Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:08:47.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pattern and frequency of nocodazole induced meiotic nondisjunction in oocytes of mice carrying the ‘tobacco mouse’ metacentric Rb(16.17)7Bnr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

C. A. Everett  and
J. B. Searle
C. A. Everett*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
J. B. Searle
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Oocytes from (C3H/HeH × 101/H)F1 and Rb(16.17)7Bnr homozygous females were exposed to a range of doses of nocodazole in vitro. The spindle poison caused a dose dependent increase in metaphase I (MI) arrest and hyperploidy. A concentration of 0·03 μg/ml was found to induce a maximum hyperploid frequency of 3·1% and 11·6% respectively without a high level of MI arrest. Between 0·03 and 0·05 μg/ml MI arrest increased substantially and reached a frequency of approximately 90%. In a further experiment oocytes from Rb7 homozygous, heterozygous and 3H1 females were exposed to 0·03 μg/ml nocodazole 4, 6 or 8 h after the onset of maturation. The phase at which the spindle was inhibited resulted in a specific pattern of nondisjunction which in turn was dependent on whether the female carried an Rb metacentric. 3H1 oocytes gave a normally distributed pattern of increase in aneuploid frequency (over the spontaneous value) centering around a 6 h application. This was thought to be due to the interaction of chromosomes with the microtubules of the spindle during attachment and/or alignment. In contrast both Rb homozygotes and heterozygotes gave the same biphasic response, with a high frequency of aneuploidy in the oocytes when nocodazole was applied 4 and 8 h after the onset of maturation. In Rb homozygotes we demonstrated that the Rb bivalent underwent nondisjunction more frequently than the average acrocentric, when nocodazole was administered early. It can be assumed that the Rb trivalent in Rb heterozygotes showed a similar response. This early Rb specific effect, in combination with a delayed-version of the acrocentric effect found in the 3H1 mice was thought to generate the biphasic pattern. We discuss the implications of (a) the different meiotic behaviours of metacentrics and acrocentrics and (b) the meiotic delay in Rb mice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , August 1995 , pp. 35 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

Antonarkis, S. E., Peterson, M. B., Mclnnis, M. G., Adelsberg, P. A. et al. , (1992). The meiotic stage of nondisjunction in trisomy 21: Determination by using DNA polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 50, 544–550.Google Scholar
Bond, D. J., & Chandley, A. C., (1983). Aneuploidy (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
Boué, A., Boué, J., & Gropp, A., (1985). Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage. Advances in Human Genetics 14, 1–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M., & Moseley, H., (1973). Nondisjunction and reduced fertility caused by the tobacco mouse metacentric chromosomes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 12, 264–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, R. P., (1968). Maturation of the mouse oocyte in vitro. I Sequence and timing of nuclear progression. Journal of Experimental Zoology 169, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, R. G., (1965). Maturation in vitro of mouse, sheep, cow, pig, rhesus monkey and human ovarian oocytes. Nature 208, 349–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, R. G., & Searle, A. G., (1963). Genetic radio-sensitivity of specific post-dictyate stages in mouse oocytes. Genetical Research 4, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenlaub-Ritter, U., (1993). Studies on maternal agerelated aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes and cell-cycle control. Chromosomes Today 11, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenlaub-Ritter, U., (1994). Mechanisms of nondisjunction in mammalian meiosis. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 29, 281–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichenlaub-Ritter, U., & Boll, I., (1989). Nocodazole sensitivity, age-related aneuploidy and alterations in the cell cycle during maturation of mouse oocytes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 52, 170–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, C. A., (1992). Robertsonian translocations and their effect on the fertility of mice. DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Generoso, W. M., Mitchell, T. J., Bishop, J. B., Cain, K. T., Hughes, L. A., Katoh, M., & Foxworth, L. B., (1989). Chromosome malsegregation and embryonic lethality induced by treatment of normally ovulated mouse oocytes with nocodazole. Mutation Research 210, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gropp, A., & Winking, H., (1981). Robertsonian translocations: Cytology, meiosis, segregation patterns and biological consequences of heterozygosity. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 47, 141–181.Google Scholar
Hansmann, I., & El-Nahass, E., (1979). Incidence of nondisjunction in mouse oocytes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 24, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansmann, I., de Boer, P., & Speed, R. M., (1988). Aneuploidy related delay of meiotic development in the mouse and Djungarian hamster. In The Cytogenetics of Mammalian Autosomal Rearrangements. (ed. Daniel, A.), pp. 295–314. New York: Liss.Google Scholar
Hassold, T. J., & Jacobs, P., (1984). Trisomy in man. Annual Reviews of Genetics 18, 69–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassold, T., & Sherman, S., (1993). The origin of nondisjunction in humans. Chromosomes Today 11, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauffe, H. C., (1993). Robertsonian fusions and speciation in a house mouse hybrid zone. DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Hummler, E., & Hansmann, I., (1985). Preferential nondisjunction of specific bivalents in oocytes from Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) following colchicine treatment. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 39, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hummler, E., & Hansmann, I., (1988). Pattern and frequency of nondisjunction in oocytes from the Djungarian hamster are determined by the stage of first meiotic spindle inhibition. Chromosoma 97, 224–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, P., (1992). The chromosome complement of human gametes. In: Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology 14, 47–72 (ed. Milligan, S. R.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, M. A., Thrower, D., & Wilson, L., (1992). Effects of Vinblastin, podophylotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. Implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. Journal of Cell Science 102, 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, J. C., & Brinkley, B. R., (1985). Chemical probes and possible targets for the induction of aneuploidy. In Aneuploidy-Etiology and Mechanisms (ed. Dellarco, V. L., Voytek, P. E. and Hollaender, A.), pp. 491–505. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailhes, J. B., & Marchetti, F., (1993). The relationship between chemically-induced meiotic delay and aneuploidy in mouse oocytes and zygotes. In Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy (ed. Vig, B. K.), pp. 283–296. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailhes, J. B., & Yuan, Z. P., (1987). Differential sensitivity of mouse oocytes to colchicine induced aneuploidy. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 10, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. H., Ko, E., & Rademaker, A., (1991). Distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes: comparison between human sperm and oocytes. American Journal of Medical Genetics 39, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, B. M., & Adler, I.-D., (1992). Aneuploidy induction in mouse spermatocytes. Mutagenesis 7, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pachierotti, F., Tiveron, C., & Bassani, B., (1993). Spontaneous and vinblastine-induced aneuploidy in metaphase II oocytes of Robertsonian heterozygous mice. Mutation Research 291, 261–262.Google Scholar
Pellestor, F., (1991). Frequency and distribution of aneuploidy in human female gametes. Human Genetics 86, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, P., Barros, C., & Whittingham, D. G., (1982). Preservation of hamster oocytes to assay the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 66, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redi, C. A., & Capanna, E., (1988). Robertsonian heterozygotes in the house mouse and the fate of their germ cells. In The Cytogenetics of Mammalian Autosomal Rearrangements (ed. Daniel, A.), pp. 315–359. New York: Liss.Google Scholar
Russo, A., & Pacchierotti, F., (1988). Meiotic arrest and aneuploidy induced by vinblastine in mouse oocytes. Mutation Research 202, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, J. B., (1988). Selection and Robertsonian variation in nature: The case of the common shrew. In The Cytogenetics of Mammalian Autosomal Rearrangements (ed. Daniel, A.), pp. 507–531. New York: Liss.Google Scholar
Sumner, A. T., (1972). A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75, 304–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarkowski, A. K., (1966). An air-drying method for chromosome preparations for mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 5, 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tease, C., & Fisher, G., (1986). Oocytes from young and old female mice respond differently to colchicine. Mutation Research 173, 31–34.Google Scholar
Whittingham, D. G., (1971). Culture of mouse ova. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (Suppl.) 14, 7–21.Google ScholarPubMed