Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:46:35.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding the population genetic structure of coastal species (Cakile maritima): seed dispersal and the role of sea currents in determining population structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2008

MHEMMED GANDOUR*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Adaptation des Plantes aux Stress Abiotiques, Centre de Biotechnologie, Technopole de Borj-Cédria, B.P. 901, 2050 Hammam-Lif, Tunisia
KAMEL HESSINI
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Adaptation des Plantes aux Stress Abiotiques, Centre de Biotechnologie, Technopole de Borj-Cédria, B.P. 901, 2050 Hammam-Lif, Tunisia
CHEDLY ABDELLY
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Adaptation des Plantes aux Stress Abiotiques, Centre de Biotechnologie, Technopole de Borj-Cédria, B.P. 901, 2050 Hammam-Lif, Tunisia
*
*Corresponding author. Tel: +216 79 412 848. Fax: 00 216 71 430 934. e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The nature and extent of long-distance seed dispersal are currently poorly understood, largely due to the inherent difficulty in detecting such a phenomenon. Genetic methods provide one of the few general approaches that offer the potential to accurately address this issue. Phenotypic and allozymic approaches were applied to characterize inter-population seed dispersal of the sea rocket (Cakile maritima, Brassicaceae), a glabrous and succulent annual herb. Genetic variation was assessed on 360 individuals sampled from nine populations. Genetic diversity across populations was high, 37% of which was represented by Qst and 16% by Fst. When genetic distances were used to construct the UPGMA dendrogram, populations were clustered into three groups at the 90% similarity level. The pattern of clustering can be explained by examining the direction of sea currents around Tunisian coasts. We have shown in this study that C. maritima seeds can survive up to 4 months immersion in sea water and up to 1 year of floating in sea water; therefore, seed dispersal between populations is possible both in terms of seed survival and current patterns.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

1. Introduction

The historical abiotic factor (quaternary climatic change), the factor related to the specific biology of species and the modern abiotic factor (seed dispersal by sea currents) were identified to determine the phylogeographic structure (Clausing et al., Reference Clausing, Vickers and Kadereit2000; Kadereit & Westberg, Reference Kadereit and Westberg2007). Particularly, seed dispersal has a profound effect on the distribution and genetic structure of populations and species (Ouborg et al., Reference Ouborg, Piquot and Van Groenendael1999; Cain et al., Reference Cain, Milligan and Strand2000; Wang & Smith, Reference Wang and Smith2002; Bond et al., Reference Bond, Daniels and Bioret2005), but it is hard to measure (Cain et al., Reference Cain, Milligan and Strand2000). Indeed, the difficulties in understanding, measuring and analysing seed dispersal in coastal plant natural communities have been considered as an unavoidable limitation (Wheelwright & Orians, Reference Wheelwright and Orians1982). Consequently, empirical data are almost exclusively limited to short-distance dispersal (Ouborg et al., Reference Ouborg, Piquot and Van Groenendael1999; Cain et al., Reference Cain, Milligan and Strand2000). However, an understanding of long-distance dispersal is important since it influences many key aspects of plant biology (Hanski & Gilpin, Reference Hanski and Gilpin1997; Cheplick, Reference Cheplick and Cheplick1998; Clark et al., Reference Clark, Fastie and Hurtt1998; Hanski, Reference Hanski1998; Hovestadt et al., Reference Hovestadt, Yao and Linsenmair1999; Ouborg et al. Reference Ouborg, Piquot and Van Groenendael1999; Sork et al., Reference Sork, Nason, Campbell and Fernández1999; Cain et al., Reference Cain, Milligan and Strand2000; Nathan & Muller-Landau, Reference Nathan and Muller-Landau2000; Nathan et al., Reference Nathan, Safriel, Noy-Meir and Schiller2000; Ingvarsson, Reference Ingvarsson2001; Wang & Smith, Reference Wang and Smith2002).

Genetic markers, which track seed movement (Dow & Ashley, Reference Dow and Ashley1996; Petit et al., Reference Petit, Mousadik and Pons1996; Schnabel et al., Reference Schnabel, Nason and Hamrick1998), are useful to detect empirical evidence of long-distance dispersal events (Cain et al., Reference Cain, Milligan and Strand2000). They provide a broadly applicable way to best quantify such a phenomenon (Ouborg et al., Reference Ouborg, Piquot and Van Groenendael1999; Cain et al., Reference Cain, Milligan and Strand2000). As a result, studies on dispersal (especially long-distance dispersal) using genetic markers have risen rapidly over the last 15 years (Nathan, Reference Nathan2003; Nathan et al., Reference Nathan, Perry, Cronin, Strand and Cain2003; He et al., Reference He, Krauss, Lamont, Miller and Enright2004; Bond et al., Reference Bond, Daniels and Bioret2005). To date, almost all the empirical studies using population allocation methods have used microsatellite DNA loci as the marker of choice (Paetkau et al., Reference Paetkau, Calvert, Stirling and Strobeck1995; Nielsen et al., Reference Nielsen, Hansen and Loeschcke1997). However, the allozyme and phenotypic markers are efficient not only for offering the benefits of minimal development time and cost but also for giving appropriate information.

In this paper, we assess gene diversity, genetic structuring, population differentiation and the association between geographical and genetic distance using phenotypic and/or biochemical markers. Factors responsible for the structuring are also discussed.

2. Studied species

Cakile maritima, the sea rocket (Brassicaceae), is a glabrous and succulent annual herb. It has a short life cycle (3 months from seed to seed) and produces a large number of seeds with high germinative capacity even in the presence of salt. Its annual character is not strict, since some individuals may survive over two or three years. In such instances, the number of seeds produced may be almost 18-fold that produced by a single reproductive cycle (Thorne, Reference Thorne1967; Barbour & Rodman, Reference Barbour and Rodman1970; Boyd, Reference Boyd1988; Boyd & Barbour, Reference Boyd and Barbour1993). C. maritima is commonly found in ephemeral strandline communities on sandy shores in many parts of the world (Doing, Reference Doing1985) and always close to the sea level, at or above the highest equinoctial spring tides. It tolerates climates ranging from Arctic to Mediterranean, reflecting its latitudinal distribution. Periodic appearance and loss of large strands of C. maritima may suggest that the tidal transport is the major factor in the population mobility. Dispersal, which depends on local dune and beach topography, can be realized by water (tides and sea currents) or more locally by wind. Once established, C. maritima may play a role in trapping blown sand, thus initiating fore dune formation and dune succession, especially on prograding coasts. The easily detached upper fruit segments are more suited to dispersal over long distances; however, the lower fruit segments that are retained by the maternal plants are more likely to disperse their seeds locally and exploit a proven habitat. Dune succession and predation by animals may also restrict the ability of C. maritima to persist on the same site in successive years. Fruit segments can remain buoyant in sea water for long periods thanks to spongy tissues in their corky pericarps (Guppy, Reference Guppy1917). C. maritima is tolerant to salt spray and transient seawater inundation; in particular, the vegetative growth of plants from Tunisian populations was stimulated by NaCl concentrations in the range 50–100 mM and plants were able to grow at up to 500 mM NaCl (Dabez et al., Reference Dabez, Ben Hamed, Grignon and Abdelly2004).

3. Materials and methods

(i) Seed collections and germination protocol

In summer 2004, we collected fruits from plants of nine populations along Tunisian coasts (Table 1). The size of these populations varies from almost 60 individuals to much more than 500 individual plants. Ten seeds per family were sown in a Petri dish on moistened filter paper. Germination was carried out under laboratory conditions (in the dark at 20–25°C). Four days later, four randomly chosen seedlings per family were planted in separate pots and randomized in an unheated greenhouse. Ten families per population (i.e. 40 seedlings per population) were cultivated under uniform environmental conditions and used for quantitative genetic study. Out of each group of 40 seedlings, 30 were used for allozyme analysis.

Table 1. Cakile maritima Tunisian populations. Their climate region and their alphanumeric code

(ii) Seed buoyancy and viability

The trait buoyancy (floating capacity) indicates the potential of species to be dispersed by water. It is given as the proportion of seeds floating after a defined time period. For this purpose, 100 seeds of C. maritima were placed in a closed bottle containing 500 ml of sea water in October 2005. The number of seeds that sank was recorded over time. In February 2006, ten of the floating seeds were sown on filtered sand and irrigated with tap water to test their viability.

(iii) Morphological measurements

Two sets of morphological traits were considered discriminator traits between populations: vegetative traits (leaf morphotype (leaf form (LFF)) and leaf length (LFL)) and reproductive traits (flower date emergence (FED), petal length (PTLT), petal width (PTW), petal colour (PTC), pistil length (PSL), fruit type (FRT), fruit sizes (length of the upper segment (LUP) and length of the lower segment (LLW) and seed number (SN)). Leaf characteristics were graded from 1 to 10, with 1 being leaves with entire margins, 10 being leaves with the most deeply pinnatified margins, and intermediates classified by graduations between these extremes (Fig. 1). Leaves selected for morphotype determination were also used for length measurements. Fruit size was measured separately for the upper and lower segments and was classified into three discriminate modals: unhorned, intermediate and horned quantified as a series of 0, 1 and 2, respectively (Fig. 2). Leaf length, petal length and width, pistil length and fruit size were measured by an electronic calliper. Colour and size measurements were performed on one petal chosen haphazardly from each individual.

Fig. 1. Leaf morphotypes in Cakile arranged as a standard sequence, 1–10, for field assessment of leaf variation.

Fig. 2. Siliculas modal of Cakile (0: unhorned fruit; 1: intermediate fruit; 2: horned fruit).

(iv) Data analysis

A nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) including population and family (nested within population) as random effects was conducted for each quantitative trait. The level of population differentiation in the quantitative traits was measured with Qst (Spitze, Reference Spitze1993), which is analogous to Fst measured using allozyme marker loci. In order to estimate Qst, δb2 is obtained directly from the population variance δp2, that is, (δb2p2), whereas the family variance δf2 has to be converted into δw2 by multiplication with a coefficient (c) that depends on the relationship of individuals within families (δw2=cδf2). For half-sibs, full-sibs and cloned individuals, c is 4, 2 and 1 (under the assumption of no dominance and epistasis), respectively. When populations are in Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium (Fis≠0), the level of differentiation in quantitative traits could be expressed as: (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Yeh and Yanchukt1996) where Qst has the expression (Spitze, Reference Spitze1993) and others (Lande, Reference Lande1992; Latta, Reference Latta2004).

V W is estimated to be four times the between-family component of variance V fam under the assumption that maternal effects were weak and that within open-pollinated families were related as half-sibs (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Yeh and Yanchukt1996), while V B is simply the among-population variance component. Approximate standard error (SE) values of Qst were obtained by the ‘delta’ technique (Stuart & Ord, Reference Stuart and Ord1987). This method, used by Podolsky & Holtsford (Reference Podolsky and Holtsford1995), provides reliable SE estimates of genetic variance components for setting confidence limits (CLs) to genetic parameters (Hohls, Reference Hohls1996).

(v) Allozyme experiment

For the allozyme analysis, an electrophoresis survey was used to estimate genetic variability within and among C. maritima populations. Approximately 200 mg leaf tissue were collected from each plant (1 month old), ground under liquid nitrogen and mixed with 100 μl of extraction buffer (PVP–potassium phosphate grinding buffer, pH 7), as described by Thrall et al. (Reference Thrall, Andrew and Burdon2000), and were centrifuged at 19 000 g for 20 min. Ground material was absorbed on Whatman 3MM filter paper wicks and stored in an ultra-cold freezer (−70°C) until analysis. Horizontal starch-gel electrophoresis was performed for seven enzyme systems revealing a minimum of 13 loci: peroxidase (Px; EC 1.11.1.7), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH; EC 1.1.1.42), glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT; EC 2.6.1.1), shikimate dehydrogenase (SDH; EC 1.1.1.25), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP; EC 3.4.11.1), 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6-PGD; EC 1.1.1.44) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH; EC 1.1.1.37). The compositions of gel and electrode buffers were described in Soltis et al. (Reference Soltis, Haufler, Darrow and Gastony1983) and the methods used to stain allozyme bands were described in Michaud et al. (Reference Michaud, Lumaret and Romane1992) for Px and in Cardy et al. (Reference Cardy, Stuber and Goodman1980) for IDH, GOT, LAP, SDH, 6-PGD and MDH. For phosphatase acid (ACPH; EC 3.1.3.2), vertical zoned polyacrylamide gels were prepared following Laemmli (Reference Laemmli1970) and were stained according to Selander et al. (Reference Selander, Smith, Yang, Johnson and Gentry1971). Loci were numbered sequentially with the most anodally migrating locus designated as locus 1. Genetic interpretation for all loci was straightforward.

(vi) Data analysis

At each of the 13 loci studied in C. maritima, genotypic and allelic frequencies were assessed from a survey of gel phenograms. Three coefficients, measuring genetic variation, were computed using BIOSYS-1: (i) the percentage of polymorphic loci (P) using 0·95 criterion (a locus is considered polymorphic if the most common allele has a frequency of less than 95% in all the populations analysed); (ii) the mean number of alleles per locus (A); and (iii) the expected heterozygosity (He) under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (Nei, Reference Nei1978). These three coefficients were estimated for each of the sampled populations. The mean and standard deviation of the previously mentioned coefficients were then calculated over all populations sampled. The genetic structure within and among populations was also evaluated using Wright's (Reference Wright1965) F-statistics Fit, Fis and Fst. Heterozygote frequency for each polymorphic locus in each population was tested for significant deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg expectations with a χ2 analysis (Li & Horvitz, Reference Li and Horvitz1953) (BIOSYS-1). Estimate of Nm (the number of migrants per generation) was based on Fst (Wright, Reference Wright1951) (Genetix 4.02). To test if populations' genetic differences followed the model of isolation by distance, we established the relationship between the genetic difference Fst values between pairs of populations and their geographical distance using the Mantel test (Genetix 4.02). In order to examine the genetic distance and the geographic distance, the UPGMA clustering analyses were conducted (BIOSYS-1).

(vii) Matrix correlation

The association between morphological, genetic, sea current speed and geographical distance matrices was examined with the Mantel test (1967). The Mantel test uses random permutations of matrix rows and columns to test if correlations between distance matrices are greater than expected by chance (Sokal & Rohlf, Reference Sokal and Rohlf1995). We compared genetic and morphological distance matrices to each other with geographical matrices individually and then we compared Nm estimated from Fst and Qst to sea current speed. Pairwise population of sea current speed was measured by using ship-drift. Ship-drift measurement of surface current velocity consists of the vector difference between the velocity of a ship determined from two position fixes and the average estimated velocity of the ship through the water during the same time interval, usually 12–24 h. The vector difference is considered to be due to a surface current. The absence of connectedness was marked as 0.

(viii) Assignment tests

To test whether the marine currents, as described in Fig. 5, drive the direction of gene flow, it will be interesting to use the Assignment tests. These methods are strong tools to detect recent immigration events even when the overall population differentiation is low (Rannala & Mountain, Reference Rannala and Mountain1997; Waser & Strobeck, Reference Waser and Strobeck1998; Castric & Bernatchez, Reference Castric and Bernatchez2004). In fact, assignment tests are particularly useful to trace the contemporary dynamics of natural populations without requiring equilibrium assumptions based on long-term genetic processes (Manel et al., Reference Manel, Gaggiotti and Waples2005). As the pattern of misclassification of individuals within a population can be used to determine the direction of migration, assignment tests might be a useful method to examine the influence of sea currents on gene flow. The probability that an individual sampled within a given population is a migrant originating from another population was determined by using a Bayesian method (Geneclass2 software) (Piry et al., Reference Piry, Alapetite, Cornuet, Paetkau, Baudouin and Estoup2004).

4. Results

(i) Quantitative genetic variation

Phenotypic values were compared by region using a nested ANOVA. ANOVA showed a significant variation among populations in all the traits except LFL (Table 2). Significant differences among families within populations were also found for all the traits. Accordingly, with the exception of the population variance component for leaf length, variance components among populations and among families were significant as the respective lower CLs by bootstrapping were greater than zero. Values of Qst varied considerably from 39·6% for LFL to 72·2% for LFF with an average value of 0·55 among all populations (Table 2). Pairwise Qst estimates between populations show that comparisons involving population in different regions often had large (and significant) Qst values (Table 5). They ranged from 0·53 (between populations Bekalta and Chaffar; geographical distance=196) to 0·858 (between Bekalta and Enfidha; distance=89 km). Despite the relatively high degree of differentiation, matrix randomization tests revealed a statistically non-significant correlation of Qst with both Fst and geographical distance separating pairs of populations (r=0·03; the Mantel test, P=0·412) and (r=−0·07; the Mantel test, P=0·638).

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of characters measured in nine populations of Cakile maritima (the means, between-population variance (VB), within population variance (VW), F-statistics for characters that gave a significant result using ANOVA and the level of population differentiation in quantitative characters as determined by Qst and its 95% lower confidence limit (CL)). Standard errors (SE) of Qst are given in parentheses

CL=Qst−(1645×SE).

A matrix of genetic distance values using the Euclidian distances method was built to generate a dendrogram showing quantitative trait relationships between Tunisian populations of C. maritima. In this dendrogram, two main groups were identified (Fig. 3). The first group was represented with a single population (Tabarka) and the second one enclosed all the remaining populations structured as two subgroups, namely Jerba–Hammamet–Raoued–Bizerte and Sousse–Chaffar–Bekalta.

Fig. 3. Phenogram showing the relationships of sampled populations of Cakile maritima based on genetic distances among populations calculated from quantitative traits.

(ii) Patterns of allozyme differentiation

A total of 46 alleles were found at the 13 polymorphic loci, with an average of 3·54 alleles per polymorphic loci. Allelic frequencies per locus, observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) are shown in Table 3. The level of Ho ranged from 0·152±0·076 for the Sousse population to 0·311±0·089 for the Tabarka population. This population also exhibited the highest mean number of alleles (A=2·4±0·3). Most of the alleles were well spread out over the population, and a few of them were found only in one, two or a few populations. Tabarka was the population with the greatest number of unique genotypes (two). All other populations had only one or no unique genotype. Percentage of polymorphic stains ranged from a low of 53·8 in the Sousse and Raoued populations to a high of 84·6 in the Tabarka, Bekalta, Bizerte and Jerba populations. The mean Ho for the species is 0·2 and a significant excess of heterozygotes was detected in IDH2, LAP and ACPH1 (Table 4).

Table 3. Mean number of alleles per locus, observed heterozygosity, expected heterozygosity, percentage of polymorphic loci and Fis (correlations between uniting gametes within subpopulations). Values are given as the means for 13 enzyme loci

a A locus is considered polymorphic if more than one allele was detected.

b Unbiased estimate (see Nei, Reference Nei1978).

Table 4. Summary of F-statistics at all loci: Fis (correlations between uniting gametes within subpopulations or inbreeding in individuals relative to subpopulations to which they belong), Fit (correlations between uniting gametes for the total population or inbreeding in subpopulations relative to the total population) and Fst (the average population differentiation in allozyme marker loci)

Genetic variation based on allozyme marker genes was estimated by the average (across loci) of He under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. He-values ranged from 0·193±0·061 for the Sousse population to 0·385±0·067 for the Tabarka population (Table 3) and indicated that C. maritima exhibits within population levels of genetic diversity concordant with predominantly outcrossed species (Hamrick & Godt, Reference Hamrick, Godt, Brown, Clegg, Kahler and Weir1989).

Overall, our data indicate a deficiency of heterozygotes both for within populations and for the total sample relative to the Hardy–Weinberg expectations (Table 4). For the complete set of nine populations, the mean and range of Fis (correlations between uniting gametes within subpopulations or inbreeding in individuals relative to subpopulations to which they belong), Fit (correlations between uniting gametes for the total population or inbreeding in subpopulations relative to the total population) and Fst values over the loci were 0·3, 0·41 and 0·155, respectively (Table 4). A gene flow rate estimated from Fst values was 1·63 migrants among the complete set of nine populations.

Pairwise Fst values were computed for all possible pairs of populations ranging from 0·05 to 0·285. The overall average was 0·155. The pair of populations of Enfidha–Tabarka displayed the highest genetic divergence (Fst=0·285), followed by Sousse–Enfidha (Fst=0·282). The lowest degree of differentiation was observed between the populations of Hammamet and Raoued (Fst=0·057), followed by the pair of populations Bizerte and Raoued (Fst=0·072). Based on the Mantel test, no correlation was found between pairwise Fst and geographic distances measured as a straight line, indicating that the genetic distance did not necessarily correlate with the geographical distance since the genetic distance among geographically distant populations was large and those among close populations were small (r=0·07; P=0·26). But Fst was significantly correlated with pairwise sea current speed measured by the use of ship–drift, indicating that sea current can be one of the major factors affecting population structure in this species (r=0·23; P=0·042).

The overall pattern of between-population allozyme differentiation is summarized in the cluster diagram (Fig. 4). The major division of the populations into two clusters contains little geographic structure. At the three-cluster level, the top cluster in the diagram contains only the Tabarka population. The second cluster contains a mixture of populations from north and central populations (Bizerte, Raoued, Hammamet, Sousse and Bekalta). The third cluster contains mainly southern (Jerba and Chaffar) and central populations (Enfidha). Pairwise Fst values agreed with the phylogeny in indicating that the Tabarka population was genetically isolated from the remaining populations (Table 5). Large and significant values in pairwise Fst statistics indicated that haplotype distribution was not random with respect to geographic location (Table 5). Most of this variation, however, was due to differences between major sea currents in the region.

Fig. 4. Phenogram showing the relationships of sampled populations of Cakile maritima based on Nei's (Reference Nei1978) genetic distances among populations calculated from allele frequencies.

Table 5. Matrices of (a) straight-line separation distances (km), (b) Qst, (c) Fst for each pairwise combination of populations and (d and e) Nm estimated from Fst and Qst respectively

(iii) Comparison of Qst with Fst

The average population differentiation in allozyme marker loci (Fst) across 13 loci was 0·155, which was significantly larger than zero at P=0·01. Estimates of population differentiation in quantitative traits (Qst) varied widely among the 11 quantitative traits (Table 2). If allozymes can be considered effectively neutral, the estimate of proportion of diversity among populations for the electrophoretic data (0·155) can be used as the null hypothesis for testing among population variance in quantitative traits. Qst values of each trait were compared with the corresponding Fst values. Qst was generally greater than Fst for all studied variables. Across the entire transect, the average pairwise estimate of Qst was 3·5-fold larger than that of Fst (0·558 vs. 0·155). For average quantitative trait sizes (mean Qst values across 11 instar-specific measures), the Qst value of 0·558 is significantly greater than 0·155 (P=0·005). No significant correlation was detected between the observed patterns of molecular variation and morphological variation. There may be several reasons for the discrepancy between results based on morphology and allozymes. First, allozymes are considered to be neutral and thus to provide no direct assessment of fitness. The forces that cause differentiation for these markers would be the result of mutation, genetic drift and no selection. Conversely, morphological traits are generally believed to be subject to natural selection, and their expression is partially under the influence of environmental factors. Second, in contrast with morphological traits, allozymes variation is directly based on DNA sequence variation. A change in allozymes can result from a change in nucleotide sequence. Despite these basic differences, low gene flow would allow accumulation of small or higher adaptive differences, explaining some concordance between morphological and molecular traits.

A significant correlation was detected between the pairwise population sea current speed and the observed patterns of molecular variation and morphological variation.

(iv) Gene flow

Average Nm was estimated to be 1·65 individuals using Fst index and 0·125 individuals using Qst index. Estimates for pairwise Nm values (Table 5) were lowest for Enfidha–Tabarka (Nm=0·62; distance=527 km; sea current speed=0 knots) and highest for Hammamet–Raoued (Nm=4·09; distance=244 km; sea current speed=0·5 knots). Intermediate Nm values were obtained for a number of populations separated by shorter distances and low current speed, for example, Jerba–Enfidha or Sousse–Raoued.

(v) Assignments tests

The number of individuals assigned to a population that differed from the ones they were sampled in varied considerably between populations (mean=46·33%, min=10·6%, max=79% for Tabarka and Raoued, respectively) but the Chaffar, Bekalta and Sousse populations featured similar proportions of within-population misclassified individuals. Indeed, for these three populations, more than 75% of individuals were well assigned to the site they were sampled from.

(vi) Seed buoyancy and viability

C. maritima is a coastal species that benefits from sea water in its dispersal; in order to ensure the hypothesis of seed dispersal ability for this species, it will be interesting to prove its ability to float for a long time while maintaining viability. Results show that after 1 year of immersion in sea water, seven of the 90 seeds left after the germination experiment had sunk and the remaining 83 were still afloat. Of the ten seeds tested for viability, eight germinated within 10 days.

5. Discussion

The advantage of the approach based on Qst vs. Fst comparison is that results can be interpreted within the framework of the neutral theory of phenotypic evolution (Lande, Reference Lande1976, Reference Lande1977, Reference Lande1992; Chakraborty & Nei, Reference Chakraborty and Nei1982; Rogers & Harpending, Reference Rogers and Harpending1983; Lynch & Hill, Reference Lynch and Hill1986; Lynch, Reference Lynch1988, Reference Lynch and Real1994; Whitlock, Reference Whitlock1999). This approach provides a means of testing long-standing hypotheses about the ecological causes of population differentiation (modern abiotic factor) and the role of selection in maintaining clinal variation. This study showed that C. maritima populations have significant levels of phenotypic and allozymic differentiation as indicated by their morphological traits and enzymatic systems. The second main finding is that there is a general deficiency of heterozygote individuals and high levels of genetic divergence between samples from the same population. This was indicated by the fact that Fis is positive (0·3) and significantly different from zero in the majority of the studied loci. More than 15% of the total genetic variation is among populations (Fst=0·155), which indicates high differentiation. This is also reflected in Qst values (another estimate of differentiation degree) of 0·558. Several deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were found in all the populations analysed. Given that C. maritima is an outbreeder, observed deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium cannot be explained by inbreeding effect, but it can be explained by assuming that such long-distance dispersal events have occurred and have led to diversification. A study of another species whose seeds are dispersed by water, Hibiscus moscheatus, showed that over short distances the relationship between populations and their level of differentiation was based not on geographical distances between populations but on their accessibility to the main stream of water (Kudoh & Whigham, Reference Kudoh and Whigham1997). Indeed, dispersal mode is an important factor that affects the ability of a plant species to colonize a new area, especially those at long distances from the seed source. The presumed modes of seed dispersal in the genus Cakile are over short distances by fruits being blown along the beach, and over longer distances via tidal currents (Clausing et al., Reference Clausing, Vickers and Kadereit2000). In addition, C. maritima is an allogamous often insect-pollinated species; therefore, most pollen should be transferred between plants in the same or adjacent population. Long-distance pollen transfer, because of extended foraging or by insects being blown along the coast, is rare. However, if gene flow in C. maritima was only through pollen transfer we would expect to find isolation by distance. In our case, we show that pairs of populations that are geographically close generate a high genetic distance in comparison with others that are more distinct geographically. Analyses of tidal maps (Fig. 5) show that there are three major currents in the coast of Tunisia, one flowing northwards into Algeria, the second flowing into the Gulf of Hammamet and the third flowing into south of Tunisia. These current patterns make it virtually impossible for seeds to be exchanged between Tabarka and the remaining populations (Fig. 5), thus backing up our results, which showed that the greatest genetic differentiation occurred between the Tabarka population and all others. Thus, the hypothesis of a random distribution of lineage between those habitats was rejected. The tidal patterns may also explain the low levels of genetic diversity between populations around the Cap Bon region. Estimates of Nm between populations and its high correlation with sea current speed supported this assumption. In addition, results of assignment tests revealed that a population preferentially exchanged migrants with other populations located within the area of the Cap Bon region. We also found a lower proportion of misclassified individuals within the Sahel region (a region characterized by lower sea current). Dispersal by sea currents can lead to exchange of genes between related populations. Thus, the dispersal pattern of seeds contributes to the genetic structure of populations. However, seeds that travel long distances are inherently difficult to observe. We have shown in this paper that genetic methods can be used to provide data on the tail of the dispersal curve (Waser & Strobeck, Reference Waser and Strobeck1998; Bohonak, Reference Bohonak1999; Ouborg et al., Reference Ouborg, Piquot and Van Groenendael1999). Molecular markers characteristically reveal more complex and diffuse patterns of geographic variation and show a lower variation between-population component of genetic diversity than maternally inherited, seed-dispersed, markers (Ennos, Reference Ennos, Silvirtown and Antonovics2001).

Fig. 5. Cakile maritima Tunisian populations, their climate region and the direction of sea currents.

Our data fit the general patterns of current flow in the region and suggest that there is gene flow between C. maritima Tunisian populations. However, it is crucial to ensure the ability of this species to float for a long time while maintaining viability. Results showed that there are 92% buoyancy after 1 year (October 2005 to October 2006) and 80% seed germination after 4 months of immersion in sea water. These values for seed buoyancy and viability are relatively similar to those obtained in Calystegia soldanella (Arafeh & Kadereit, Reference Arafeh and Kadereit2006) and are much higher than those reported for the other coastal species investigated by Kadereit et al. (Reference Kadereit, Arafeh, Somogyi and Westberg2005). The result suggests that the floating ability of seeds is important for the creation of plant distribution patterns. Similarly, Schneider & Sharitz (Reference Schneider and Sharitz1988) and Boedeltje et al. (Reference Boedeltje, Bakker, Bekker, Van Groenendael and Soesbergen2003) demonstrated the significance of buoyancy for effective hydrochorous dispersal. Nilsson et al. (Reference Nilsson, Ekblad, Dynesius, Backe, Gardfjell, Carlberg, Hellqvist and Jansson1994) proposed that water dispersal of seeds is effective in the Vindel River, and that inability to float for a long time does not disqualify species from being dispersed by water over considerable distances. In C. maritima, we suggest that long time buoyancy was a crucial factor for seed dispersion since the movement of seed along 100 km takes 1 year.

One of the limitations of this study is that the genetic variance within populations V G was estimated as four times the variance component among families. Since seeds were taken from natural habitats of C. maritima, we assumed that there are no factors affecting the mating system in this species; consequently, seeds from a single individual were considered as half-sibs. If the open-pollinated progeny from a single mother were all full-sibs, V G should be estimated to be twice the variance among families. This decrease in V G would effect an increase in our Qst estimates.

6. Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that C. maritima is characterized by a relatively high within-population genetic diversity. Indeed, the estimates of genetic differentiation and gene flow suggest that the species is primarily outcrossing. In addition, we have shown that C. maritima seeds can survive up to 4 months immersion in sea water and up to 1 year of floating in sea water and the genetic distances were more correlated with sea current speed than with geographic distances. Therefore seed dispersal between populations is possible both in terms of seed survival and current patterns. Consequently, tides are probably the main cause of long-distance gene flow via seeds. In this context, some populations are most likely to be a source of gene (probably northern populations). Long-distance dispersal of floating seeds and micro-scale eco-geographic factors may play important roles in the genetic diversity of the populations and the genetic structure of this species.

