Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:09:01.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A quantitative genetic analysis of fitness and its components in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Trudy F. C. Mackay
Trudy F. C. Mackay
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Forty-one third chromosomes extracted from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster were assessed for net fitness and for the quantitative characters viability, net fertility, female productivity, male weight, abdominal bristle number, and sternopleural bristle number. Net homozygous and heterozygous fitness of the third chromosomes was estimated by competition against a marked balancer third chromosome. Average fitness of the homozygous lines relative to wild-type heterozygotes was 0·13, indicating substantial inbreeding depression for net fitness. All significant correlations of quantitative characters with fitness and with each other were high and positive. Homozygous fitness is strongly correlated with net fertility, viability, and female productivity, moderately associated with male weight, and not significantly associated with bristle traits. The combination of metric traits which best predicts homozygous fitness is the simple multiple of viability and female productivity. Heterozygous fitness is not correlated with homozygous fitness; furthermore, the relative contribution of metric traits to fitness in a heterozygous population is likely to be different from that deduced from homozygous lines. These observations are consistent with a model of genetic variation for fitness in natural populations caused by segregation of rare deleterious recessive alleles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 59 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

Anderson, W. W. (1969). Selection in experimental populations. I. Lethal genes. Genetics 62, 653–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dykhuizen, D. E., De Framond, J. & Hartl, D. L. (1984). Potential for hitch-hiking in the eda-edd-Zwf gene cluster of Escherichia coli. Genetical Research 43, 229–239.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1981). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn., 340 pp. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Giesel, J. T. & Zettler, E. E. (1980). Genetic correlations of life-historical parameters and certain fitness indices in Drosophila melanogaster: rm, rs, diet breadth. Oecologia 47, 229–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haymer, D. S. & Hartl, D. L. (1982). The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. I. Comparative measures of competitive reproductive success. Genetics 102, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haymer, D. S. & Hartl, D. L. (1983). The experimental assessment of fitness in Drosophila. II. A comparison of competitive and non-competitive measures. Genetics 104, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, J. F. & Kidwell, M. G. (1966). The effects of inbreeding on body weight and abdominal chaeta number in Drosophila melanogaster. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 8, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidwell, M. G., Kidwell, J. F. & Sved, J. A. (1977). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: A syndrome of aberrant traits including mutation, sterility, and male recombination. Genetics 86, 813–833.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary change, 346 pp. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication, no. 627.Google Scholar
Pignatelli, P. M. (1983). Norms of reaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Honours thesis, Department of Genetics, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1952). The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics 37, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, A. (1955). Selection in animals: synthesis. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium in Quantitative Biology 20, 225–229.Google Scholar
Rose, M. R. (1984). Genetic covariation in Drosophila life history: Untangling the data. American Naturalist 123, 565–569.Google Scholar
Simmons, M. J. & Crow, J. F. (1977). Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annual Review of Genetics 11, 49–78.Google Scholar
Sved, J. A. (1971). An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 18, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sved, J. A. (1975). Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 25, 197–200.Google Scholar
Sved, J. A. & Ayala, F. J. (1970). A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 66, 97–113.Google Scholar
Tantawy, A. O. & Reeve, E. C. R. (1956). Studies in quantitative inheritance. IX. The effects of inbreeding at different rates in Drosophila melanogaster. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs-und Verer bungslehre 87, 648–667.Google ScholarPubMed
Tracey, M. L. & Ayala, F. J. (1974). Genetic load in natural populations: Is it compatible with the hypothesis that many polymorphisms are maintained by natural selection? Genetics 11, 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UFAW Handbook on the care and management of laboratory animals. (1967). Edinburgh: E. and S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, T. & Hirose, Y. (1984). Genetic analysis of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. II. The measurement of fitness and fitness components in homozygous lines. Genetics 108, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed