Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:12:13.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the theory of artificial selection in finite populations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

W. G. Hill
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50010, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of selection on individual performance for a quantitative trait is studied theoretically for populations of finite size. The trait is assumed to be affected by environmental error and by segregation at a single locus. Exact formulae are derived to predict the change in gene frequency at this locus, initially by finding the probability distribution of the numbers of each genotype selected from a finite population of specified genotypic composition. Assuming that there is random mating and no natural selection the results are extended to describe repeated cycles of artificial selection for a monecious population. The formulae are evaluated numerically for the case of normally distributed environmental errors.

Using numerical examples comparisons are made between the exact values for the predicted change in gene frequency with values obtained using approximate, but simpler, methods. Unless the gene has a large effect (α) on the quantitative trait, relative to the standard deviation of the environmental errors, the agreement between exact and approximate methods is satisfactory for most predictive purposes. The chance of fixation after repeated generations of selection is also evaluated using the exact method, and by means of a diffusion approximation and simple transition probability matrix methods. Except for very small values of population size (N) and large α the results from the diffusion equation agree closely with those from the exact method. Similar results are found from tests made of the prediction from the diffusion equation that the limit is only a function of Nα for a given intensity of selection and initial frequency, and that the rate of advance in gene frequency is proportional to 1/N for the same set of parameters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 143 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, A. C. (1926). On Bernoulli's numerical solution of algebraic equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 46, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, J. S. & Robertson, A. (1964). The effect of initial reverse selection upon total selection response. Genet. Res. 5, 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curnow, R. N. & Baker, L. H. (1968). The effect of repeated cycles of selection and regeneration, in populations of finite size. Genet. Res. 11, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, E. R. (1955). Genetic models in relation to animal breeding problems. Biometrika 11, 525–536.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1963). Numerical results and diffusion approximation in a genetic process. Biometrika 50, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffing, B. (1960), Theoretical consequences of truncation selection based on the individual phenotype. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 13, 307–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1931). A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. VII. Selection intensity as a function of mortality rate. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 27, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1966). The effect of linkage on the limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8, 269–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1968). The effects of inbreeding at loci with heterozygote advantage. Genetica 60 (in Press).Google ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1957). Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Ann. Math. Statist. 28, 882–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. (1958). On the change of population fitness by natural selection. Heredity 12, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. (1962). On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kojima, K. (1961). Effects of dominance and size of population on response to mass selection. Genet. Res. 2, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1965). The response to artificial selection due to autosomal genes of large effect. I. Changes in gene frequency at an additive locus. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 585–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latter, B. D. H. (1966). The interaction between effective population size and linkage intensity under artificial selection. Genet. Res. 7, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, D. J. (1969). A comparison of two methods for predicting changes in the distribution of gene frequency when selection is applied repeatedly to a finite population. Genet. Res. 13, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 153, 234–249.Google Scholar
Teichroew, D. (1956). Tables of expected values of order statistics and products of order statistics from samples of size 20 and less from the normal distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 27, 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar