Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:22:09.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative genetic variation in the skeleton of the mouse: I. Variation between inbred strains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

D. P. Lovell  and
F. M. Johnson
D. P. Lovell
Affiliation:
MRC Laboratory Animals Centre, Woodmansterne Road, Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 4EF, England
F. M. Johnson
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health, Sciences Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A series of six bones from samples of mice from eleven inbred strains and one F1 hybrid were measured using a simple apparatus. The bones examined were the mandible, os coxae, femur, tibia–fibula, scapula and humerus. Considerable variation in the shape of each bone was found and successful discrimination between the strains was obtained. Correct strain classification ranged from 87% for the scapula to 98% for the os coxae. Gross abnormalities and quantitative variants were identified.

As the pattern of discrimination is different for each bone, the use of other bones in addition to the mandible may improve resolution in the identification and quality control of mouse stocks. The objective and precise identification of abnormal and variant bones suggests that the method may be useful for population studies and for the detection of induced skeletal abnormalities in toxicological investigations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , October 1983 , pp. 169 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, D. W. (1956). A comparison of genetic and environmental principal components of morphogenesis in mice. Growth 20, 63–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Bailey, D. W. (1959). Rates of subline divergence in highly inbred strains of mice. Journal of Heredity 50, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, R. J., Jakobson, M. E. & Peters, J. (1978). The house mice of the Faroe Islands: A study in microdifferentiation. Journal of Zoology, London 185, 73–92.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J. & Brown, M. B. (eds) (1979). BMDP-79 Biomedical Computer Programs P-series. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Festing, M. F. W. (1972). Mouse strain identification. Nature 238, 351–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festing, M. F. W. (1973). A multi-variate analysis of subline divergence in the shape of the mandible in C57BL/Gr mice. Genetical Research 21, 121–132.Google Scholar
Festing, M. F. W. & Wolff, G. L. (1979). Quantitative characters of potential value in studying mutagenesis. Genetics 92, S173–S179.Google ScholarPubMed
Festing, M. F. W. & Lovell, D. P. (1980). Routine genetic monitoring of commercial and other mouse colonies in the U.K. using mandible shape; five years of experience. 7th ICLAS Symposium Utrecht, 1979, pp. 341–349. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1952). Genetica! studies on the skeleton of the mouse. IV. Quasi-continuous variations. Journal of Genetics 51, 95–114.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1963). The pathology of development. A Study of Inherited Skeletal Disorders in Animals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. M., Roberts, G. T., Sharma, R. K., Chasalow, F., Zweidinger, R., Morgan, A., Hendren, R. W. & Lewis, S. E. (1981). The detection of mutants in mice by lectrophoresis: results of a model induction experiment with procarbazine. Genetics 97, 113–124.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. M. & Lewis, S. E. (1981). Electrophoretically detected germinal mutations induced in the mouse by ethylnitrosourea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 78, 3138–3141.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1975). Multivariate Analysis. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Leamy, L. (1977). Genetic and environmental correlations of morphometric traits in random bred house mouse. Evolution 31, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamy, L. (1982). Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mouse. I. Patterns in the mean values. Journal of Heredity 73, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell, D. P. & Festing, M. F. W. (1982). Relationships among colonies of the laboratory rat. Journal of Heredity 73, 81–82.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. T. & Sage, R. D. (1981). Taxonomy of the house mouse. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 47, 15–25.Google Scholar
Russell, W. L. (1979). Comments on mutagenesis risk assessment. Genetics 92, S187–S194.Google Scholar
Selby, P. B. (1979). Induced skeletal mutations. Genetics 92, S127–S133.Google Scholar
Selby, P. B. & Selby, P. R. (1977). Gamma-ray induced dominant mutations that cause skeletal abnormalities in mice. I. Plan, summary of results and discussion. Mutation Research 43, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Self, S. G. & Leamy, L. (1978). Heritability of quasi-continuous skeletal traits in a random bred population of house mice. Genetics 88, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, K. F. (1957). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XXI. The girdles and the long limb bones. Journal of Genetics 55, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, R. S. (1981). The morphometrics of the mouse: a review. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 47, 85–125.Google Scholar