Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:29:30.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regulation of enzyme activities in Drosophila: II. Characterization of enzyme responses in aneuploid flies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

John M. Rawls Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Curriculum in Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, U.S.A.
John C. Lucchesi
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Curriculum in Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To test whether large changes in the enzyme levels of segmentally aneuploid Drosophila melanogaster can be ascribed to changes in kinetic properties of the enzymes affected, comparisons have been made with regard to the heat stability, substrate concentration dependency, and the presence of heat-stable inhibitors or activators within the extracts of aneuploid and control flies. By these criteria, no differences were found between controls and the α-GPDH activity of flies trisomic for chromosome II segments 27D–31E, 35A–40, 41–45F, and 57B–60F and no differences were evident between the IDH properties of 70CD–71B aneuploids and their controls. The enzyme changes observed in these aneuploids are more likely associated with changes in the rates of accumulation of the enzyme molecules. The IDH of flies trisomic for the 27D–31E region was more heat-stable than that of controls while the α-GPDH of flies trisomic for the 21A–25CD region displayed an apparent Michaelis constant for α-glycerophosphate lower than that of controls. The possible bases for these latter qualitative distinctions are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Bewley, G. C., Rawls, J. M. & Lucchesi, J. C. (1974). α-Glycerophosphate dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster: kinetic differences and developmental differentiation of the larval and adult isozymes. Journal of Insect Physiology 20, 153166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, C. B. (1935). Salivary chromosome maps. Journal of Heredity 26, 6064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, W. W. (1967). The statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic data. Advances in Enzymology 29, 132.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication No. 627.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L., Sandler, L., Baker, B. S., Carpenter, A. T. C., Denell, R. E., Hall, J. C., Jacobs, P. A., Miklos, G. L. G., Davies, B. D., Gethmann, R. C., Hardy, R. W., Hessler, A., Miller, S. M., Nozawa, H., Parry, D. M. & Gould-Somero, M. (1972). Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics 71, 157184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucchesi, J. C. & Rawls, J. M. (1973). Regulation of gene function: a comparison of enzyme activity levels in relation to gene dosage in diploids and triploids of Drosophila melanogaster. Biochemical Genetics 9, 4151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawls, J. M. & Lucchesi, J. C. (1974). Regulation of enzyme activities in Drosophila. I. The detection of regulatory loci by gene dosage responses. Genetical Research 24, 5972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, D. A. & Shaw, C. R. (1969). Genetics and ontogeny of α-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase isozymes in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochemical Genetics 3, 343353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed