Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:59:13.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex ratio distortion in D. simulans after treatment with quinacrine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

S. C. Tsakas ,
K. Lamnisou ,
L. Tsacas  and
J. R. David
S. C. Tsakas*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Agricultural College of Athens, Votanicos, Athens, Greece 11855
K. Lamnisou
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Athens, Athens, Greece 15771
L. Tsacas
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie et Génétique Evolutives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 91190
J. R. David
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie et Génétique Evolutives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 91190
*
* Corresponding authors.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A significant excess of female offspring resulted when pregnant females of the D. simulans species were left to lay their eggs on food containing quinacrine. The same result occurred in a subsequent experiment in which male parents were injected with quinacrine. This was the first time that a chemical compound showing an affinity with DNA in vitro altered the sex ratio in a consistent manner. This effect had been predicted based on the unique quinacrine fluorescent staining pattern in D. simulans, in which only the Y stains intensely in mitotic chromosomes. It seems that treatment acts on spermatids or spermatozoa causing decreased functioning of the Y-bearing ones, resulting in an excess of female offspring. Interestingly, the species D. mauritiana and D. melanogaster, although very closely related to D. simulans, do not have its staining pattern and as predicted did not respond to treatment; therefore, the important parameter appears to be related to the staining pattern of mitotic chromosomes and not to the phylogenetic relationship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 19 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Chandley, A. C. & Bateman, A. J. (1962). Timing of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster using tritiated thymidine. Nature 193, 299–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comings, D. E., Kovacs, B. W., Avelino, E. & Harris, D. C. (1975). Mechanisms of chromosome banding. V. Quinacrine banding. Chromosome 50, 111–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De la Rosa, M. E., de Jimenez, J. G., Olvera, R. & Felix, R. (1972). Monosodium glutamate effects on X chromosome loss and nondisjunction in D. melanogaster. Drosophila Information Service 48, 97–98.Google Scholar
Felix, R. (1969). Programa de Genetica y Radiobiologica. In Comision Nacional de Energia Nuclear, IX Informe Anual pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
Lemeunier, F., Dutrillaux, B. & Ashburner, M. (1978). Relationships within the melanogasrer subgroup species of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). III. The mitotic chromosomes and quinacrine fluorescent patterns of the polytene chromosomes. Chromosoma 69, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramel, C. & Magnusson, J. (1969). Genetic effects of organic mercury compounds, II. Chromosome segregation in D. melanogaster. Hereditas 61, 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, P. L. & Bobrow, M. (1970). Definitive evidence for the short arm of the Y chromosome associating with the X chromosome during meiosis in the human male. Nature 226, 959–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsakas, S. C. & Tsacas, L. (1984). A phenetic tree of eighteen species of the melanogaster group of Drosophila using allozyme data as compared with classifications based on other criteria. Genetica 64, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmering, S. (1976). Genetic and cytogenetic aspects of altered segregation phenomena in Drosophila. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila (ed. Ashburner, M. and Novitski, E.), pp. 569–613. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar