Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:40:55.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restriction enzyme banding in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

S. E. Hartley
S. E. Hartley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Molecular Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4 LA, Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fixed metaphase chromosomes of brown trout and Atlantic salmon were digested with various restriction enzymes and stained with Giemsa. C band-like patterns were produced in both species by Alu I, Dde I, Hae III and Mbo I. Alu I revealed extra chromosome bands in brown trout which allowed identification of additional chromosome pairs, while the other three enzymes produced patterns identical to C banding. In the Atlantic salmon Dde I revealed telomeric bands at all telomeres in addition to the conventional C bands and all four enzymes had differential effects on the nucleolar organizer-associated heterochromatin. The relevance of these findings to chromosome identification and constitutive heterochromatin organization in salmonid fishes is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , June 1991 , pp. 273 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

Babu, A. (1988). Heterogeneity of heterochromatin of human chromosomes as demonstrated by restriction endonuclease treatment. In Heterochromatin: Molecular and Structural Aspects (ed. Verma, R. S.), pp. 250–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Babu, A. & Verma, R. S. (1986). Expression of heterochromatin by restriction endonuclease treatment and distamycin A/DAPI staining of Indian muntjac (Muntiatus muntjak) chromosomes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 41, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cau, A., Salvadori, S., Deiana, A. M., Bella, J. L. & Mezzanotte, R. (1988). The characterization of Muraena helena L. mitotic chromosomes: karyotype, C-banding, nucleolar organizer regions, and in situ digestion with restriction endonucleases. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 47, 223–226.Google Scholar
Ferrucci, L., Romano, E. & de Stefano, G. F. (1987). The Alu I-induced bands in great apes and man: implication for heterochromatin characterization and satellite DNA distribution. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 44, 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia de Leaniz, C. & Verspoor, E. (1989). Natural hybridization between Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, and brown trout, Salmo trutta, in northern Spain. Journal of Fish Biology 34, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosalvez, J., Bella, J. L., Lopez-Fernandez, C. & Mezzanotte, R. (1987). Correlation between constitutive heterochromatin and restriction enzyme resistant chromatin in Arcyptera tornosi (Orthoptera). Heredity 59, 173–180.Google Scholar
Hartley, S. E. (1987). The chromosomes of salmonid fishes. Biological Reviews 62, 197–214.Google Scholar
Hartley, S. E. (1988). Cytogenetic studies of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in Scotland. Journal of Fish Biology 33, 735–740.Google Scholar
Hartley, S. E. & Horne, M. T. (1983). A method for obtaining mitotic figures from blood leucocyte cultures of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Journal of Fish Biology 22, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, S. E., Horne, M. T. (1984 a). Chromosome relationships in the genus Salmo. Chromosoma 90, 229–237.Google Scholar
Hartley, S. E. & Horne, M. T. (1984 b). Chromosome polymorphism and constitutive heterochromatin in the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Chromosoma 89, 377–380.Google Scholar
Hartley, S. E. & Horne, M. T. (1985). Cytogenetic techniques in fish genetics. Journal of Fish Biology 26, 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, B. (1988). The biology of heterochromatin. In Heterochromatin: Molecular and Structural Aspects (ed. Verma, R. S.), pp. 1–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. A. & Thorgaard, G. H. (1988). Restriction endonuclease banding of rainbow trout chromosomes. Chromosoma 96, 171–177.Google Scholar
Marchi, A. & Mezzanotte, R. (1988). Restriction endonuclease digestion and chromosome banding in the mosquito, Culiseta longiareolata (Diptera: Culicidae). Heredity 60, 21–26.Google Scholar
Medrano, L., Bernardi, G., Couturier, J., Dutrillaux, B. & Bernardi, G. (1988). Chromosome banding and genome compartmentalization in fishes. Chromosoma, 96 178–183.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A., Choi, Y.-C. & Miller, O. J. (1983). Chromosome localization of highly repetitive human DNAs and amplified ribosomal DNA with restriction enzymes. Science 219, 395–397.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. B. & Hartley, S. E. (1988). Fluorescent banding patterns of the chromosomes of the genus Salmo. Genome 30, 193–197.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. & de Almeida, C. G. (1988). Chromosome banding in amphibia. XII. Restriction endonuclease banding. Chromosoma 96, 283–290.Google Scholar
Sumner, A. T. (1972). A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75, 304–306.Google Scholar
Verspoor, E. (1988). Widespread hybridization between native Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, and introduced brown trout, S. trutta, in eastern Newfoundland. Journal of Fish Biology 32, 327–334.Google Scholar