Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:04:31.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex differences in chiasma distribution along two marked mouse chromosomes: differences in chiasma distribution as a reason for sex differences in recombination frequency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Ivan P. Gorlov ,
Antonina I. Zhelezova  and
Olga Yu. Gorlova
Ivan P. Gorlov*
Affiliation:
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, 10 Lavrentiev Street, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
Antonina I. Zhelezova
Affiliation:
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, 10 Lavrentiev Street, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
Olga Yu. Gorlova
Affiliation:
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, 10 Lavrentiev Street, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Chiasma distributions along bivalents 1 and 14 in female and male mice were studied. It was shown that the average chiasma number in both chromosomes show no sex difference. There are however, significant sex differences in chiasma distribution along 1 and 14 chromosomes. In males there are two terminal chiasma peaks in chromosome 1 and one subtelomeric peak of chiasmata in chromosome 14. In females chiasma distributions are more even. According to genetic data, females produce more recombinants between loci of chromosome 1 than males do. By means of a computer simulation it was demonstrated that the differences in the average recombination frequency result from differences in chiasma distribution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 161 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Bennett, J. H., Hayman, D. L. & Hope, R. M. (1986). Novel sex differences in linkage values and meiotic chromosome behaviour in a marsupial. Nature 223, 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandley, A. (1987). The analysis of meiosis in human and mouse germ cells. In Mammalian Development. A Practical Approach, (ed. Monk, M.), pp. 99–124. Oxford: IRL Press Limited.Google Scholar
Davisson, M. T., Roderick, T. H. & Doolittle, D. P. (1989). Recombination percentages and chromosomal assignments. In Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse, (ed. Lyon, M. F. and Searle, A. G.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Stuttgart: Gustav Fisher Verlag.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. C. & Bennett, D. (1967). Sex differences in recombination of linked genes in animals. Genetical Research 9, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, E. P., Breckon, G. & Ford, C. E. (1964). An air drying method for meiotic preparations from mammalian testis. Cytogenetics 3, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forejt, J. (1973). Centromeric heterochromatin polymorphism in house mouse. Evidence from inbred strains and natural populations. Chromosoma 43, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorlov, I. P., Agulnik, A. I. & Agulnik, S.I. (1987). Determination of gene localization on mouse chromosomes by means of comparison of genetic map with pattern of chiasma distribution. Genetika 23, no. 1, 63–70 (In Russian).Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1922). Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics 12, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, D. L., Smith, M. J. & Roder, J. C. (1990). A comparative study of chiasmata in male and female Bettongia penicillata (Marsupialia). Genetica 83, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1928). Sexual difference of linkage in Gammarus chevreuxi. Journal of Genetics, 20, no. 2, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, N. & Kato, H. (1980). Analysis of crossing-over in mouse meiotic cells by BrdU labeling technique. Chromosoma 18, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G., Stuart, J. D. & Ord, J. K. (1973). The Advanced theory of statistics, 4th edn., Vol. 3. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Laurie, D. A. & Jones, G. H. (1981). Inter-individual variation in chiasma distribution in Chorthippus brunneus (Ortoptera: Acaridae). Heredity 47, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, M. F. & Kirby, M. C. (1993). Mouse chromosome atlas. Mouse genome, 91 (1), 40–80.Google Scholar
NIH/CEPH Collaborative Mapping Group. (1993). NIH/CEPH/HGMW linkage map. In Genetic Maps. Sixth edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press p. 546.Google Scholar
Polani, P. E. (1972). Centromere localization at meiosis and the position of chiasmata in the male and female mouse. Chromosoma 36, 343–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speed, R. M. (1977). The effects of ageing on the meiotic chromosomes of male and female mice. Chromosoma, 64, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, A. T. (1972). A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75, 304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traut, W. A. (1977). Study of recombination, formation of chiasmata and synaptonemal complexes in female and male meiosis of Ephestia Kuchniella (Lepidoptera). Genetica 47, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar