Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:40:42.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein variation in strains of mice differing in body size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

I. Garnett  and
D. S. Falconer
I. Garnett
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh 9, Scotland
D. S. Falconer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh 9, Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nine (41%) of the 22 enzymic and non-enzymic loci examined in a strain of mice divergently selected for six-week body weight (six lines selected in each direction and six controls) were found to be polymorphic. The degree of polymorphism varied between the replicates from a maximum of 38% to a minimum of 14% with an average individual heterozygous at 7·7% of its loci. There was no obvious association between any of the isozyme variants and body size. The frequency distribution among the 18 lines was adequately accounted for by random genetic drift. However, an association was observed between body size and the Hbb locus; the Hbbs allele was found to be fixed in all of the six Large lines. An examination of the variance of gene frequencies at this locus excluded random genetic drift as an explanation for the fixation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 45 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Al-Murrani, W. (1973). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. K. (1970). Ecological structure and gene flow in small mammals. Variation in Mammalian Populations, ed. Berry, E. J. and Southern, H. N.. Zoological Soc. of London Symposia, vol. 26, pp. 299–325.Google Scholar
Brown, A. H. D. (1971). Isozyme variation under selection in Zea mays. Nature 232, 570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. V. & Nordskog, A. W. (1962). Correlated responses in blood group frequencies with selection for body weight and egg weight in the fowl. Genetics 47, 945 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Cooper, D. W. (1968). The significance level in multiple tests made simultaneously. Heredity 23, 614–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruden, D. (1949). The computation of inbreeding coefficients in closed populations. Journal of Heredity 40, 248–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delorenzo, R. J. & Ruddle, F. H. (1969). Genetic control of two electrophoretic variants of glucosephosphate isomerase in the mouse (Mus musculus). Biochemical Genetics 3, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delorenzo, R. J. & Ruddle, R. H. (1970). Glutamate oxalate transaminase (Got) genetics in Mus musculus: linkage, polymorphism and phenotypes of Got-2 and Got-1 loci. Biochemical Genetics 4, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. (1973). Replicated selection for body weight in mice. Genetical Research 22, 291–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grühn, R. & Dinklage, H. (1971). Blutgruppen- und proteinpolymorphismus beim Gottingen miniaturschwein. Zeitschchrift fur Versuchstierkunde 13, 179–187.Google Scholar
Henderson, N. S. (1965). Isozymes of citrate dehydrogenase: subunit structure and intracellular location. Journal of Experimental Zoology 158, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, J. J. & Roderick, T. H. (1970). Linkage analyses using biochemical variants in mice. III. Linkage relationships of eleven biochemical markers. Biochemical Genetics 4, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraeling, R. R., Gerrits, R. J. & Young, E. P. (1971). Transferrin and pre-albumin polymorphisms in swine selected for backfat thickness. Journal of Animal Science 32, 174–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, W. H. P. & Truslove, G. H. (1969). Electrophoretic heterogeneity of mouse erythrocyte peptidases. Biochemical Genetics 3, 493–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petras, M. L. (1967). Studies of natural populations of Mus. I. Biochemical polymorphisms and their bearing on breeding structure. Evolution 21, 259–274.Google ScholarPubMed
Ruddle, F. H., Shows, T. B. & Roderick, T. H. (1968). Autosomal control of an electrophoretic variant glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the mouse (Mus musculus). Genetics 58, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruddle, F. H., Shows, T. B. & Roderick, T. H. (1969 a). Esterase genetics in Mus musculus: expression, linkage and polymorphism of locus Es-2. Genetics 62, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruddle, F. H., Roderick, T. H., Shows, T. B., Weigl, P. G., Chipman, R. K. & Anderson, P. K. (1969 b). Measurement of genetic heterogeneity by means of enzyme polymorphisms. Journal of Heredity 60, 321–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selander, R. K., Hunt, W. G. & Yang, S. Y. (1969). Protein polymorphism and genic heterozygosity in two European subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 23, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. K. & Yang, S. Y. (1969). Protein polymorphism and genic heterozygosity in a wild population of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Genetics 63, 653–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. R. & Prasad, R. (1970). Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes–a compilation of recipes. Biochemical Genetics 4, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shows, T. B. & Ruddle, F. H. (1958). Malate dehydrogenase: evidence for tetrameric structure in Mus musculus. Science 160, 1356–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shreffler, D. C. (1969). Genetic control of serum transferrin types in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A. 46, 1376–1384.Google Scholar
Wegmann, T. C. & Gilman, J. G. (1970). Chimerism for three genetic systems in tetraparental mice. Developmental Biology 21, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed