Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:42:24.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parental influences on expression of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, G6pd, in the mouse; a case of imprinting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

J. Peters  and
S. T. Ball
J. Peters*
Affiliation:
MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon., OX11 0RD, U.K.
S. T. Ball
Affiliation:
MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon., OX11 0RD, U.K.
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity was measured in blood from heterozygotes for the normal allele G6pda and the low activity allele G6pda-m l Neu. In adult mice lower activity was found in G6pda/G6pda-m l Neu than in the reciprocal heterozygote G6pda-m l Neu/G6pda (the maternal allele being listed first). Thus, either the paternally derived allele was over-expressed or the maternally derived allele was under-expressed. By contrast, in younger mice the difference in G6PD activity in reciprocal crosses was less marked. The findings are interpreted in terms of differential imprinting of maternally and paternally inherited information. The explanation offered for age related differences is that, as a consequence of imprinting, either the paternal X-chromosome is preferentially reactivated, or cells in which the paternally derived allele is active are at a selective advantage, and proliferate better than those in which the maternally inherited allele is active.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 56 , Issue 2-3 , October 1990 , pp. 245 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

Albertini, R. J. & De Mars, R. (1974). Mosaicism of peripheral blood lymphocyte populations in females heterozygous for the Lesch-Nyhan mutation. Biochemical Genetics 11, 397–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. W. & Nur, U. (1964). Heterochromatic chromosomes in the coccids. Science 145, 130–136.Google Scholar
Brown, S. & Rastan, S. (1988). Age-related reactivation of an X-linked gene close to the inactivation centre in the mouse. Genetical Research 52, 151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bücher, Th. & Krietsch, W. K. G. (1988). Glycolytic enzymes in genetic research. Advances in Clinical Enzymology 6, 35–47.Google Scholar
Bücher, Th., Linke, I. M., Dünnwald, M., West, J. D. & Cattanach, B. M. (1985). Xce genotype has no impact on the effect of imprinting on X-chromosome expression in the mouse yolk sac endoderm. Genetical Research 47, 43–48.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. (1974). Position effect variegation in the mouse. Genetical Research 23, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M. (1975). Control of chromosome inactivation. Annual Review of Genetics 9, 1–18.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. & Beechey, C. V. (1990). Chromosome imprinting phenomena in mice and indications in man. Chromosomes Today (in the press).Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M., Bücher, Th. & Andrews, S. J. (1982). Location of Xce in the mouse X-chromosome and effects on PGK-1 expression. Genetical Research 40, 103–104.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M., Bücher, Th. & Andrews, S. J. (1983). PGK-1 expression in Pgk-1a/Pgk-1b feral mice associated with Xce allele substitutions. Genetical Research 41, 312–313.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M., Lyon, M. F. & Rasberry, C. (1989). Identification of the Xce allele carried with Ta. Mouse News Letter 83, 160–161.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. & Perez, J. N. (1970). Parental influence on X-autosome translocation-induced variegation in the mouse. Genetical Research 15, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M. & Williams, C. E. (1972). Evidence of non-random X chromosome activity in the mouse. Genetical Research 19, 229–240.Google Scholar
Chandra, H. S. & Brown, S. W. (1975). Chromosome imprinting and the mammalian X chromosome. Nature 253, 165–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, D. J. & Pretsch, W. (1987). Linear dose-response relationship of erythrocyte enzyme-activity mutations in offspring of ethylnitrosourea-treated mice. Mutation Research 176, 81–91.Google Scholar
Crouse, H. V. (1960). The controlling element in sex chromosome behaviour in Sciara. Genetics 45, 1429–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. & Isaacson, J. H. (1972). Sex-linked variegation modified by selection in brindled mice. Genetical Research 20, 291–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S., Isaacson, J. H. & Gauld, I. K. (1982). Non-random X inactivation in the mouse: difference of reaction to imprinting. Genetical Research 45, 95–100.Google Scholar
Forrester, L. M. & Ansell, J. D. (1985). Parental influences on X-chromosome expression. Genetical Research 45, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frels, W. I. & Chapman, V. M. (1980). Expression of the maternally derived X-chromosome in the mural trophoblast of the mouse. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 56, 179–190.Google ScholarPubMed
Frels, W. I., Rossant, J. & Chapman, V. M. (1979). Maternal X-chromosome expression in mouse chorionic ectoderm. Developmental Genetics 1, 123–132.Google Scholar
Harding, A. E. (1981). Genetic aspects of autosomal dominant late onset cerebellar ataxia. Journal of Medical Genetics 18, 436–441.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. G. & Cattanach, B. M. (1981). Controlling elements in the mouse. IV. Evidence of non-random X-inactivation. Genetical Research 37, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kindred, B. M. (1961). A maternal effect on vibrissa score due to the Tabby gene. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 14, 627–636.Google Scholar
Krietsch, W. K. G., Dünnwald, M., Linke, I. M. & Bücher, Th. (1985). Preferential expression of the maternally inherited X-chromosome phosphoglycerate kinase allele in human erythrocytes. Molecular and General Genetics 200, 497–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, A., Fosten, M. & Monk, M. (1981). Random X-chromosome inactivation in female primordial germ cells in the mouse. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 64, 251–258.Google ScholarPubMed
Migeon, B. R., Axelman, J. & Beggs, A. H. (1988). Effect of ageing on inactivation of the human X-linked HPRT locus. Nature 335, 93–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papaioannou, V. E. & West, J. D. (1981). Relationship between the parental origin of the X-chromosomes, embryonic cell lineage and X-chromosome expression in mice. Genetical Research 37, 183–197.Google Scholar
Pretsch, W., Charles, D. J. & Merkle, S. (1988). X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in Mus musculus. Biochemical Genetics 26, 89–103.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. M., Firth, C. D., Crow, T. J. & Conneally, P. M. (1988). Anticipation in Huntington's disease is transmitted through the male line but may originate in the female. Journal of Medical Genetics 25, 589–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takagi, N. (1978). Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in mice. In Genetic Mosaics and Chimeras in Mammals (ed. Russell, L. B.), pp. 341–360. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. (1975). Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extra-embryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256, 640–642.Google Scholar
Wareham, K. A., Lyon, M. F., Glenister, P. H. & Williams, E. D. (1987). Age related reactivation of an X-linked gene. Nature 327, 725–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, J. D. & Flockhart, J. H. (1989). Non-additive inheritance of glucose phosphate isomerase activity in mice heterozygous at the Gpi-1s structural locus. Genetical Research 54, 27–35.Google Scholar
West, J. D., Frels, W. I., Chapman, V. M. & Papaioannou, V. E. (1977). Preferential expression of the maternally derived X-chromosome in the mouse yolk sac. Cell 12, 873–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, J. D., Leask, R., Flockhart, J. H. & Fisher, G. (1987). High activity of an unstable form of glucose phosphate isomerase in the mouse. Biochemical Genetics 25, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, J. D., Papaioannou, V. E., Frels, W. I. & Chapman, V. M. (1978). Preferential expression of the maternally derived X-chromosome in extraembryonic tissues of the mouse. In Genetic Mosaics and Chimeras in Mammals (ed. Russell, L. B.), 361–377. New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar