lower Eocene age.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 61 , Issue 9 , September 1924 , pp. 385 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 385 note 1 “ Reports on the Geology of Jamaica ”: Mem. Geol. Surv. London, 1869.Google Scholar

page 386 note 1 “ Geol. and Phys. Geogr. of Jamaica ”: Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. xxxiv, 1899, p. 42.Google Scholar

page 387 note 1 “ The Barrettia Beds of Jamaica ”: Geol. Mag., Vol. LIX, Nov., 1922, pp. 501–14.Google Scholar

page 387 note 2 Geol. Mag., Vol. LIX, No. 699, Sept., 1922, pp. 422–31.Google Scholar

page 392 note 1 Compte rendu sommaire des séances de la société géologique de France, 18th Dec., 1922, pp. 203–4.Google Scholar

page 394 note 1 According to A. Toucas the type of the genus is O. bioculata of the Lower Campanian of Montagne des Cornes. The most ancient form is O. requieni Math. of the Lower Angoumian, and the most recent is O. castroi Vidal of the Lower Danian. (Mem. Soc. Geol. France, Tome xi, Fasc. 2, Mem. No. 30, 1903, p. 15.)

page 394 note 2 Among Old World faunas, as Douvillé states, in the Radiolitidae the ligament is lost very late, disappearing in the Dordonian; while among the Biradiolitidae it is lost in most species in the Turonian.

page 394 note 3 Geol. Mag., Vol. LXI, No. 721, 07, 1924, pp. 312–24; and ditto, Vol. LX, No. 707, 05, 1923, pp. 199–216.Google Scholar

page 394 note 4 Ann. and Mag. Nat. History, ser. IX, vol. X, pp. 534–41; and ditto, ser. IX, vol. xiii, pp. 81–93.Google Scholar

page 394 note 5 Bull. American Mus. Nat. History, vol. ix, art. xii, pp. 185–96, pls. vi–xxii, 1897.Google Scholar

page 397 note 1 Sur quelques Rudistes a canaux ”: Bull. Soc. Geol, Fr., ser. IV, t. iv, 1904, pp. 519–38.Google Scholar

page 400 note 1 “ Sur un nouveau Genre de Radiolites ”: Bull. Soc. Geol. France, 4e serie, tome ii, 1902, p. 478, pl. xv, figs. 9–12.Google Scholar

page 400 note 2 Handb. der Palaeontologie, abt. i, band ii, p. 79.Google Scholar

page 400 note 3 Palaeontologie Francaise, tome iv, 1847, p. 189.Google Scholar

page 403 note 1 “ Some Upper Cretaceous Shells of the Rudist group from Tamaulipas, Mexico ”: Proc. U.S. Nat. Museum, vol. lxi, art. i, 1922, p. 4, pls. i–viii.Google Scholar

page 404 note 1 Boletin Institute Geologico de Mexico, Num. 24, 1906, p. 60, pls. v, xi, and xii.Google Scholar

page 404 note 2 Douvillé, H., Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 4e serie, t. ii, 1902, pl. xv, figs. 6, 7.Google Scholar

page 406 note 1 White, Chas. A., Bull. U.S. Geological Survey, vol. iii, 1885, p. 10, pls. i–iv.Google Scholar

page 407 note 1 “ La fauna de moluscos del Senoniano de Cardenas ”: Bol. Instituto geologico de Mexico, Num. 24, 1906, p. 54, pls. vi, xi–xiii, and xv.Google Scholar

page 407 note 2 Cf. Monopleura forojuliensis Pirona. Mem. del R. Instituto Veneto, vol. xxii, 1884, p. 697, pl. vii, figs. 5–14.Google Scholar

page 408 note 1 Böse, E., “ Algunas Faunas del Cretacico Superior de Coahuila ”: Instituto Geologico de Mexico, num. 30, 1913, p. 48, pl. viii, figs. 7–17.Google Scholar