Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:20:28.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Classification of the Ordovician Rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

G. L. Elles
G. L. Elles
Affiliation:
Reader in Geology in University of Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The classification of the British Ordovician Rocks has gone through many phases of instability in the past, and at the present time seems to be passing through another such phase. There are probably many causes contributing to this state of things, two of which seem to be fundamental; the first, the differentfacies of development exhibited in different districts by the formations making up the system; the second, the varied elements entering into the composition of the shallow water faunas apart from the considerations of facies; these would seem to be governed largely by possibilities of migration into the British region of the Lower Palaeozoic geosyncline from different directions, i.e. from America, from Northern Europe, and from Central Europe, so that a different type of “shelly” fauna characterizes the north-west and south-east margins.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 74 , Issue 11 , November 1937 , pp. 481 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Elles, G. L., 1922. “The Graptolite Faunas of the British Isles,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxxiii, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elles, G. L., 1922. “The Bala Country: its Structure and Rock Succession,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxviii, p. 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elles, G. L., 1933. “The Lower Ordovician Graptolite Fauna with special reference to the Skiddaw Slates,” Summary of Progress, Geol. Survey for 1932, part 2, p. 94.Google Scholar
Hadding, A. “Undre Dicellograptusskiflern i Skåne,” Lunds Univ. Årsshr., N.F., Afd. 2, Bd. ix, No. 15.Google Scholar
Hicks, H., 1866. “Classification of St. David's Succession,” Pop. Sci. Review, v, p. 1.Google Scholar
Hicks, H., 1875. “The Succession of Ancient Rocks in the Vicinity of St. David's, Pembrokeshire, with special reference to those of Arenig and Llandeilo,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxi, p. 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtedahl, O., 1909. “Studien über die Etage 4 des norwegischen Silur-system bei Mjösen,” Vid. Selsk. Skr., 1, no. 7.Google Scholar
Jones, O. T., 1933. “The Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of Britain,” Rept. 16th Int. Geol. Congress, Washington.Google Scholar
King, W. B. R., 1923. “The Upper Ordovician Rocks of the S.W. Berwyn Hills,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxix, p. 487.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C., 1878. “The Moffat Series,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxiv, p. 240.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C., 1879 a. “The Tripartite Classification of the Lower Palaeozoic Rocks,” Geol. Mag., XVI, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapworth, C., 1879 b–1880. “The Geological Distribution of the Rhabdophora,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, vols. iii, iv, v, vi.Google Scholar
Lapworth, C., 1882. “The Girvan Succession,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxviii, p. 53.Google Scholar
Marr, J. E., 1905. “Classification of the Sedimentary Rocks, ” (Pres. Address) Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxi, p. lxi.Google Scholar
Marr, J. E., 1913. “The Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of the Cautley District (Yorks),” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxix, p. 1,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J. E., 1916. “The Ashgillian Succession in the Tract to the west of Coniston Lake,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxi, p. 189.Google Scholar
Moberg, J. C., 1911. “The Silurian Rocks of Sweden,” Sver. Geol. Undersõk., Ser. C, no. 22.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I., 1833. “ On the Structure and Classification of the Transition Rocks of Shropshire, Herefordshire, and part of Wales,” Proc. Geol. Soc., London, ii, p. 13.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I., 1839. The Silurian System, London.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I., 1867, 1872. Siluria. London (Ed. 4 and 5).Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., and Horne, J. “The Silurian Rocks of Britain. Vol. i, Scotland,” Mem. Geol. Surv. United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. W., and Whitehead, T. H., 1935. “The Welsh Borderland,” British Regional Geology (Geol. Survey).Google Scholar
Smith, B., and George, T. N., 1935. “North Wales,” British Regional Geology (Geol. Survey).Google Scholar
Strahan, A., Cantrill, T. C., Dixon, E. E. L., and Thomas, H. H., 1909. “The Country around Carmarthen,” Mem. Geol. Survey.Google Scholar
Strahan, A., Cantrill, T. C., Dixon, E. E. L., Thomas, H. H., and Jones, O. T., 1914. “The Country around Haverfordwest,” Mem. Geol. Survey.Google Scholar
Törnquist, S., 1884. “Siljansområdets Trilobitfauna,” Sver. Geol. Undersõk., ser. C, no. 66.Google Scholar
Warburg, E., 1925. “The Trilobites of the Leptaena Limestone in Dalarne,” Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, xvii.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F., 1931. “The Rocks of the Shelve Country, Shropshire,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xlii, p. 322.Google Scholar