Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:44:21.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Position effect variegation in the mouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Bruce M. Cattanach
Bruce M. Cattanach
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, OX11 0RD, Oxon.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Position effect variegation has been studied in female mice heterozygous for the flecked X-autosome translocation, T(7; X)Ct. Some of these carried the spotting gene (s) which clarifies the variegated patterns. Others carried a second X-autosome translocation, T(X; 16)16H, which suppresses the randomness of X-chromosome activity.

It was found the position effect variegation stems primarily from early occurring events which lead to the formation of clones of cells with different phenotypes. In this respect the phenomenon appears to parallel that found in Drosophila. However, in the mouse, late-occurring events are also found which can only be readily accounted for by the reactivation of previously inactive loci. They occur, not only during foetal development, but throughout the life-time of the animals and in a manner which suggests they derive from a progressive retreat of the inactivating influence of the heterochromatic X chromosome back along the attached autosome towards the breakpoint. It is proposed that the early occurring events do not lay down fixed programmes of gene suppression, as proposed for Drosophila, but that, like the later-occurring events, they represent the reactivation of previously inactivated loci. The possibility that this might also be true for Drosophila is discussed.

The study also provided evidence favouring the view that the X-chromosome controlling element, Xce, modifies the heterozygous phenotypes of X-linked genes by biasing the randomness of the X-inactivation process, rather than by operating through cell selection mechanisms. The data also support and extend Mintz's (1967) concept of pigment pattern differentiation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 291 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Baker, W. K. (1971). Evidence for position effect suppression of the ribosomal RNA cistrone in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68, 2472–2476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. (1961). A chemically-induced variegated-type position effect in the mouse. Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre 92, 165–182.Google ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M. (1966). Genetical tests of the spreading effect. Mouse Newsletter 35, 23–24.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. (1970). Controlling elements in the mouse X-chromosome. III. Influence upon both parts of an X divided by rearrangement. Genetical Research 16, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. (1972). X chromosome controlling element (Xce). Mouse Newsletter 47, 33.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. & Isaacson, J. H. (1965). Genetic control over the inactivation of auto-somal genes attached to the X-chromosome. Zeitschrift fur Vererbungslehre 96, 313–323.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M., Pollard, C. F. & Perez, J. N. (1969). Controlling elements in the mouse X-chromosome. I. Interaction with the X-linked genes. Genetical Research 14, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M. & Williams, C. E. (1972). Evidence of non-random X chromosome activity in the mouse. Genetical Research 19, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M., Wolfe, H. G. & Lyon, M. F. (1972). A comparative study of the coats of chimaeric mice and those of heterozygotes for X-linked genes. Genetical Research 19, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, H. B. (1949). Greying of hair. I. Effects produced by single doses of X rays on mice. Journal of Morphology 84, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, P. R. (1973). Hypothesis on differentiation and the inheritance of gene superstructure. Nature 245, 23–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deol, M. S. & Whitten, W. K. (1972). Time of X chromosome inactivation in retinal melanocytes of the mouse. Nature New Biology 238, 159–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eicher, E. M. (1970). X-autosome translocations in the mouse: total inactivation versus partial inactivation of the X chromosome. Advances in Genetics 15, 175–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüneberg, H. (1943). The development of some external features in mouse embryos. Journal of Heredity 34, 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1967). Gene action in the mammalian X-chromosome. Genetical Research 9, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadorn, E., Gsell, R. & Schultz, J. (1970). Stability of position effect variegation in normal and transdetermined larval blastemas from Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 65, 633–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. F. (1961). Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. F. (1966). Lack of evidence that inactivation of the mouse X-chromosome is incomplete. Genetical Research 8, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. F. (1972). X-chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals. Biological Reviews 47, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. F., Searle, A. G., Ford, C. E. & Ohno, S. (1964). A mouse translocation suppressing sex-linked variegation. Cytogenetics 3, 306–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, B. (1967). Gene control of mammalian pigmentary differentiation. I. Clonal origin of melanocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 58, 344–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, B. (1970). Gene expression in allophenic mice. In Control Mechanisms in the Expression of Cellular Phenotypes (ed. Padykula, H. A.). Symposium of the International Society for Cell Biology 9, 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohno, S. & Lyon, M. F. (1965). Cytological study of Searle's X-autosome translocation in Mus musculus. Chromosoma (Berl.) 16, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawles, M. E. (1947). Origin of pigment cells from the neural crest in the mouse embryo. Physiological Zoology 20, 248–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, S. C. & Henderson, J. M. (1940). Pigment cell migration in mouse epidermis. Journal of Experimental Zoology 85, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, L. B. (1961). Genetics of mammalian sex chromosomes. Science 133, 1795–1803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, L. B. (1963). Mammalian X-chromosome action: inactivation limited in spread and in region of origin. Science 140, 976–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, L. B. & Montgomery, C. L. (1970). Comparative studies on X-autosome trans-locations in the mouse. II. Inactivation of autosomal loci, segregation, and mapping of autosomal breakpoints in five T(X; 1)'s. Genetics 64, 281–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaible, R. H. (1969). Clonal distribution of melanocytes in piebald-spotted and variegated mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology 172, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed