Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:32:40.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Algal Limestones and Associated Sediments in the Basal Purbeck of Dorset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Philip R. Brown
Philip R. Brown
Affiliation:
Exploration Research Division, Continental Oil Company, Ponca City, Oklahoma, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The basal Purbeck of Dorset includes interesting “dirt-beds” or fossil soils. The limestones, previously considered freshwater, are here shown to be largely of marine algal origin containing species of Ortonella, Girvanella, and Solenopora and presumed algal stromatolites. Petrographic evidence of anhydrite, gypsum, and celestine suggests evaporitic conditions during their formation. This is supported by the presence of ostracods belonging to marine or super-saline species, and by the scarcity of other fauna.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 100 , Issue 6 , December 1963 , pp. 565 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, F. W., 1948. Algal beds in the Great Estuarine Series of Skye. Proc. roy. phys. Soc. Edinb., 23, 123–142.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. W., 1958. in; Bridport and Yeovil. Mem. geol. Serv. U.K.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J., 1933. The Jurassic System in Great Britain. Oxford.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J., 1947. Geology of the country around Weymouth, Swanage, Corfe, and Lulworth. Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Bathurst, R. G. C., 1958. Diagenetic fabrics in some British Dinantian limestones. Lpool. Manch. geol. J., 2, 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carozzi, A., 1961. Distorted oolites and pseudoolites. J. sediment, Petol., 31, 262–274.Google Scholar
Cloud, P. E., 1942. Notes on Stromatolites. Amer. J. Sci., 240, 363–379.Google Scholar
Falcon, N. L., and Kent, P. E., 1960. Geological results of Petroleum Exploration in Britain, 1945–1957. Geol. Soc. Lond., Memoir 2.Google Scholar
Folk, R. L., 1959. Practical petrographic classification of limestones. Bull. Amer. Ass. Petol. Geol., 34, 1–38.Google Scholar
George, T. N., 1960. Lower Carboniferous rocks in County Wexford. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 116, 349–364.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, R. N., 1960. Ancient analogues of Recent Stromatolites. 21st Int. Geol. Cong. Copenhagen, Sec. 22, 26–35.Google Scholar
Pia, J., 1927. Die Erhaltung der fossilen Pflanzen. in., Hirmer, M. Handb. der Paläobotanick. Munchen under Berlin.Google Scholar
Sando, J. S., 1957. Beeckmantown Group (Lower Ordovician) of Maryland. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 68.Google Scholar
West, I. M., 1960. On the occurrence of Celestine in the Caps and Broken Beds at Durlston Head, Dorset. Proc. Geol. Ass. Lond., 71, 391–401.Google Scholar
West, I. M., 1961. Lower Purbeck Beds of Swindon Facies in Dorset. Nature, 190, 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar