Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:44:58.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex ratio distortion and semi-sterility in the progeny of irradiated Glossina morsitans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

C. F. Curtis
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, Langford, Bristol, England
P. A. Langley
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, Langford, Bristol, England
A. R. Mews
Affiliation:
Seibersdorf Laboratory, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
E. D. Offori
Affiliation:
Seibersdorf Laboratory, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
D. I. Southern
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
P. E. Bell
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Male Glossina morsitans were subjected to various doses of gamma radiation in air or nitrogen and mated to untreated females. The sex ratio of the F1 progeny was biased towards males, and this may be explained by the extra vulnerability to dominant lethal induction that the presence of the large X chromosome gives to female determining sperms. The mean fertility of the F1 progeny was subnormal. This was due to the induction of 50 % sterility in a large proportion of F1 individuals. Cytogenetic examination of the progeny of outcrosses of F1 individuals indicated that in most of the semi-steriles there were translocations involving the large autosomes or the Y chromosomes. Almost all the normally fertile F1 flies gave only cytogenetically normal progeny. The F1 sex-ratio distortion and semi-sterility would provide a ‘bonus’ in the application of the sterile male technique, which would amount to a 15–50% saving in the releases required to achieve a population control target compared with the requirement if the F1 was normal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

References

REFERENCES

Astaurov, B. L. & Frovlova, S. (1935). Artificially induced mutations in the silkworm (Bombyx mori). Biologicheskii Zhurnal 5, 861892.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. (1967). Die kinetische Organisation der Lepidopteran Chromosomen. Chromosoma (Berlin) 22, 110125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catcheside, D. G. & Lea, D. E. (1945). The rate of induction of dominant lethals in Drosophila melanogaster by X rays. Journal of Genetics 47, 19.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F. (1968). Radiation sterilisation and the effect of multiple mating of females in Glossina austeni. Journal of Insect Physiology 14, 13651380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, C. F. (1969). The production of partially sterile mutants in Glossina austeni. Genetical Research 13, 289301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F. (1970). The expression of induced sterility in Glossina austeni. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 64, 186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F. (1972 a). The use of simulation in the choice of an optimum radiation dose for control of Glossina morsitans. In Computer Models and the Application of the Sterile Male Technique. Vienna: I.A.E.A.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F. (1972 b). Sterility from crosses between subspecies of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans. Acta Tropica, 29, 250268.Google ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F. & Langley, P. A. (1972). The use of nitrogen and chilling in the production of radiation induced sterility in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 15, 360376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, C. F. & Robinson, A. S. (1971). Computer simulation of double translocations for pest control. Genetics 69, 97113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F., Southern, D. I., Pell, P. E. & Craig, T. A. Cameron (1972). Chromosome translocations in Glossina austeni. Genetical Research, 20, 107117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasgow, J. P. (1963). The Distribution and Abundance of Tsetse. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Itard, J. (1970 a). Sterilisation des males de Glossina morsitans morsitans et de G. tachinoides par irradiation aux rayons gamma. Proceedings of 1st Symposium on Tsetse Fly Breeding under Laboratory Conditions and its Practical Application, pp. 369383. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Itard, J. (1970 b). L'appareil reproducteur mâle des glossines. Les étapes de sa formation chez la pupe, la spematogenese. Revue d'Elevage et de Medecine vétérinaire des Pays tropicaux 23, 5781.Google Scholar
Itard, J. (1973). Stérilisation par irradiation gamma de mâles adultes de Glossines. Irradiation à faibles doses (4000 a 6000 rads) de mâles adultes de G. tachinoides. 13th Meeting of International Scientific Committee for Trypanosomiasis Research, Lagos, 1971.Google Scholar
Kntpling, E. F. (1970). Suppression of pest Lepidoptera by releasing partially sterile males. A theoretical appraisal. Bioscience 20, 465470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachance, L. E., Degrugillier, M. & Leverich, A. P. (1970). Cytogenetics of inherited partial sterility in three generations of the large milk-weed bug as related to holokinetic chromosomes. Chromosoma (Berlin) 29, 2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachance, L. E., Schmidt, C. H. & Bushland, R. C. (1967). Radiation induced sterilization. In Pest Control: Biological, Physical and Selected Chemical Methods (eds. Kilgore, W. W. and Doutt, R. L.), pp. 147196. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Langley, P. A., Curtis, C. F. & Brady, J. The viability, fertility and behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossina morsitans) sterilised by irradiation under various conditions. In preparation.Google Scholar
Laven, H. & Jost, E. (1971). Inherited semi-sterility for control of harmful insects. 1. Production of semi-sterility due to translocation in the mosquito Culex pipiens L. by X rays. Experentia 27, 471473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1954 a). Nature of the genetic effects produced by radiation. In Radiation Biology (ed. Hollaender, A.), pp. 351473. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1954 b). The manner of production of mutations by radiation. In Radiation Biology (ed. Hollaender, A.), pp. 475626. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M., Jordan, A. M. & Boyle, J. A. (1966). A promising method for rearing Glossina austeni on a small scale, based on the use of rabbits’ ears for feeding. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 60, 183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. T. & Holt, G. (1968 a). Inherited sterility in the progeny of irradiated Cabbage Loopers. Journal of Economic Entomology 61, 928931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. T. & Holt, G. (1968 b). Genetic and cytogenetic basis of radiation induced sterility in the adult male Cabbage Looper Trichoplusia ni. In Isotopes and Radiation in Entomology, pp. 391403. Vienna: I.A.E.A.Google Scholar
Proshold, F. I. & Bartell, J. A. (1970). Inherited sterility in progeny of irradiated male Tobacco Budworms: effects on reproduction, developmental time and sex ratio. Journal of Economic Entomology 63, 280285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proverbs, M. D. (1962). Sterilization of the Codling Moth by gamma radiation. Nature 194, 12971299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, D. I., Craig Cameron, T. A. & Pell, P. E. (1972 a). The meiotic sequence in Glossina morsitans morsitans. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 66, 145149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southern, D. I., Craig, T. A. Cameron & Pell, P. E. (1972 b). A critical chromosome analysis of Glossina austeni Newst. (Dipt., Glossinidae). Bulletin of entomological Research, 62, 195198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplank, F. L. (1948). Experiments in cross breeding tsetse flies. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 42, 131152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Borstel, R. C. (1960). On the nature of dominant lethality induced by radiation. Alti Associazione Genetica Italiana 5, 3550.Google Scholar