Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:02:16.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polygene analysis II. Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Neil Gilbert
Neil Gilbert
Affiliation:
John Innes Institute, Bayfordbury, Hertford, Herts.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A modest theory of polygene selection is presented. Recently published data show that the curved model of gene action (presented in a previous paper) is insufficiently general. The curved model does, however, show that the scaling tests (used in the additive type of polygene analysis) do not guarantee additivity; they guarantee a state of indeterminacy, in which additivity is one of a range of reasonable possibilities. These different possibilities give entirely different predictions of selective advance. The failure (in practice) of polygene analysis does not reduce the value of polygene concepts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , November 1961 , pp. 456 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

References

REFERENCES

Giesbrecht, J. (1961). The inheritance of ear height in Zea mays. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 3, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (1961). Polygene analysis. Genet. Res. 2, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, K. (1943). Polygenic inheritance and natural selection. Biol. Rev. 18, 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, K. (1949). Biometrical Genetics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar