Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:47:42.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oral morphogenesis during asexual reproduction in Paramecium tetraurelia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Warren R. Jones
Warren R. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47401, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Oral morphogenesis in stock 51 of Paramecium tetraurelia was investigated using the techniques of Chatton-Lwoff and protargol silver impregnation. During the stomatogenesis accompanying divisional morphogenesis a new oral anlage field and endoral kinety are formed and persist throughout the interfission period in both the proter and the opisthe. This previously overlooked fact is important for understanding the developmental origins and significance of the endoral kinety and the oral anlage field. Previously, the kinetosomes constituting the oral anlage field were thought to be formed just prior to the onset of stomatogenesis, being in some way derived from the kinetosomes of the endoral kinety. The demonstration of a permanent anlage field as an integral component of the oral assemblage suggests that the earliest stages of stomatogenesis might best be viewed as temporally controlled surfacing and/or ciliation of pre-existing kinetosomes rather than their de novo synthesis. The endoral kinety would thus have no contributory role in the formation of the anlage field used in the immediately ensuing stomatogenesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 187 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R. D. (1974). Food vacuole membrane growth with microtubule-associated membrane transport in Paramecium. Journal of Cell Biology 63, 904–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatton, É. & Lwoff, A. (1930). Impregnation par diffusion argentique de l'inraciliature des Ciliés marins et d'eau douce, après fixation cytologique et sans dessiccation. Comptes Rendues de la Société Biologique 104, 834–836.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Lwoff, A. (1935). La constitution primitive de la strie ciliare des Infusoires. La desmodexie. Comptes Rendues de la Société Biologique 118, 1068–1072.Google Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1955). Proposed uniformity in naming ‘mouth parts’ in ciliates. Journal of Protozoology 2 (suppl.), 12.Google Scholar
Dippell, R. V. (1962). The site of silver impregnation in Paramecium aurelia. Journal of Protozoology 9 (suppl.), 24.Google Scholar
Dippell, R. V. (1968). The development of basal bodies in Paramecium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 61, 461–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dragesco, J. (1962). L'orientation actuelle, de la systématiques des Ciliés et la technique d'imprégnation au protéinate d'argent. Bulletin de Microscopie Appliqué 2 (2); 47–58.Google Scholar
Ehret, C. F. & Powers, E. L. (1959). The cell surface of Paramecium. International Review of Cytology 8, 97–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehret, C. F. & de Haller, G. (1963). Origin, development and maturation of organelles and organelle systems of the cell surface of Paramecium. Journal of Ultrastructure Research (Suppl.) 6, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehret, C. F. & McArdle, E. W. (1974). The structure of Paramecium as viewed from its constituent levels of organization In Paramecium: A Current Survey (ed. von Wagtendonk, W. J.), pp. 263–338. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Frankel, J. (1974). Positional information in unicellular organisms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 47, 439–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelei, J. von (1934). Der feinere Bau des Cytopharynx von Paramecium und seiner systematische Bedeutung. Archiv für Protistenkunde 6 (2), 13–31.Google Scholar
Gillies, C. & Hanson, E. D. (1968). Morphogenesis of Paramecium trichium. Acta Protistologica 6 (2), 14–38.Google Scholar
Hanson, E. D. (1955). Inheritance and regeneration of cytoplasmic damage in Paramecium aurelia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 41, 783–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, E. D. (1962). Morphogenesis and regeneration of oral structure in Paramecium aurelia. An analysis of intra-cellular development. Journal of Experimental Zoology 150, 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, E. D., Gillies, C. & Kaneda, M. (1969). Oral structure development and nuclear behavior during conjugation in Paramecium aurelia. Journal of Protozoology 16 (1), 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, E. D. & Ungerleider, R. M. (1974). The formation of the feeding organelle in Paramecium aurelia. Journal of Experimental Zoology 185, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertwig, R. (1889). Über die Conjugation der Infusorien. Abhandlungen der K. bayer. Akademie der Wissenschaft, II Cl. Xvii, Bd I. Abth., 150–233.Google Scholar
Kaneda, M. & Hanson, E. D. (1974). Growth patterns and morphogenetic events in the cell cycle of Paramecium aurelia. In Paramecium: A Current Survey (ed. van Wagtendonk, W. J.), pp. 219–262. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Millecchia, L. L. & Rudzinska, M. A. (1972). The permanence of the infraciliature in suctoria: An electron microscopic study of pattern formation in Tokophyra infusionem. Journal of Protozoology 19 (3), 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, E. D. (1960). The buccal organelles in Paramecium aurelia during fission and conjugation with special reference to the kinetosomes. Journal of Protozoology 7 (3), 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roque, M. (1956 a). L'évolution de la ciliature buccale pendant l'autogamie et la conjugaison chez Paramecium aurelia. Comptes Rendues des Séances de l'académie des Sciences 242, 2592–2595.Google Scholar
Roque, M. (1956 b). La stomatogénèse pendant l'autogamie, la conjugaison et la division chez Paramecium aurelia. Comptes Rendues des Séances de l'académie des Sciences 243, 1564–1565.Google Scholar
Roque, M. (1961). Recherches sur les infusoires ciliés: Les hyménostomes péneculiens. Bulletin Biologique de la France et de la Belgique 45 (3), 431–517.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1963). Does performed structure play an essential role in cell heredity. In Nature of Biological Diversity (ed. Arlen, J. M.), pp. 165–221. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1970). Methods in Paramecium research. In Methods in Cell Physiology, vol. 4 (ed. Prescott, D.), pp. 241–339. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1974). Ciliate morphogenesis and its bearing on general cellular morphogenesis. In Actualités Protozoologiques, vol. 1 (ed. de Purjtorac, P. and Grain, J.), pp. 337–355.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1975). The Paramecium aurelia complex of fourteen sibling species. Transactions of the American Microscopial Society 94 (2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, L. (1969). Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 25, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, L. (1971). Positional information and pattern formation. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 6, 183–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusa, A. (1957). The morphology and morphogenesis of the buccal organelles in Paramecium with particular reference to their systematic significance. Journal of Protozoology 4(2), 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar