Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:41:38.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional studies with Scaleless chickens: I. The Sulphur-Containing Amino Acids*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

U. K. Abbott ,
V. S. Asmundson  and
K. R. Shortridge
U. K. Abbott
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Husbandry, University of California, Davis, California
V. S. Asmundson
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Husbandry, University of California, Davis, California
K. R. Shortridge
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Husbandry, University of California, Davis, California
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Young birds homozygous for the recessive gene, sc, had a significantly lower requirement than their normally feathered siblings for the sulphur-containing amino-acids, methionine and cystine. When fed a synthetic diet lacking in methionine, feathered birds showed the expected abrupt decrease in weight gain while Scaleless birds grew at a rate equivalent to feathered birds receiving the full diet. Scaleless birds receiving the full diet exceeded feathered birds in weight gain during the first part of the feeding trial but they required more food per gram of gain. Between Scaleless groups those fed the deficient diet dropped behind those on full diet in gain after 3 weeks but even after 6 weeks these did not differ in other respects. On the other hand among normal birds those receiving the deficient diet were higher in heat output and had relatively larger thyroid and adrenal glands than those receiving the full diet.

Differences between the two phenotypes are accounted for by (1) the difference in nutritive requirements determined by feather growth, and (2) the resultant differences in heat loss which accounted for the increase in heat output, packed cell volume and heart, thyroid and adrenal gland size of Scaleless birds.

The use of mutants such as Scaleless in studies concerned with requirements for specific physiological or growth purposes is suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1962 , pp. 181 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, U. K. (1958). Selection for viability in Scaleless chickens. Proc. 11th Pacific Chicken and Turkey Breeders Roundtable, 27–32c.Google Scholar
Abbott, U. K. & Asmundson, V. S. (1957). Scaleless, an inherited ectodermal defect in the domestic fowl. J. Hered. 48, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, U. K. & Asmundson, V. S. (1958). Further studies with Scaleless—An inherited ectodermal defect in the fowl. II. Heat production and respiratory quotient. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Genet. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Abplanalp, H. (1962). The modification of selection limits in a chicken population. Genet. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
Almquist, H. J. (1952). Amino acid requirements of chickens and turkeys. A review. Poult. Sci. 31, 966–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmundson, V. S. & Abbott, U. K. (1958). Further studies with Scaleless—An inherited ectodermal defect in the fowl. III. Growth. Poult. Sci. 37, 1182.Google Scholar
Benedict, F. G., Landauer, W. & Fox, E. L. (1932). The physiology of normal and Frizzle fowl, with special reference to the basal metabolism. Storrs Agric. Exptl. Stat. Bull. 177, 1–101.Google Scholar
Block, R. J. & Bolling, D. (1951). The Amino Acid Composition of Proteins and Foods. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Boas, E. P. & Landauer, W. (1934). The effect of elevated metabolism on the heart of Frizzle fowl. II Increased ratio of heart to body weight. Amer. J. med. Sci. 188, 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, J. P. (1938–1939). Studies on plumage in the male brown Leghorn fowl. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb. 59, 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. J., Norris, L. C. & Heuser, G. F. (1938). Further evidence of the amount of vitamin G required for reproduction in poultry. Poult. Sci. 17, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Selection of mice for growth on high and low planes of nutrition. Genet.Res. 1, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, A. W. (1927). The ‘hackleless’ fowl. Proc. R. phys. Soc. Edinb. 21, 123–129.Google Scholar
Gregersen, M. I. (1944). A practical method for the determination of blood volume with the dye T-1824. J. Lab. clin. Med. 29, 1266–1286.Google Scholar
Gregersen, M. I. & Rawson, R. A. (1959). Blood volume. Physiol. Rev. 39, 307–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, C. E. & Hutt, F. B. (1952). Breed resistance to nutritional encephalomalacia in the fowl. Poult. Sci. 31, 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, C. E. & Hutt, F. B. (1956). Genetic variation in efficiency of thiamine utilization by the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 35, 1223–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutt, F. B. (1949). Genetics of the Fowl. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Hutt, F. B. & Sturkie, P. D. (1938). The genetics of the fowl. IX. Naked, a new sex-liked mutation. J. Hered. 29, 370–379.Google Scholar
Kalter, H. (1959). Congenital malformations induced by riboflavin deficiency in strains of inbred mice. Pediatrics, 23, 222–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleiber, M. (1940). A respiration apparatus for serial work with small animals, particularly rats. Univ. Calif. Pub. Physiol. 8, 207–220.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1947). Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol. Rev. 27, 511–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamoreux, W. F. & Hutt, F. B. (1948). Genetic resistance to deficiency of riboflavin in the chick. Poult. Sci. 27, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, W. & Aberle, S. D. (1935). Studies on the endocrine glands of Frizzle fowl. Amer. J. Anat. 57, 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, W. & David, L. T. (1933). Elevated metabolism, blood cells, and hemoglobin content of the blood in the Frizzle fowl. Folia haemat., Lpz., 50, 1–14.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1954). Genetic Homeostasis. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M. W. (1957). Methionine supplements in chicken diets. II. A breed difference in growth response to DL-methionine. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, M. W. (1958). Methionine supplements in chicken diets. III. The biochemical difference in sulphur-amino acid metabolism between White Leghorns and Australorps. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, W. C. (1938). The nutritive significance of the amino acids. Physiol. Rev. 18, 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahyun, M. (1948) (Ed.). Proteins and Amino Acids in Nutrition. New York: Reinhold Publ. Corp.Google Scholar
Sturkie, P. D. (1942). A new type of austosomal nakedness in the domestic fowl. J. Hered. 33, 202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturkie, P. D. (1950). Further studies of autosomal nakedness in the domestic fowl. Amer. Nat. 84, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. W. (1949). (Ed.) Fertility and Hatchability of Chicken and Turkey Eggs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1937). The design and analysis of factorial experiments. Imp. Bur. Soil Sci. Tech. Comm. 35.Google Scholar