Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:45:42.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The chronology of the geological record 1985

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. B. Harland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Reviews
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 124 , Issue 4 , July 1987 , pp. 373 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Snelling, N. J. (ed.) The Chronology of the Geological Record Geological Society of London Memoir no. 10. viii+343 pp. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. (This reference is abbreviated to CGR 85.)Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V. & Flynn, J. J. Jurassic to Paleogene geochronology and chronostratigraphy. 141–86.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V. & Van Couvering, J. A. The Neogene: Part 2, Neogene geochronology and chronostratigraphy. 211–50 & [references] 251–60.Google Scholar
Brown, G. C. 1985. Processes and problems in the continental lithosphere: geological history and physical implications. 326–4.Google Scholar
Claver, N. & Hoffert, M. Sr isotopic constraints for the sedimentation rate of deep sea red clays in the southern Pacific Ocean. 290–6.Google Scholar
Cowie, J. W. & Johnson, M. R. W. Late Precambrian and Cambrian geological time scale. 47–64.Google Scholar
Curry, D. 1985. Oceanic magnetic lineaments and the calibration of the late Mesozoic–Cenozoic time scale. 269–72.Google Scholar
Dodson, M. H. & Mcclelland-Brown, E. Isotopic and palaeomagnetic evidence for rates of cooling, uplift and erosion. 315–25.Google Scholar
Forster, S. C. & Warrington, G. Geochronology of the Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic. 99–113.Google Scholar
Gale, N. H. 1985. Numerical calibration of the Palaeozoic time scale, Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian periods. 81–8.Google Scholar
Gregor, C. B. 1985. The mass age distribution of Phanerozoic sediments. 284–9.Google Scholar
Hallam, A., Hancock, J. M., La Brecque, J. L., Lowrie, W. & Channell, J. E. T. Jurassic to Paleogene: Part I. Jurassic and Cretaceous geochronology and Jurassic to Paleogene magnetostratigraphy. 118–40.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1985. The ammonoid time scale and ammonoid evolution. 273–83.Google Scholar
Jager, E. 1985. Geochronology in the Central Alps: dating of metamorphism, subsequent cooling with Oligocene glaciation, and the development of the recent landscape. 312–14.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. G., Bowen, D. Q., Adams, C. G., Shackleton, N. J., Brassell, S. C. The Neogene: Part 1. 199–210 & [references] 251–260.Google Scholar
Kunk, M. J., Sutter, J., Obradovich, J. D. & Lanphere, M. A. Age of biostratigraphic horizons within the Ordovician and Silurian systems. 89–92.Google Scholar
Mckerrow, W. S., Lambert, R. St. J. & Cocks, L. R. M. The Ordovician Silurian and Devonian periods. 73–80.Google Scholar
Moorbath, S. & Taylor, P. N. Precambrian geochronology and the geological record. 10–28.Google Scholar
Obradovich, J. [appendices to Jurassic to Paleogene: Part 2]. Appendix I Age of Kap Brewster basalt flow. Appendix II, Appendix III, magnetobiochronology of late Cretaceous stage boundaries (Maastrichtian–Campanian and Campanian–Santonian). 187–195.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S. Some key rules for the calibration of the numerical time scale. 41–6.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S. Remarks on the numerical scale of Ordovician to Devonian times. 93–8.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S. Comments on the geochronology of the Carboniferous to Triassic times. 114–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odin, G. S. Concerning the numerical ages proposed for the Jurassic and Cretaceous geochronology. 196–8.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S., Gale, N. H. & DorÉ, F. Radiometric dating of Late Precambrian times. 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R. G. H. & Johnson, G. D. 1985. Rates of Neogene depositional and deformational processes, north-west Himalayan foredeep margin, Pakistan. 297–311.Google Scholar
Snelling, N. J. Geochronology and the geological record. 3–9.Google Scholar
Snelling, N. J. An interim time scale. 261–5.Google Scholar
Wright, A. E. Subdivision of the Precambrian. 29–40.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. L. 1978. Pre-Cenozoic Phanerozoic time scale – computer file of critical dates and consequences of new and in progress decay-constant revisions. In Contributions to the Geological Time Scale (eds. Cohee, G. V. et al. ), pp. 73–91. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Studies in Geology Series no. 6.Google Scholar
Bassett, M. G. 1985. Towards a ‘common language’ in stratigraphy. Episodes 8 (2), 87–92.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1971. Tertiary boundaries. In The Micropalaeontology of the Oceans (eds. Funnell, B. F., Riedel, W. R.), pp. 693–808. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1978. Recent advances in Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy, biochronology, and biogeography: Atlantic Ocean. Micropalaeontology 24 (4), 337–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, J. W. 1986. Guidelines and statutes of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt a. M. 83, 1–14.Google Scholar
Hambrey, M. J. 1983. Correlation of Late Proterozoic tillites in the North Atlantic region and Europe. Geological Magazine 120 (3), 209–320.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1974. The Pre-Cambrian–Cambrian boundary. In Cambrian of the British Isles, Norden and Spitsbergen. Lower Palaeozoic rocks of the World, Vol. 2 (ed. Holland, C. H.), pp. 14–42. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1975. The two geological time scales. Nature 253, 505–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1983. More time scales. Geological Magazine 120 (4), 393–400.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Cox, A. V., Llewellyn, P. G., Pickton, C. A. G., Smith, A. G. & Walters, R. 1982. A Geologic Time Scale 1982. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. & Francis, H. (eds). 1971. The Phanerozoic Time Scale – a Supplement. Geological Society of London Special Publication no. 5, 356 pp.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Smith, A. G. & Wilcock, B. (eds). 1964. The Phanerozoic Time Scale (A symposium dedicated to Professor Arther Holmes). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 120, 458 pp. (Special Publication no. 1).Google Scholar
Odin, G. S. (ed.) 1982. Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy Part I & Part II (2 volumes). Chichester: Wiley. 1040 pp.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S., Gale, N. H., Auvray, B., Bielski, M., DORÉ, F., Lancelot, J. R. & Pasteels, P. 1983. Numerical dating of the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary. Nature 301, 21–3.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. (compiler) 1983. The Decade of North American Geology, 1983, Geologic Time Scale. Geology 11, 503–4.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snelling, N. J. 1982. Chronology of the Geological Record. Episodes 1982 (2), 26–7.Google Scholar