Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:30:20.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternating Pleistocene Morphogenetic Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. A. Cotton
C. A. Cotton
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Victoria University College, New Zealand.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alternation of morphogenetic systems conditioned by wide swinging of climatic belts equatorward and poleward has been used to explain otherwise puzzling relict forms in many regions. A characteristic finely dissected landscape relief prevalent in some middle-latitude regions is in strong contrast with smoothed, coarse-textured, whalebacked, relatively featureless relief in others, notably western Europe, which are now in the humid-temperate zone. This latter is believed to be relict from the periglacial regimes of Pleistocene ice ages. In New Zealand where the former landscape type is typically developed, there has also been quite strong “periglaciation”, and in Europe running-water erosion cannot but have operated to some extent in interglacial ages. It appears that the periglacial smoothing has been pushed to the extreme limit in Europe but that its effects have been neutralized in New Zealand by the vigour of dissection in the alternating warm ages. Periglacial smothering, or “fossilization”, of fine-textured relief, which has been followed by renewed fine dissection, is very common at Wellington, New Zealand. The reasons are not clear why running water should have been (and should still be) more efficient in dissecting the New Zealand landscape than that of Europe, so that the relict periglacial landscape remains intact in the latter region.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , April 1958 , pp. 125 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baulig, H., 1957. Peneplains and pediplains, Geol. Soc. America, Bull., lxviii, 913–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cailleux, A., 1948. Le ruissellement en pays tempéré non-montagneux, Ann. Géogr., lvii, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cailleux, A., 1950. Écoulements liquides en nappes et aplanissements, Rev. Géom. dyn., i, 245–70.Google Scholar
Cotton, C. A., 1957. Tectonic features in a coastal setting at Wellington, Trans. R. Soc. N.Z., lxxxiv, 761–90.Google Scholar
Cotton, C. A., (in press). Dissection and redissection of the Wellington landscape, Trans. R. Soc. N.Z., lxxxv (3).Google Scholar
Cotton, C. A., and Te Punga, M. T., 1955 a. Solifluxion and periglacially modified landforms at Wellington, New Zealand, Trans. R. Soc. N.Z., lxxxii, 1001–31.Google Scholar
Cotton, C. A., and Te Punga, M. T. 1955 b. Fossil gullies in the Wellington landscape, N.Z. Geographer, xi, 72–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, W. M., 1912. Die erklärende Beschreibung der Landformen, Leipzig. Teubner.Google Scholar
Mortensen, H., 1947. Alternierende Abtragung, Nachr. Ak. Wiss. Göttingen, M-P. K1., pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. R., 1957. Solifluxion phenomena in the Lower Hutt area, N.Z. J. Sci. Tech., B xxxviii, 279–96.Google Scholar
Suchel, A., 1954. Studien zur quartären Morphologie des Hilsgebietes, Göttinger Geogr. Abh., Heft 17, 1–148.Google Scholar
Te Punga, M. T., 1957. Periglaciation in southern England, Tijds. K. Ned. Aardrijksk. Gen. Amsterdam, lxxiv, 401–12.Google Scholar
Tricart, J., 1951 a. Le système d'érosion périglaciaire, Information Geographique, v, 1–7.Google Scholar
Tricart, J., 1951 b. Die Entstehungsbedingungen des Schichtstufenreliefs im Pariser Becken, Peterm. Geogr. Mitt., ii, 98–104.Google Scholar
Tricart, J., 1956 a. Types de fleuves et systémes morphogénétiques en Afrique occidentale, Bull. Sec. Geogr. Com. Trav. hist. scient. 1955, 303–412.Google Scholar
Tricart, J., 1956 b. In Cotton, C. A., et Tricart, J.. Discussions à propos de l'analyse d'un ouvrage. Rev. Geom. dyn., vii, 148–9.Google Scholar
Tricart, J., et Cailleux, A., 1952. Conditions anciennes et actuelles de la genèse des pén´eplaines, Proc. Int. Geogr. Cong. Washington, 396–9.Google Scholar
Tricart, J., 1955. Introduction à la géomorphologie climatique, Cours de Géomorphologie, Paris: C.D.U., 1–228.Google Scholar