We wish to thank the group at the Sea Observatory in Tunisia (National Institute of Sciences and Sea Technology) for providing quantitative data on sea current speed. We are grateful to the Editor and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

Arafeh, R. & Kadereit, J. W. (2006). Long-distance seed dispersal, clone longevity and lack of phylogeographical structure in the European distributional range of the coastal Calystegia soldanella (L.) R. Br. (Convolvulaceae). Journal of Biogeography 33, 14611469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, M. G. & Rodman, J. E. (1970). Saga of the west coast sea rockets: Cakile edentula ssp. californica and C. maritima. Rhodora 72, 370386.Google Scholar
Boedeltje, G., Bakker, J. P., Bekker, R. M., Van Groenendael, J. M. & Soesbergen, M. (2003). Plant dispersal in a lowland stream in relation to occurrence and three specific life-history traits of the species in the species pool. Journal of Ecology 91, 855866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohonak, A. J. (1999). Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Quarterly Review of Biology 74, 2145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, J. M., Daniels, R. & Bioret, F. (2005). Genetic diversity in Crambe maritima along the English Channel: the role of ocean currents in determining population structure. Ecography 28, 374384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. S. (1988). Microdistribution of the beach plant Cakile maritima (Brassicaceae) as influenced by a rodent herbivore. American Journal of Botany 75, 15401548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. S. & Barbour, M. G. (1993). Replacement of Cakile edentula by C. maritima in the strand habitat of California. American Midland Naturalist 130, 209228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, M. L., Milligan, B. G. & Strand, A. E. (2000). Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. American Journal of Botany 87, 12171227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardy, B. J., Stuber, C. W. & Goodman, M. M. (1980). Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize (Zea mays L.). Department of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 1317, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Castric, V. & Bernatchez, L. (2004). Individual assignment test reveals differential restriction to dispersal between two salmonids despite no increase of genetic differences with distance. Molecular Ecology 13, 12991312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraborty, R. & Nei, M. (1982). Genetic differentiation of quantitative characters between populations or species. I. Mutation and random genetic drift. Genetical Research 39, 303314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheplick, G. P. (1998). Seed dispersal and seedling establishment in grass population. In Population Biology of Grass (ed. Cheplick, G. P.), pp. 84105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. S., Fastie, C. & Hurtt, G. (1998). Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration – dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records. Bioscience 48, 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausing, G., Vickers, K. & Kadereit, J. W. (2000). Historical biogeography in a linear system: genetic variation of Sea Rocket (Cakile maritima) and Sea Holly (Eryngium maritimum) along European coasts. Molecular Ecology 9, 18231833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabez, A., Ben Hamed, K., Grignon, C. & Abdelly, C. (2004). Salinity effects on germination, Growth, and seed production of the halophyte Cakile maritima. Plant and Soil 262, 179189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doing, H. (1985). Costal fore-dune zonation and succession in various parts of the world. Vegetatio 61, 6575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, B. D. & Ashley, M. V. (1996). Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology 5, 615627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennos, R. A. (2001). Inferences about spatial processes in plant population from the analysis of molecular marker. In Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context (ed. Silvirtown, J. & Antonovics, J.), pp. 4571. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guppy, H. B. (1917). Plants, Seed and Currents in the West Indies and Azores, pp. 185194. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. & Godt, M. J. W. (1989). Allozyme diversity in plant species. In Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources (ed. Brown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L. & Weir, B. S.), pp. 4363. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. (1998). Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396, 4149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E. (1997). Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biology Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, T. H., Krauss, S. L., Lamont, B. B., Miller, B. P. & Enright, N. J. (2004). Long-distance seed dispersal in a metapopulation of Banksia hookeriana inferred from a population allocation analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data. Molecular Ecology 13, 10991109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohls, T. (1996). Setting confidence limits to genetic parameters estimated by restricted likelihood analysis of North Carolina Design II experiments. Heredity 77, 476487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovestadt, T., Yao, P. & Linsenmair, K. E. (1999). Seed dispersal mechanisms and the vegetation of forest islands in a West African forest-savanna mosaic (Comoe National Park, Ivory Coast). Plant Ecology 144, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingvarsson, P. K. (2001). Restoration of genetic variation lost – the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 6263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadereit, J. W. & Westberg, E. (2007). Determinants of phylogeographic structure: a comparative study of seven coastal flowering plant species across their European range. Watsonia 26, 229238.Google Scholar
Kadereit, J. W., Arafeh, R., Somogyi, G. & Westberg, E. (2005). Terrestrial growth and marine dispersal? Comparative phylogeography of five coastal plant species at a European scale. Taxon 54, 861876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudoh, H. & Whigham, D. F. (1997). Microgeographic genetic structure and gene flow in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae) populations. American Journal of Botany 84, 12851293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1976). Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30, 314334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1977). Statistical test for natural selection on quantitative characters. Evolution 31, 442444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. (1992). Neutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and colonization. Evolution 46, 381389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latta, R. G. (2004). Gene flow and adaptive population divergence. New Phytologist 151, 6368.Google Scholar
Li, C. C. & Horvitz, D. J. (1953). Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. American Journal of Human Genetics 5, 107117.Google ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M. (1988). The divergence of neutral quantitative characters among partially isolated populations. Evolution 42, 455466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M. (1994). Neutral models of phenotypic evolution. In Ecological Genetics (ed. Real, L. A.), pp. 86108. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. & Hill, W. G. (1986). Phenotypic evolution by neutral mutation. Evolution 40, 915935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manel, S., Gaggiotti, O. E. & Waples, R. S. (2005). Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 136142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaud, H., Lumaret, R. & Romane, F. (1992). Variation in the genetic structure and reproductive biology of Holm oak populations. Vegetatio 99, 107113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R. (2003). Seeking the secrets of dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 275276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R. & Muller-Landau, H. C. (2000). Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 278285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathan, R., Safriel, U. N., Noy-Meir, I. & Schiller, G. (2000). Spatiotemporal variation in seed dispersal and recruitment near and far from Pinus halepensis trees. Ecology 81, 21562169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R., Perry, G., Cronin, J. T., Strand, A. E. & Cain, M. L. (2003). Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal. Oikos 103, 261273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. (1978). Estimation of average heterozygozity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89, 583590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E. E., Hansen, M. M. & Loeschcke, V. (1997). Analysis of microsatellite DNA from old scale samples of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar: a comparison of genetic composition over 60 years. Molecular Ecology 6, 487492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, C., Ekblad, A., Dynesius, M., Backe, S., Gardfjell, M., Carlberg, B., Hellqvist, S. & Jansson, R. (1994). A comparison of species richness and traits of riparian plants between a main river channel and its tributaries. Journal of Ecology 82, 281295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouborg, N. J., Piquot, Y. & Van Groenendael, J. M. (1999). Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. Journal of Ecology 87, 551568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paetkau, D., Calvert, W., Stirling, I. & Strobeck, C. (1995). Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4, 347354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petit, R. J., Mousadik, A. & Pons, O. (1996). Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology 12, 844855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piry, S., Alapetite, A., Cornuet, J.-M., Paetkau, D., Baudouin, L. & Estoup, A. (2004). Geneclass2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. Journal of Heredity 95, 536539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podolsky, R. H. & Holtsford, T. P. (1995). Population structure of morphological traits in Clarkia dudleyana. I. Comparison of Fst between allozymes and morphological traits. Genetics 140, 733744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rannala, B. & Mountain, J. L. (1997). Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94, 91979201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, A. R. & Harpending, H. C. (1983). Population structure and quantitative characters. Genetics 105, 9851002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnabel, A., Nason, J. D. & Hamrick, J. L. (1998). Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L.: seed dispersal and variation in female reproductive success. Molecular Ecology 7, 819832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, R. L. & Sharitz, R. R. (1988). Hydrochory and regeneration in a bald cypress–water tupelo swamp forest. Ecology 69, 10551063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S. Y., Johnson, W. E. & Gentry, J. B. (1971). Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation of the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI. University of Texas Publications 103, 4990.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Soltis, D. E., Haufler, C. H., Darrow, D. C. & Gastony, G. J. (1983). Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns. A compilation grinding, gel and electrode buffers and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73, 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sork, V. L., Nason, J., Campbell, D. R. & Fernández, J. F. (1999). Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitze, K. (1993). Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetics and allozymic variation. Genetics 135374.Google ScholarPubMed
Stuart, A. & Ord, J. K. (1987). Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 1, 5th edn.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, R. F. (1967). A flora of Santa Catalina Island, California. Aliso 6, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrall, P. H., Andrew, G. Y. & Burdon, J. J. (2000). An analysis of mating structure in populations of the annual sea rocket, Cakile maritima (Brassicaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 48, 731738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B. C. & Smith, T. B. (2002). Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 379386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, P. M. & Strobeck, C. (1998). Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 4344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheelwright, N. T. & Orians, G. H. (1982). Seed dispersal by animals: contrasts with pollen dispersal, problems of terminology, and constraints on coevolution. American Naturalist 119, 402413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, M. C. (1999). Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation. Genetical Research 74, 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1951). The genetic structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15, 323354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19, 395420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, R. C., Yeh, F. C. & Yanchukt, A. D. (1996). A comparison of isozyme and quantitative genetic variation in Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia by Fst. Genetics 142, 10451052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Cakile maritima Tunisian populations. Their climate region and their alphanumeric code

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Leaf morphotypes in Cakile arranged as a standard sequence, 1–10, for field assessment of leaf variation.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Siliculas modal of Cakile (0: unhorned fruit; 1: intermediate fruit; 2: horned fruit).

Figure 3

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of characters measured in nine populations of Cakile maritima (the means, between-population variance (VB), within population variance (VW), F-statistics for characters that gave a significant result using ANOVA and the level of population differentiation in quantitative characters as determined by Qst and its 95% lower confidence limit (CL)). Standard errors (SE) of Qst are given in parentheses

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Phenogram showing the relationships of sampled populations of Cakile maritima based on genetic distances among populations calculated from quantitative traits.

Figure 5

Table 3. Mean number of alleles per locus, observed heterozygosity, expected heterozygosity, percentage of polymorphic loci and Fis (correlations between uniting gametes within subpopulations). Values are given as the means for 13 enzyme loci

Figure 6

Table 4. Summary of F-statistics at all loci: Fis (correlations between uniting gametes within subpopulations or inbreeding in individuals relative to subpopulations to which they belong), Fit (correlations between uniting gametes for the total population or inbreeding in subpopulations relative to the total population) and Fst (the average population differentiation in allozyme marker loci)

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Phenogram showing the relationships of sampled populations of Cakile maritima based on Nei's (1978) genetic distances among populations calculated from allele frequencies.

Figure 8

Table 5. Matrices of (a) straight-line separation distances (km), (b) Qst, (c) Fst for each pairwise combination of populations and (d and e) Nm estimated from Fst and Qst respectively

Figure 9

Fig. 5. Cakile maritima Tunisian populations, their climate region and the direction of sea currents.