Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T06:39:49.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Upper Carboniferous Fauna from the Amotape Mountains, North-Western Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

H. Dighton Thomas
H. Dighton Thomas
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are two well-preserved internal moulds in the collection which are very close indeed to the forms referred to Meek's species by Girty, but unfortunately nothing is known of the external ornamentation of the Peruvian specimens.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 65 , Issue 5 , May 1928 , pp. 215 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES

(1) Cossmann, M. “Sur l'Evolution des Trigonies,” Ann. de Pal., vii, 1912, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
(2) Derby, O. A. “The Amazonian Upper Carboniferous Fauna,” Journ. Geol., ii, 1894, pp. 480–501.Google Scholar
(3) Diener, C. “Himalayan Fossils,” vol. i, pt. v, Pal. Ind., ser. xv, 1915.Google Scholar
(4) Etheridge, R.jun “Official Contributions to the Palaeontology of South Australia, Nos. 17, 18,” Supplement to Parliamentary Paper No. 55 of 1906, Proc. Parl. S. Australia, vol. iii, 1907.Google Scholar
(5) Geinitz, H. B. “Carbonformation und Dyas in Nebraska,” Mitt. d. k. Leopoldino-Carolinischen Akad. deut. d. Naturf., Bd. xxxiii, pp. i–xii and 1–91, 1866.Google Scholar
(6) Geinitz, H. B. “Nachträge zur Dyas, I,” Mitt. d. k. min.-geol. und praehist. Mus. in Dresden (Cassel), 1880.Google Scholar
(7) Girty, G. H. Nineteenth Annual Report U.S.G.S., 1897–1898, pt. iii, 1899, pp. 539–93.Google Scholar
(8) Girty, G. H. “Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Colorado,” U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 16, 1903.Google Scholar
(9) Girty, G. H. “The Fauna of the Phosphate Beds of the Park City Formation in Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah,” U.S.G.S. Bull. 436, 1910.Google Scholar
(10) Girty, G. H. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., vol. xx, No. 3, pt. ii, 1910.Google Scholar
(11) Girty, G. H. “The Fauna of the Moorefield Shale of Arkansas,” U.S.G.S. Bull. 439, 1911.Google Scholar
(12) Girty, G. H. “The Fauna of the Wewoka Formation of Oklahoma,” U.S.G.S. Bull. 544, 1915.Google Scholar
(13) Hall, J. “Palaeontology of Iowa,” Geol. Surv. Iowa, vol. i, pt. ii, 1858.Google Scholar
(14) Hind, W. “The British Carboniferous Lamellibranchiata,” Monog. Pal. Soc. Lond., vol. i, 1896–1900.Google Scholar
(15) Hind, W. “The British Carboniferous Lamellibranchiata,” Monog. Pal. Soc. Lond., vol. ii, 1901–1905.Google Scholar
(16) Holdhaus, K. “Sobre alguns Lamellibranchios Fosseis do Sul do Brasil,” Mon. Serv. Geol. e Min. do Brasil, vol. ii, 1919.Google Scholar
(17) Katzer, F. Grundzüge der Geologie des unteren Amazonasgebietes, Leipzig, 1903.Google Scholar
(18) Keyes, C. R. “Palaeontology of Missouri,” pt. ii, Geol. Surv. Missouri, vol. v, 1894.Google Scholar
(19) Koninck, L. G. de. “Faune du Calcaire Carbonifère de la Belgique,” ve part., Ann. Mus. Roy. d'Hist. Nat. Belg., T. xi, 1885.Google Scholar
(20) Krotow, P. “Die Artinskische Etage,” Trudui Obshchestva Estestvo-Ispuitatelei Imp. Kazan. Univ., vol. xiii, 1885.Google Scholar
(21) Meek, F. B. “Report on the Palaeontology of Eastern Nebraska, etc.,” Final Rept. U.S.G.S. Neb., 1872.Google Scholar
(22) Meek, F. B. and Hayden, F. V. “Remarks on the Lr. Cretaceous of Kansas and Nebraska, together with descriptions of some new species of Carboniferous Fossils from the Valley of Kansas River,” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1858, pp. 256–64.Google Scholar
(23) Meek, F. B. and Hayden, F. V. “Palaeontology of the Upper Missouri,” Smith. Conts. Knowledge, 172, 1864.Google Scholar
(24) Miller, S. A. Seventeenth Rept. Geol. Surv. Indiana, 1892.Google Scholar
(25) Newberry, J. S. “Palaeontology,” in lves' Rept. on Colorado Expl. Exped. of 1857–1858, 1861.Google Scholar
(26) D'Orbigny, A. Voyage dans l'Amérigue méridionale, T. iii, viii, 1842, 1847, Paris and Strassburg.Google Scholar
(27) Reed, F. R. C. “Upper Carboniferous Fossils from Argentina,” in A. L. du Toit's A Geological Comparison of S. America with S. Africa, Carnegie Inst. Washington, No. 381, 1927, pp. 129–58.Google Scholar
(28) Shumard, B. F., and Swallow, G. C. “Descriptions of new fossils from the Coal Measures of Missouri and Kansas,” Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci., vol. i, 1858, pp. 198–227.Google Scholar
(29) Waagen, W. “Salt Range Fossils,” vol. i, Pal. Ind., ser. XIII, 1887.Google Scholar
(30) Walcott, C. D. “Palaeontology of the Eureka District,” U.S.G.S. Monog. viii, 1884.Google Scholar
(31) White, C. A. “Contributions to Invertebrate Palaeontology, No. 6,” in Hayden's 12th Ann. Rept. U.S. Geol. and Geog. Surv. Terr. for 1878, pt. i, 1883.Google Scholar