Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:02:49.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy of the Dianzishang section, Zhenning, Guizhou, South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2013

YUPING QI ,
KEYI HU ,
QIULAI WANG  and
WEI LIN
YUPING QI*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
KEYI HU
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
QIULAI WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
WEI LIN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A preliminary summary of the lower Visean to uppermost Moscovian (Carboniferous) conodont succession and biostratigraphy of the Dianzishang section in Zhenning, Guizhou, South China is presented. Eleven conodont zones, in ascending order, can be recognized: Gnathodus praebilineatus, Gnathodus bilineatus, Lochriea ziegleri, Declinognathodus noduliferus, Neognathodus symmetricus, ‘Streptognathodus’ expansus (primitive form), ‘Streptognathodus’ expansus, Mesogondolella donbassica – Mesogondolella clarki, Idiognathodus podolskensis, Swadelina fauna and Idiognathodus swadei zones. The first occurrences of Lochriea ziegleri at the base of the Serpukhovian Stage, Declinognathodus noduliferus noduliferus at the base of the Bashkirian Stage and ‘Streptognathodus’ expansus at the base of the Moscovian Stage are recognized. The definitions of these stage boundaries, as well as that of the base of the Kasimovian Stage are discussed. Correlations with the Naqing section in South China, Russian and North American sections, as well as other important sections in the world, are considered.

Keywords

Carboniferousconodont biostratigraphyDianzishang sectionGuizhouSouth China
Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 151 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 311 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alekseev, A. S. & Goreva, N. V. 2000. The Conodont Scale for the Moscovian, Kasimovian, and Gzhelian Stages. In Zonal'nye podrazdeleniya karbona obshchei stratigrafi cheskoi shkaly Rossii. Materialy Vserossiiskogo sovesh chaniya (Carboniferous Zonal Units of the General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia. Materials of the All Russian Meeting), pp. 7–8. Ufa, Gilem.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Isokova, T. N. & Makhlina, M. Kh. 2003. Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous of the Moscow syneclise (Russia). XVth International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy Abstracts, 13–15.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Isokova, T. N. & Makhlina, M. Kh. 2004. Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous in the Mosow Syneclise, Russia. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 22, 28–35.Google Scholar
Austin, R. L. & Husri, S. 1974. Dinantian conodont faunas of County Clare, County Limerick and County Leitrim. In International Symposium on Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Viséan, Namur, 3 (eds Bouckaert, J. & Streel, M.), pp. 18–69. Geological Survey of Belgium, Brussels.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E. & Heckel, P. H. 2000. A provisional Conodont zonation for Late Pennsylvanian (late Late Carboniferous) strata in Midcontinent region of North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 18, 15–22.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E., Lambert, L. L., Heckel, P. H. & Boardman, D. R. 2004. Pennsylvanian conodont zonation for midcontinent North America. Revista Espanola de Micropaleontologia 36, 231–50.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E., Qi, Y. P. & Wang, Z. H. 2010. Latest Moscovian to Earliest Gzhelian (Pennsylvanian) conodont faunas from the Naqing (Nashui) section, South Guizhou, China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D. et al.), pp. 78–107. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology (Chinese Academy of Sciences).Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S. 1984. Upper Carboniferous and Permian (Asselian) conodont zonation and zonal scale and problems of its perfection. In Verkhnii Karbon SSSR. Mezhvedomstvennyi Stratigraficheskii Komitet SSSR. Trudy. T. 13 (Upper Carboniferous of the USSR. Proceedings of the Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Committee of the USSR), pp. 102–7. Nauka, Moscow, 13.Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S., Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Kononova, L. I. & Migdisova, A. V. 1984. Carboniferous conodont zonation of the East European Platform. In Paleontologicheskaya kharakteristika stratotipicheskikh i opornykh razrezov karbona Moskovskoi sineklizy (Paleontological Characteristic of Carboniferous Stratotype and Reference Sections in the Moscow Syneclise), pp.143–51. Moscow University Press, Moscow.Google Scholar
Belka, Z. 1985. Lower Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy in the northern part of the Moravia-Silesia Basin. Acta Geologica Polonica 35, 1–60.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1957. Die Conodonten-Stratigraphie des rheno-herzynischen Unterkarbons mit Berücksichtigung der Wocklumeria-Stufe und der Karbon/Devon-Grenze. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung 19, 1–64.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. & Mehl, M. G. 1938. Conodonts from the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, in stratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, Part II. University of Missouri Studies 13 (3), 128–48.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. & Mehl, M. G. 1941. New and little known Carboniferous conodont genera. Journal of Paleontology 15, 97–106.Google Scholar
Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Guizhou Province. 1987. Regional Geology of Guizhou Province. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 698 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Clarke, W. J. 1960. Scottish carboniferous conodonts. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society 18, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davydov, V. L. 2001. The terminal stage of the carboniferous: Orenburgian versus Bursumian. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 58–64.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. L. 1966. New Pennsylvanian platform conodonts from southwestern United States. Journal of Paleontology 40, 1294–303.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. L. 1970. Conodont zonation near the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian boundary in western United States. Geological Society of America Bulletin 81, 2959–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, S. P. & Graves, R. W. 1941. Lower Pennsylvanian (dimple limestone) conodonts of the Marathon region, Texas. Missouri, University, School of Mines and Metallurgy, Bulletin, Technical Series 14, 1–13.Google Scholar
Furduj, R. S. 1975. Oraschlenenii karbona Yuzhnogo Urala po konodontam (On the division of the carboniferous of the South Urals by conodonts). In Stratigrafia i Biogeografia Morei i Sushi Kamennougolnogo Perioda na Territorii SSSR (Stratigraphy and Biogeography of the Sea and Land in the Territory of the USSR during the Carboniferous Period) (ed Einor, O. L.), pp. 104–8, Vyshcha Shkola, Kiev (in Russian).Google Scholar
Goreva, N. V. 1984. Conodonts of the Moscovian Stage of the Moscow Syncline. In Paleontological Characteristic of the Types and Key Section of the Moscow Syncline (ed Menner, V. V.), pp. 44–122. Moscow State University Press, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Goreva, N. V. & Alekseev, A. S. 2010. Upper Carboniferous conodont zones of Russia and their global correlation. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 18 (6), 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goreva, N. V., Alekseev, A. S., Isakova, T. I. & Kossovaya, O. 2009. Biostratigraphical analysis of the Moscovian-Kasimovian transition at the neostratotype of Kasimovian Stage (Afanasievo section, Moscow Basin, Russia). Palaeoworld 18, 102–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, R. E. Jr. 1984. Morrowan and Atokan (Pennsylvanian) conodonts from the northeastern margin of the Arbuckle Mountains, southern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geologieal Survey Bulletin 136, 41–63.Google Scholar
Groves, J. & Task Group. 2006. Report to the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 24, 6–7.Google Scholar
Groves, J. & Task Group. 2008. Report of the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 26, 10–11.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R., Wang, Y., Qi, Y. P., Richards, B. C., Ueno, K. & Wang, X. D. 2012. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Visean-Serpukhovian (Mississippian) boundary interval at slope and platform sections in southern Guizhou (South China). Journal of Paleontology 86 (5), 753–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. W. & Hollingsworth, R. V. 1933. New Pennsylvanian conodonts from Oklahoma. American Journal of Science 25, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1953. Conodonts of the Barnett Formation of Texas. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 243-F, 69–94.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 2004. Updated cyclothem grouping chrt and observations on the grouping of Pennsylvanian cyclothems in Midcontinent North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 22, 18–22.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H., Boardman, D. R., Barrick, J. E. 2002. Desmoinesian-Missourian regional stage boundary references position for North America. In Carboniferous and Permian of the World. (eds Hills, L. V. & Henderson, C. M.), pp. 710–24. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir no. 19.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1975. Conodont zonation of the late Viséan-early Westphalian strata of the south and central Pennines of northern England. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Great Britain 53, 1–90.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1985. The Carboniferous System. Part 2: conodonts of the Silesian subsystem from Great Britain and Ireland. In A Stratigraphical Index of Conodonts (eds Higgins, A. C. & Austin, R. L.), pp. 210–27. British Micropalaeontological Society Series.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. & Bouckaert, J. 1968. Conodont stratigraphy and palaeontology of the Namurian of Belgium. Mémoire Explicative des Cartes Géologiques et Minières de la Belgique 10, 1–64.Google Scholar
Igo, H. 1974. Some Upper Carboniferous conodonts from the Akiyoshi Limestone, Southwest Japan. Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei University 26, 230–8.Google Scholar
Igo, H. & Koike, T. 1964. Carboniferous conodonts from Yobara Akiyoshi Limestone, Japan (Studies of Asiaticconodonts, Part I). Paleontological Society of Japan, Transactions and Proceedings 53, 179–93.Google Scholar
Igo, H. & Koike, T. 1965. Carboniferous conodonts from Yobara, Akiyoshi Limestone, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of Palaeontological Society of Japan, N.S. 59, 83–91.Google Scholar
Isakova, T. N., Goreva, N. V., Alekseev, A. S. & Makhlina, M. Kh. 2001. Fusulinid and Conodont Zonation of the type Moscovian Stage. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 57–8.Google Scholar
Koike, T. 1967. A Carboniferous succession of conodont faunas from the Atetsu Limestone in southwest Japan (studies of Asian Conodonts, Part IV). Science Reports of the Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku, Section C, Geology, Mineralogy and Geography 9, 279–318.Google Scholar
Kossenko, Z. A. 1975. New species of conodonts from the deposits of the Moscovian Stage of the southwestern part of the Donets Basin. Geologicheski Zhurnal 35 (5), 126–33 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kozitskaya, R. I., Kossenko, Z. A., Lipnjagov, O. M. & Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1978. Konodonty Karbona Donetskogobaseina (Carboniferous Conodonts of the Donets Basin). Naukova Dumka, Kiev, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 135 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kulagina, E. I., Pazukhin, V. N. & Davydov, V. I. 2009. Pennsylvanian biostratigraphy of the Basu River section, with emphasis on the Bashkirian-Moscovian transition. In Carboniferous Type Sections in Russia and Potential Global Stratotypes. Proceedings of the International Field Meeting ‘The historical type sections, proposed and potential GSSPs of the Carboniferous in Russia.’ Southern Urals Session . Ufa-Sibai, 13–18 August (eds Puchkov, V. N., Kulagina, E. I., Nikolaeva, S. V. & Kochetova, N. N.), pp. 64–8. Design Polygraph Service, Ltd.Google Scholar
Kulagina, E. I., Rumyantseva, Z. S., Pazukhin, V. N. & Kotchetkova, N. M. 1992. Granitsa Nizhnego-Srednego Karbona na Yuzhnom Urale i Srednem Tyanshane (Lower/Middle Carboniferous Boundary at South Urals and Middle Tianshan). Nauka, Moskva, 112 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lambert, L. L. 1992. Atokan and basal Desmoinesian conodonts from central Iowa, reference area for the Desmoinesian Stage. In Recent Advances in Middle Carboniferous Biostratigraphy: A Symposium (eds Sutherland, P. K. & Manger, W. L.), pp. 111–23. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 94.Google Scholar
Lambert, L. L., Barrick, J. E. & Heckel, P. H. 2001. Provisional Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian conodont zonation in midcontinent North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 50–55.Google Scholar
Lambert, L. L., Heckel, P. H. & Barrick, J. E. 2003. Swadelina new genus (Pennsylvanian Conodonta), a taxon with potential chronostratigraphic significance. Micropaleontology 49, 151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H. R. 1967. Uppermost Mississippian and Lower Pennsylvanian conodonts from the type Morrowan Region, Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology 41, 920–42.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. 1977. Morrowan (Early Pennsylvanian) conodonts of northwestern Arkansas and northeastern Oklahoma. In Mississipppian–Pennsylvanian Boundary in Northeastern Oklahoma and Northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma City. (eds Sutherland, P. K. & Manger, W. L.), pp.177–80. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 18.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., Baesemann, J. F., Brenckle, P. L. & West, R. R. 1985. Arrow Canyon, Nevada: a potential Mid-Carboniferous boundary stratotype. 10th International Congress, Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, Madrid, 4, 429–39.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. & Brenckle, P. L. 2001. Type Mississippian subdivision and biostratigraphic succession. In Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of the Mississippian Subsystem (Carboniferous Subsystem) in its Type Region, the Mississippian River Vally of Illinois, Missouri and Iowa (ed Heckel, P. H.), pp. 83–95. IUGS Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Guidebook for Field Conference, Sept 8–13.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., Brenckle, P. L., Baesemenn, J. F. & Richards, B. C. 1999. IUGS Carboniferous in the middle of the Carboniferous, Arrow Canyon, Nevada, USA. Episodes 22 (4), 272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H. R. & Straka, J. J. II. 1974. Late Mississippian and Early Pennsylvanian conodonts, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Geological Society of America Special Papers 152, 1–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meischner, D. & Nemyrovska, T. 1999. Origin of Gnathodus bilineatus (Roundy, 1926) related to goniatite zonation in Rhenisches Schiefergebirge, Germany. Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 37, 427–42.Google Scholar
Merrill, G. K. 1972. Taxonomy, phylogeny and biostratigraphy of Neognathodus in Appalachian Pennsylvanian rocks. Journal of Paleontology 46, 817–29.Google Scholar
Mizuno, Y. 1997. Conodont faunas across the mid-Carboniferous boundary in the Hina Limestone, southwest Japan. Paleontological Research 1, 237–59.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1978. Biostratigrafiya serpukhovskogo I bashkirskogo yarusov Donbasa po konodontam (Biostratigraphy of the Serpukhovian and Bashkirian stages of Donbas by Conodonts). Tektonika i Stratigrafia (Naukova Dumka) 14, 83–91 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1990. Samye pozdnie predstaviteli roda Declinognathodus (konodonty) v pogranichnykh otlozheniyakh bashkirskogo i moskovskogo yarusov Donetskogo baseina. (The last representatives of the genus Declinognathodus in the Bashkirian/Moscovian boundary deposits of the Donbas Carboniferous.) Paleontologischeski Zbornik 27, 39–43 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. & Alekseev, A. S. 1994. The Bashkirian conodonts of the Askyn Section, Bashkirian Mountains, Russia. Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie 103 (1–2), 109–33.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Meischner, D. 1994. Lochriea ziegleri and Lochriea senckenbergica: new conodont species from the latest Visean and Serpukhovian in Europe. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 168, 311–17.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 1999. Bashkirian conodonts of the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Scripta Geologica 119, 1–93.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 2005. Late Viséan/early Serpukhovian conodont succession from the Triollo section, Palencia (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain). Scripta Geologica 129, 13–89.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 2011. Late Moscovian (Carboniferous) conodonts of the genus Swadelina from the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemyrovskaya, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Alekseev, A. S. 1999. On Moscovian (Late Carboniferous) conodonts of the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie Abhandlungen 214 (1/2), 169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Weyant, M. 2006. The early Viséan (Carboniferous) conodonts from the Saoura Valley, Algeria. Acta Geologica Polonica 56 (3), 361–70.Google Scholar
Nigmadganov, I. M. & Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1992. Novye vidy konodontov iz pogranichnykh otlozhenij nizhnego I srednego karbona Yuzhnogo Tian-Shanya (New species of conodonts from the boundary deposits of the Lower/Middle Carboniferous of the South Tienshan). Paleontologicheskogo Zhurnal 3, 51–7 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, S. V., Gibshman, N. B., Kulagina, E. I., Barskov, I. S. & Pazukhin, V. N. 2002. Correlation of the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in its type region (Moscow Basin) and the South Urals and a proposal of boundary markers (ammonoids, foraminifers, conodonts). Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 20, 16–21.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, S. V., Kulagina, E. I., Pazukhin, V. N. & Kochetova, N. N. 2001. Integrated Serpukhovian biostratigraphy in the South Urals. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 38–43.Google Scholar
Perret, M.-F. 1993. Recherches micropaléontologiques et biostratigraphiques (Conodontes-Foraminifères) dans le Carbonifère Pyrenéen. Strata 21, 1–597.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Hu, K. Y., Barrick, J. E., Wang, Q. L. & Lin, W. 2012. Discovery of the Conodont linage from Idiognathodus swadei to I. turbatus in South China and its implications. Journal of Stratigraphy 36 (3), 551–7 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Lambert, L. L., Barrick, J. E., Groves, J. R., Wang, Z. H., Hu, K. Y. & Wang, X. D. 2010 a. New interpretation of the conodont succession of the Naqing (Nashui) section: candidate GSSP for the base of the Moscovian Stage, Luosu, Luodian, Guizhou, South China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D., Qi, Y., Groves, J., Barrick, J. et al.), pp. 65–77. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P. & Wang, Z. H. 2005. Serpukhovian conodont sequence and the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in South China. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 111 (1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D. & Lambert, L. L. 2010 b. Status report on conodonts from the Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary interval at the Naqing (Nashui) section, South China. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 28, 47–50.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Lambert, L. L., Barrick, J. E., Wang, Z. H., Hu, K. Y. & Wang, Q. L. 2011. Three potential levels for the Bashkirian and Moscovian boundary in the Naqing section based on conodonts. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 29, 61–4.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, Z. H. & Luo, H. 2004. Progress and prospect of the biostratigraphic study of the Visean-Serpukhovian Boundary Interval. Journal of Stratigraphy 28 (3), 281–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Richards, B. C., Groves, J. R., Ueno, K., Wang, Z. H., Wu, X. H. & Hu, K. Y. 2010 c. Recent progress on conodonts and foraminifers from the candidate GSSP of the Carboniferous Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in the Naqing (Nashui) section of south China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D., Qi, Y., Groves, J., Barrick, J. et al.), pp. 35–64. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Wang, Z. H., Lane, H. R., Richards, B. C., Ueno, K. & Groves, J. R. 2009. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Naqing (Nashui) section in South China: candidate GSSPs for both the Serpukhovian and Moscovian Stages. Permophiles 53, 39–40.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, Z. H., Wang, Y., Ueno, K. & Wang, X. D. 2007. Stop 1: Nashui section. In Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Carbonate Successions from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. XVI International Congress on the Carboniferous and Permian, June 21–24, Nanjing China. Guide Book for Field Excursion C3, pp. 8–16.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. H. T., Austin, R. L. & Druce, E. C. 1969. British Avonian (Carboniferous) conodont faunas, and their value in local and intercontinental correlation. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 5, 1–313.Google Scholar
Richards, B. C. & Task Group 2010. Report of the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Visean-Serpukhovian boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 28, 30–3.Google Scholar
Rosscoe, S. J. & Barrick, J. E. 2009 a. Revision of Idiognathodus species from the Desmoinesian–Missourian (~Moscovian–Kasimovian) boundary interval in the Midcontinent Basin, North America. Palaeontographica Americana 62, 115–47.Google Scholar
Rosscoe, S. J. & Barrick, J. E. 2009 b. Idiognathodus turbatus and other key taxa of the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary interval in the Midcontinent region, North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 27, 21–5.Google Scholar
Roundy, P. V. 1926. The micro-fauna in Mississippian formations of San Saba County, Texas. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 146, 1–63.Google Scholar
Sanz-López, J., Blanco-Ferrera, S., Sánchez De, Posada L. C. & García-López, S. 2006. The mid-Carboniferous boundary in northern Spain: difficulties for correlation of the global stratotype section and point. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 112, 3–22.Google Scholar
Skomposki, S., Alekseev, A., Meischner, D., Nemirovskaya, T., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Varker, W. J. 1995. Conodont distribution across the Visean/Namurian boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 188, 177–209.Google Scholar
Ueno, K. & Task Group 2009. Report of the Task Group to establish the Moscovian-Kasimovian and Kasimovian-Gzhelian boundaries. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 27, 14–18.Google Scholar
Wang, X. D. & Jin, Y. G. 2005. Achievements in the establishment of the Carboniferous GSSPs. Journal of Stratigraphy 29 (2), 147–53 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, X. D., Qi, Y. P., Lambert, L. L., Wang, Z. H., Wang, Y., Hu, K. Y., Lin, W. & Chen, B. 2011. A potential global standard stratotype-section and point of the Moscovian Stage (Carboniferous). Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) 85 (2), 366–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. H. 1996. Mid-Carboniferous boundary and the conodonts across this boundary in south Guizhou and north Guangxi. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 13 (3), 261–76 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H., Lane, H. R. & Manger, W. L. 1987. Conodont sequence across the mid-Carboniferous boundary in China and its correlation with England and North America. In Carboniferous Boundaries in China (ed Wang, C. Y.), pp. 89–106. Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H. & Qi, Y. P. 2003. Report on the Upper Visean–Serpukhovian conodont zonation in South China. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 21, 22–4.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H. & Qi, Y. P. 2007. The Upper Carboniferous conodont sequence across the Moscovian-Kasimovian boundary in South China. Acta Micropaleontologica Sinica 24, 385–92.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H., Qi, Y. P. & Wang, X. D. 2008. Stage boundaries of the Pennsylvanian in the Nashui Section, Luodian of Guizhou, south China. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 25 (3), 205–14.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H., Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D. & Wang, Y. J. 2004. Restudy of the Upper Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) strata from Nashui of Luodian, Guizhou. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 21 (2), 119–29 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, Z. S. 2000. Characteristics of the north-westward structure of Shazigou District in Zhenning, Guizhou. Guizhou Geology 17 (01), 30–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Winkler, P. C. F. 1990. SCCS Working Group on the subdivision on the Upper Carboniferous S. L. (‘Pennsylvanian’): a summary report. Courier Forschungsinstiut Senckenberg 130, 297–306.Google Scholar
Wirth, M. 1967. Zur Gliederung des höheren Paläozoikums (Givet-Namur) im Gebiet des Quinto Real (Westpyrenäen) mit Hilfe vn Conodonten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 127, 179–224.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1960. Die Conodonten aus den Geröllen des Zechsteinkonglomerates von Rossenray (südwestlich Rheinberg/Niederrhein). Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen 6, 391–405.Google Scholar