Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:13:47.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segregation of centric Y-autosome translocations in Drosophila melanogaster: II. Segregation determinants in females

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Raphael Falk ,
Ana Rahat  and
Shula Baker
Raphael Falk
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91–904, Israel
Ana Rahat
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91–904, Israel
Shula Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91–904, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This is a study of the chromosomal segregation patterns in females of 15 Experimental stocks of Drosophila melanogaster, each carrying one element of a T (Y; 2) with a centric break-point. In each Experimental stock the relative frequency of all eight possible meiotic configurations of four relevant chromosomal elements was followed: an attached-X chromosome, a multiply-inverted chromosome 2, a free arm of chromosome 2, and a half-translocation element. Although the 15 translocation elements were broken at different sites, there were no basic differences among the Experimental stocks in their segregation patterns. The three two-by-two configurations were the most common. Comparison of this pattern with that of the segregation pattern of stocks similar but for an inversion-free chromosome 2, showed that in the Experimental stocks exchange pairing did not play a significant role in the determination of the segregation pattern.

The results of these experiments, together with the analysis of results from other published studies provide evidence against the model that had been forwarded by Grell. According to this model, chromosomes that did not participate in exchange pairing undergo another pairing cycle, in which total chromosome length is a factor in the determination of segregation.

We support a modified version of Novitski's model of premetaphase chromocenter-like chromosome aggregation. Disjunction of non-exchange chromosomes is regulated by determinants located in the proximal heterochromatin of the sex chromosomes and the autosomes. However, the specificity, especially that of the autosomal determinants, is not high. Thus, if an autosome and a sex chromosome are available, their determinants may interact-to-disjoin by default. More frequently, the determinants of the left-arm autosomal element may interact-to-disjoin with those of the right-arm chromosomal element.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 81 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Bridges, C. B. & Anderson, E. G. (1925). Crossing over in the X-chromosome of triploid females of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 10, 418–441.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A. T. C. (1973). A meiotic mutant defective in distributive disjunction in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 73, 393–428.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A. T. C. & Baker, B. S. (1982). On the control of the distribution of meiotic exchange in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 101, 81–89.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. W., Zimmering, S. & Krivshenko, J. (1955). Interchromosomal effect and segregation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 41, 911–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dävring, L. & Sunner, M. (1977). Late prophase and first metaphase in female meiosis of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 85, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1933). Studies on chromosome conjugation II. The relation between crossing over and disjunction of chromosomes. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 64, 269–309.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1934). Studies on chromosome conjugation III. Behavior of duplicating fragments. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 68, 134–162.Google Scholar
Falk, R. (1983). The effect of an unusual chromosome architecture on disjunction and non-disjunction in Drosophila. Genetical Research 41, 17–28.Google Scholar
Falk, R. & Baker, S. (1984). Production of centric-autosomal-Y translocations. Drosophila Information Service 60, 104–105.Google Scholar
Falk, R., Baker, S. & Rahat, A. (1985). Segregation of centric Y-autosome translocations in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Segregation determinants in males. Genetical Research 45, 51–79.Google Scholar
Gershenson, S. M. (1940). The nature of so-called genetically inert parts of chromosomes. Videnskap. Akad. Nauk. URSS Kiev (in Ukrainian), pp. 3–116.Google Scholar
Grell, R. F. (1962). A new model for secondary non-disjunction. The role of distributive pairing. Genetics 47, 1737–1754.Google Scholar
Grell, R. F. (1964). Chromosome size at distributive pairing in Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics 50, 151–166.Google Scholar
Grell, R. F. (1976). Distributive pairing. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, vol. 1a (ed. Ashburner, M. and Novitski, E.), pp. 435–486. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication, no. 627.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Sandler, L. (1958). The meiotic behavior of grossly deleted X chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 43, 547–563.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L., Sandler, L., Baker, B. S., Carpenter, A. T. C., Denell, R. F., Hall, J. C., Jacobs, P. A., Miklos, G. L. G., Davis, B. K., Gethmann, R. C., Hardy, R. W., Hessleb, A., Miller, S. M., Nozawa, H., Parry, D. M. & Gould-Somero, M. (1972). Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics 71, 157–184.Google Scholar
Lüning, K. G. (1982 a). Genetics of inbred Drosophila melanogaster. VI. Crossing-over in secondary non-disjunction exceptionals. Hereditas 96, 161–174.Google Scholar
Lüning, K. G. (1982 b). Genetics of inbred Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Evidence of normal chromosome pairing in the distal ends of X-chromosomes in secondary non-disjunction. Hereditas 96, 287–290.Google Scholar
Moore, C. M. & Grell, R. F. (1972). Factors affecting recognition and disjunction of chromosomes at distributive pairing in female Drosophila melanogaster. I. Total length vs. arm length. Genetics 70, 567–581.Google Scholar
Nokkala, S. & Puro, J. (1976). Cytological evidence for a chromocenter in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes. Hereditas 83, 265–268.Google Scholar
Novitski, E. (1964). An alternative to the distributive pairing hypothesis in Drosophila. Genetics 50, 1449–1451.Google Scholar
Novitski, E. (1975). Evidence for a single phase pairing theory of meiosis. Genetics 79, 63–71.Google Scholar
Novitski, E. (1978). The relation of exchange to nondisjunction in heterologous chromosome pairing in the Drosophila female. Genetics 88, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portin, P. (1975). Non-homologous chromosome pairing in female Drosophila. Before or after exchange ? Hereditas 80, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandler, L. & Szauter, P. (1978). The effect of recombination-defective meiotic mutants on fourth-chromosome crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 90, 699–712.Google Scholar