Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T07:53:42.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The overall rates of dominant and recessive lethal and visible mutation induced by spermatogonial X-irradiation of mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Mary F. Lyon ,
Rita J. S. Phillips  and
A. G. Searle
Mary F. Lyon
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Radiobiological Research Unit, Harwell, Berkshire, U.K.
Rita J. S. Phillips
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Radiobiological Research Unit, Harwell, Berkshire, U.K.
A. G. Searle
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Radiobiological Research Unit, Harwell, Berkshire, U.K.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Hybrid (C3H♀ × 101♂) male mice were given two doses of 600 r. acute x-irradiation eight weeks apart and outcrossed at the end of their sterile period. Their fully fertile sons were outcrossed and daughters of these sons were backcrossed to them, in order to study the rates of induction in spermatogonia of dominant and recessive lethal and visible mutations, as well as dominant semi-sterility.

2. F1 litter-size decreased by 15·2% at birth and 15·8% at weaning age, as compared with controls. This decrease was very largely due to dominant lethality acting at about the time of embryonic implantation. There was also a highly significant increase in the incidence of heritable semi-sterility, the estimated rate of induction of reciprocal translocations being 3·3% per gamete.

3. The dominant lethality was shown to be partly a secondary consequence of induced translocation heterozygosis. The estimated overall rate of dominant lethal induction was 10·6% per gamete, with ‘primary’ dominant lethals induced at a rate of 4·0% per gamete.

4. The estimated mutation rate to dominant visible mutations was 4·6 × 10-7/gamete/r., but this was based on only two mutations in the irradiated series.

5. In the backcross generation there was again significantly more embryonic death in the irradiated series, mainly at the small mole stage and this was attributed to induced lethal mutation. The survival in the irradiated series was 96·80% of that in the controls and from this the rate of induction of recessive lethals was calculated to be 2·5 × 10-4/gamete/r. There was no evidence of the induction of lethals acting later than 14 days' gestation.

6. The estimated rate of induction of recessive visible mutations was 1·8 × 10-5/gamete/r., but the results showed heterogeneity, probably due to personal factors.

7. No significant sex-ratio differences were found.

8. The results were compared with those of specific locus and other relevant experiments. The rates of induction of recessive lethal mutations and of recessive visibles were both lower than might have been expected. On these results the mouse was only 4–5 times more sensitive than Drosophila to the mutagenic effects of radiation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 1964 , pp. 448 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, M. F. (1954). Mutation rates at specific autosomal loci in the mature and immature germ-cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 39, 409–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, S. (1960). Private communication. Mouse News Letter, 23, 33.Google Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1959). A pilot experiment with mice, using Haldane's method for detecting induced autosomal recessive lethal genes. J. Genet. 56, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. C. & Lyon, M. F. (1961). An attempt to estimate the induction by X-rays of recessive lethal and visible mutations in mice. Genet. Res. 2, 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. C., Lyon, M. F. & Phillips, R. J. S. (1955). Gene-tagged chromosome translocations in eleven stocks of mice. J. Genet. 53, 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. F. (1963). The influence of radiation on the genetic consequences of neonatal mortality in swine. Genetics Today (Geerts, S. J., ed.) 1, 78 (Abstr. XI Int. Congr. Genet.). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Cox, D. F. & Wrllham, R. L. (1962). Genetic effects of irradiation on early mortality in swine. Genetics, 47, 785–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. (1949). The estimation of mutation rates from incompletely tested gametes. J. Genet. 49, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffen, A. B. (1958). Occurrence of chromosomal aberrations in prespermatocytic cells of irradiated male mice. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 44, 691–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffen, A. B. (1964). The occurrence of chromosomal aberrations in pre-spermatocytic cells of irradiated male mice. II. Cytological studies of sterile and semi-sterile F1 individuals. In Effects of Ionizing Radiation on the Reproductive System (Carlson, W. D. and Gassner, F. X., eds.). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1952). The Genetics of the Mouse. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lüning, K. G. (1964). Studies of irradiated mouse populations. III. Accumulation of recessive lethals. Mutation Research, 1, 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, M. F. (1959). Some evidence concerning the ‘mutational load’ in inbred strains of mice. Heredity, 13, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, L. S. (1961). Mongolism. Brit. med. Butt. 17, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, R. J. S. (1961). A comparison of mutation induced by acute X and chronic gamma irradiation in mice. Brit. J. Radial. 34, 261–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purdom, C. E. & McSheehy, T. W. (1961). Radiation intensity and the induction of mutation in Drosophila. Int. J. Rod. Biol. 3, 579–586.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, L. B. (1962). Chromosome aberrations in experimental mammals. Progr. Med. Genet. 2, 230–294.Google Scholar
Russell, W. L. (1951). X-ray induced mutations in mice. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 16, 327–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, W. L. (1956). Comparison of X-ray induced mutation rates in Drosophila and mice. Amer. Nat. (Suppl.) 90, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. L. & Russell, L. B. (1959). Radiation-induced genetic damage in mice. Progr. Nucl. Energy, series VI, 2, 179–188.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, W. L., Russell, L. B. & Kelly, E. M. (1958). Radiation dose rate and mutation frequency. Science, 128, 1546–1550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, W. L., Russell, L. B. & Kelly, E. M. (1959). Dependence of mutation rate on radiation intensity. Pp. 311–320 of Immediate and Low Level Effects of Ionizing Radiation. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Sarvella, P. A. & Russell, L. B. (1956). Steel, a new dominant gene in the house mouse. J. Hered. 47, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1964). Genetic effects of spermatogonial x-irradiation on productivity of F1 female mice. Mutation Research, 1, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, G. D. (1941). Biology of the Laboratory Mouse. New York: Blakiston.Google Scholar
Snell, G. D., Bodemann, E. & Hollander, W. (1934). A translocation in the house mouse and its effect on development. J. exp. Zool. 67, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welshons, W. J., Gibson, B. H. & Scandlyn, B. J. (1962). Slide processing for the examination of male mammalian meiotic chromosomes. Stain Tech. 37, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ytterborn, K. H. (1962). X-ray sensitivity of spermatogonia and spermatozoa in Drosophilamelanogaster. Nature, Lond., 194, 797–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar