Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:44:00.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection for recombination in a polygenic model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

J. Maynard Smith
J. Maynard Smith
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Normalizing selection with a moving optimum can result in strong selection for increased recombination. This conclusion is based on computer simulation of an infinite, random-mating diploid population with additive, polygenic determination of the selected phenotype. There can also be selection for increased recombination with a fluctuating optimum, and with directional selection. These effects which arise in an infinite population appear to be large compared to the additional effects arising in a finite population because of the random generation of linkage disequilibrium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 269 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Bulmer, M. G. (1971). The effect of selection on genetic variability. American Naturalist 105, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B. (1976). Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment. Genetics 83, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1965). The effects of linkage on directional selection. Genetics 52, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. & Yokoyama, S. (1976). The evolutionary advantage of recombination. II. Individual selection for recombination. Genetics 83, 845–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1966). The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genetical Research 8, 269–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. Maynard (1971). What use is sex? Journal of Theoretical Biology 30, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. Maynard (1976). A short term advantage for sex and recombination through sib-competition. Journal of of Theoretical Biology 63, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard (1977). Why the genome does not congeal. Nature 268, 693–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard (1979). The effects of normalising and disruptive selection on genes for recombination. Genetical Research, 33, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M. & Lande, R. (1976). Niche width in a fluctuating environment-density independent model. American Naturalist 110, 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobeck, C., Smith, J. Maynard & Charlesworth, B. (1976). The effects of hitch-hiking on a gene for recombination. Genetics 82, 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1975). Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C. & Mitton, J. B. (1973). Why reproduce sexually? Journal of Theoretical Biology 39, 545–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed