Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:52:25.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative genetic analysis in Phalaris tuberosa I. The statistical theory of open-pollinated progenies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

B. D. H. Latter
B. D. H. Latter
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, C.S.I.R.O., Canberra, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present series of papers is concerned with the variation shown by date of ear emergence, seed weight, and measures of seedling growth rate in the Australian Commercial population of Phalaris tuberosa L. In this first communication, the statistical theory necessary for the interpretation of the available experimental observations is developed. The treatment involves a consideration of the effects of partial self-fertilization under open-pollination, of phenotypic assortative mating, and of maternal effects, on the expectations of the observed covariances among relatives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , November 1965 , pp. 360 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, J. H. & Binet, F. E. (1956). Association between Mendelian factors with mixed selfing and random mating. Heredity, Lond. 10, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. (1947). Composition of hog carcasses as influenced by heritable differences in rate and economy of gain. Res. Bull. Iowa agric. Exp. Stn, 354, 492–524.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1918). On the correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52, 399–433.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1924). A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. II. Biol. Rev. 1, 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, B. I. (1953). Mixed selfing and random mating when homozygotes are at a disadvantage. Heredity, Lond. 7, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. (1953). Studies in quantitative inheritance. III: Heritability and genetic correlation in progeny tests using different mating systems. J. Genet. 51, 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. (1955). The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 11, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. (1961). A note on non-random mating in progeny tests. Genet. Res. 2, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. III: Assortative mating based on somatic resemblance. Genetics, 6, 144–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed