Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:31:21.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recombination and the evolution of satellite DNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Wolfgang Stephan
Wolfgang Stephan
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In eukaryotic chromosomes, large blocks of satellite DNA are associated with regions of reduced meiotic recombination. No function of highly repeated, tandemly arranged DNA sequences has been identified so far at the cellular level, though the structural properties of satellite DNA are relatively well known. In studying the joint action of meiotic recombination, genetic drift and natural selection on the copy number of a family of highly repeated DNA (HRDNA), this paper looks at the structure–function debate for satellite DNA from the standpoint of molecular population genetics. It is shown that (i) HRDNA accumulates most probably in regions of near zero crossing over (heterochromatin), and that (ii), due to random genetic drift the effect of unequal crossover on copy numbers is stronger, the smaller the population size. As a consequence, highly repeated sequences are likely to persist longest (over evolutionary times) in small populations. The results are based on a fairly general class of models of unequal crossing over and natural selection which have been treated both analytically and by computer simulation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , June 1986 , pp. 167 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

Brutlag, D. L. (1980). Molecular arrangement and evolution of heterochromatic DNA. Annual Review of Genetics 14, 121–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B., Langley, C. H. & Stephan, W. (1986). The evolution of restricted recombination and the accumulation of repeated DNA sequences. Genetics (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig-Holmes, A. P., Moore, F. B. & Shaw, M. W. (1975). Polymorphism of human C-band heterochromatin. II. Family studies with suggestive evidence of somatic crossing over. American Journal of Human Genetics 27, 178–189.Google ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1979). Mathematical Population Genetics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Flavell, R. B. (1982). Sequence amplification, deletion and rearrangement: major sources of variation during species divergence. In Genome Evolution (eds. Dover, G. A. and Flavell, R. B.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics, an Introduction. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V. & Thein, S. L. (1985). Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, B. & Miklos, G. L. G. (1979). Functional aspects of satellite DNA and heterochromatin. International Review of Cytology 58, 1–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krüger, J. & Vogel, F. (1975). Population genetics of unequal crossing over. Journal of Molecular Evolution 4, 201–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maresca, A., Singer, M. F. & Lee, T. N. H. (1984). Continuous reorganization leads to extensive polymorphism in a monkey centromeric satellite. Journal of Molecular Biology 179, 629–649.Google Scholar
Miklos, G. L. G. (1982). Sequencing and manipulating highly repeated DNA. In Genome Evolution (eds. Dover, G. A. and Flavell, R. B.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moran, P. A. P. (1962). The Statistical Processes of Evolutionary Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ohta, T. (1983). Theoretical study on the accumulation of selfish DNA. Genetical Research 41, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, T. & Kimura, M. (1981). Some calculations on the amount of selfish DNA. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, USA 78, 1129–1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, W. J., Lohe, A. R., Gerlach, W. L., Dunsmuir, P., Dennis, E. S. & Appels, R. (1977). Fine structure and evolution of DNA in heterochromatin. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 42, 1121–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelson, A. S. & Bell, G. I. (1977). Mathematical models for the evolution of multigene families by unequal crossing over. Nature 265, 304–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schimke, R. T. (1984). Gene amplification in cultured animal cells. Cell 37, 705–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seabright, M., Gregson, N. & Mould, S. (1976). Trisomy 9 associated with an enlarged segment in a liveborn. Human Genetics 34, 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, F. & Varshavsky, A. (1984). A protein binds to a satellite DNA repeat at three specific sites that would be brought into mutual proximity by DNA folding in the nucleosome. Cell 37, 889–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szauter, P. (1984). An analysis of regional constraints on exchange in Drosophila melanogaster using recombination defective meiotic mutants. Genetics 106, 45–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahata, N. (1981). Mathematical study of the distribution of the number of repeated genes per chromosomes. Genetical Research 38, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kampen, N. G. (1975). The expansion of the master equation. In Advances in Chemical Physics (eds. Prigogine, I. and Rice, S. A.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. B. (1985). Interaction of selection and biased gene conversion in a multigene family. Proceedings National Academy Sciences, USA 82, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar