Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:04:33.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chief Heavy Detrital Minerals in the Rocks of the English Midlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. F. Fleet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The chief features exhibited by the heavy mineral residues from the various formations will now be summarized, but it is difficult to show, by tabulating or otherwise, the differences or resemblances between residues, although such may be quite obvious to the investigator. This is because the differences consist of a sum total of variations in size, shape, colour, and frequency of the mineralscontained in the residues under examination, and it is scarcely possible to indicate such differences in writing, without frequent repetition of words, there by involving a loss in clarity of expression, or if tables be employed, without losing sight of other connected data.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , March 1925 , pp. 98 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Fleet, W. F., “Notes on the Triassic Sands near Birmingham with special reference to their Heavy Detrital Minerals”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xxxiv, 1923, pp. 114–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.H.M. Geol. Survey, Summary of Progress for 1920, p. 10.Google Scholar
3.“Notes on the Triassic Sands near Birmingham with special reference to their Heavy Detrital Minerals”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., pp. 12–15.Google Scholar
4.Lapworth, C., “A Sketch of the Geology of the Birmingham District”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xv, 1898, p. 344.Google Scholar
5.“A Sketch of the Geology of the Birmingham District”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., pp. 335–52.Google Scholar
6.“A Sketch of the Geology of the Birmingham District”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., pp. 357–9.Google Scholar
7.“The Geology of the Country around Coventry, etc.”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1923, pp. 22–41.Google Scholar
8.Eastwood, T., “The Geology of the Country around Coventry, etc.”: Mem. Geol. Surv., pp. 76–87.Google Scholar
9.King, W. W., and Lewis, W. J., Geol. Mao., 1912, pp. 437–43 and 484–91.Google Scholar
10.Geol. Mao., p. 488.Google Scholar
11.Stamp, D., “The Base of the Devonian”: Geol. Mag., Vol. LX, 1923, pp. 367–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.King, W. W., and Lewis, W. J., Proc. Birm. Nat. Hist, and Phil. Soc., vol. xiv, pt. ii, 1917, p. 90.Google Scholar
13.H.M. Geol. Survey, Summary of Progress for 1919, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
14.Proc. Birm. Nat. Hist, and Phil. Soc., p. 13.Google Scholar
15.H.M. Geol. Survey, Summary of Progress for 1922, p. 29.Google Scholar
16.Abs. Proc. Geol. Soc., No. 1075, 1921–1922, Nov. 1921.Google Scholar
17.King, W. W., “The Plexography of South Staffordshire in Avonian Time”: Trans. Inst. Min. Eng., vol. lxi, 1921.Google Scholar
18.King, W. W., Berrows' Worc. Journal, 2nd 07, 1921.Google Scholar
19.Lapworth, C., and Watts, W. W., “Shropshire”: Geology in the Field (Geol. Assoc.), p. 761.Google Scholar
20.H.M. Geol. Survev, Summary of Progress for 1921, p. 29.Google Scholar
21.T. H. Whitehead, “Shropshire”: Geology in the Field, pp. 169–73.Google Scholar
22.Kay, H., “On the Halesowen Sandstone Series of the South Staffordshire Coalfield, etc.”: Q.J.G.S., vol. lxix, 1913, pp. 433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.“On the Halesowen Sandstone Series of the South Staffordshire Coalfield, etc.”: Q.J.G.S., p. 444.Google Scholar
24.Kay, H., “From Coal Measures to Trias in the West Bromwich-Sandwells-Hamstead area”: Proc Birm. Nat. Hist, and Phil. Soc., vol. xiv, pt., iv, 1921, p. 149.Google Scholar
25.“From Coal Measures to Trias in the West Bromwich-Sandwells-Hamstead area”: Proc Birm. Nat. Hist, and Phil. Soc., pp. 154–5.Google Scholar
26.King, W. W., “The Permian Conglomerates of the Lower Severn Basin”: Q.J.G.S., vol. lv, 1899, pp. 103–4 and 108–11.Google Scholar
27.“The Permian Conglomerates of the Lower Severn Basin”: Q.J.G.S.., pp. 104–8 and 110–11.Google Scholar
28.“The Permian Conglomerates of the Lower Severn Basin”: Q.J.G.S., p. 114.Google Scholar
29.“The Permian Conglomerates of the Lower Severn Basin”: Q.J.G.S., pp. 116–17.Google Scholar
30.“The Permian Conglomerates of the Lower Severn Basin”: Q.J.G.S., p. 117.Google Scholar
31.“The Permian Conglomerates of the Lower Severn Basin”: Q.J.G.S., p. 112.Google Scholar
32.Hardaker, W. H., “The Permian Rocks of Hamstead”: Q.J.G.S., vol. lxviii, 1912, pp. 639–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Boulton, W. S., “On a Recently Discovered Breccia Bed underlying Nechells (Birmingham) and its Relations to the Red Rocks of the District”: Abs. Proc. Geol. Soc., No. 1112, 31st Jan., 1924, and Q.J.G.S., vol. lxxx, 1924, pp. 343–73.Google Scholar
34.“The Geology of the Country around Lichfield”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1919, chap. vi.Google Scholar
35.H.M. Geol. Survey, Summary of Progress for 1910, p. 18.Google Scholar
36.H.M. Geol. Survey, Summary of Progress for 1911, pp. 25–6.Google Scholar
37.Brown, H. T., “On the Permian Rocks of the Leicester Coalfield”: Q.J.G.S., vol. xlv, 1889, p. 1 et seq.Google Scholar
38.Hull, E., “The Triassic and Permian Rocks of the Midland Counties of England”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1869, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
39.“The Triassic and Permian Rocks of the Midland Counties of England”: Mem. Geol. Surv., pp. 21–2.Google Scholar
40.Landon, J., “The Barr Beacon Beds”: Proc. Birm. Phil. Soc., vol. vii, pt. i.Google Scholar
41.Lapworth, C., and Watts, W. W., “The Geology of South Shropshire”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xiii, 1894, pp. 319–20.Google Scholar
42.“The Geology of South Shropshire”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., pp. 320, 322.Google Scholar
43.Cantrill, T. C., ‘Contribution to the Geology of the Wyre Forest Coal-field, etc.,’ p. 19.Google Scholar