Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:19:02.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny: I. Ontogenetic changes in quantitative genetic variance components in randombred mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

James M. Cheverud ,
Larry J. Leamy ,
William R. Atchley  and
J. J. Rutledge
James M. Cheverud
Affiliation:
Departments of Anthropology and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Larry J. Leamy
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, California State University, Long Beach, California, 90840
William R. Atchley
Affiliation:
Department of EntomologyUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706 Department of GeneticsUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706
J. J. Rutledge
Affiliation:
Department of GeneticsUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706 Department of Meat and Animal Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report the results of an ontogenetic analysis of quantitative genetic variance components with two replicates drawn from the randombred ICR strain of mice. A total of 432 mice from 108 full-sib families raised in a cross-fostering design were used to estimate direct effects heritability, maternal effects, and environmental effects for weight, head length, trunk length, trunk circumference, and tail length at 17, 24, 31, 38, 45, 52, 59, and 66 days of age. There was no significant difference in heritability between the replicates. Heritabilities either stayed more or less constant with age at about 0·30 (weight, trunk length, trunk circumference) or increased slightly with age (head length, tail length). Maternal effects decreased with age from a maximum of about 0·50 at weaning to about 0·15 at age 66 when growth was nearly complete. Environmental effects increased in relative importance during ontogeny.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 65 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Ahlschwede, W. & Robison, O. (1971). Prenatal and postnatal influences on growth and backfat in swine. Journal of Animal Science 32, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberch, P., Gould, S., Oster, G. & Wake, D. (1979). Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5, 296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atchley, W. & Rutledge, J. (1980). Genetic components of size and shape. I. Dynamics of components of phenotypic variability and covariability during ontogeny in the laboratory rat. Evolution 34, 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonner, J. (1974). On Development: The Biology of Form. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chopra, S. & Acharya, R. (1971). Genetic and phenotypic parameters of body weights in Bikaneri sheep (Magra strain). Animal Production 13, 343–347.Google Scholar
Cock, A. (1966). Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 41, 131–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillard, E., Vaccaro, R., Lozano, J. & Robison, O. (1972). Phenotypic and genetic parameters for growth in guinea pigs. Journal of Animal Science 34, 193–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dzakuma, J., Nielsen, M. & Doane, T. (1978). Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for growth and wool traits in Hampshire sheep. Journal of Animal Science 47, 1014–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Oksh, H., Sutherland, P. & Williams, J. (1967). Prenatal and postnatal maternal influence on growth in mice. Genetics 57, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Helwig, J. & Council, K. (1979). SAS User's Guide. Raleigh: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Herbert, J., Kidwell, J. & Chase, H. (1979). The inheritance of growth and form in the mouse. IV. Changes in the variance components of weight, tail length, and tail width during growth. Growth 43, 36–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Jara-Almonte, M. & White, J. (1973). Genetic relationships among milk yield, growth, feed intake and efficiency in laboratory mice. Journal of Animal Science 37, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlers, D., Chapman, A. & First, N. (1977). Estimates of maternal and grandmaternal influences on weights and gains of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 44, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. (1982). A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63, 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, T., Sales, D., Smith, C. & Nicholson, D. (1980). Phenotypic and genetic parameters for lamb weights in a synthetic line of sheep. Animal Production 30, 261–269.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A., Louca, A. & Robison, O. (1980). Estimates of genetic parameters for preweaning and post-weaning growth traits in Chios lambs. Animal Production 30, 271–276.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A., Dillard, E. & Robison, O. (1978). Genetic analysis of postweaning performance of Hereford bulls. Journal of Animal Science 47, 1004–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, L. & Falconer, D. (1966). Compensatory growth and sexual maturity in mice. Animal Production 8, 179–192.Google Scholar
Riedl, R. (1979). Order in Living Organisms. New York: J. H. Wiley.Google Scholar
Rutledge, J., Robison, O., Eisen, E. & Legates, J. (1972). Dynamics of genetic and maternal effects in mice. Journal of Animal Science 35, 911–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trail, J., Sacker, G. & Fisher, I. (1971). Crossbreeding beef cattle in western Uganda. 3. Genetic analysis of body weight. Animal Production 13, 153–163.Google Scholar
Young, C., Legates, J. & Farthing, B. (1965). Prenatal and post-natal influences on growth, prolificacy, and maternal performance in mice. Genetics 52, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar