Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:45:29.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nature of the leucine requirement of the barley mutant Xan-b61

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

J. B. Land  and
G. Norton
J. B. Land
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biochemistry and Nutrition, university of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire
G. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biochemistry and Nutrition, university of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Contrary to previous reports, evidence has been presented which indicates that Xan-b61, a Xantha mutant of barley, does not have an auxotrophic requirement for leucine. It has been shown that this mutant, when grown under appropriate conditions in the absence of leucine, will synthesize leucine and will continue to grow for an extended period of time.

Type
Short Papers
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 135 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

DeKock, P. C. & Morrison, R. I. (1958). Metabolism of chlorotic leaves. I. Amino acids. Biochem. J. 70, 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, O. E. (1967). Biochemical genetics of higher plants. A. Rev. Genet. 1, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Wettstein, D. & Eriksson, G. (1963). The genetics of chloroplasts. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Genet., The Hague, 591–612.Google Scholar
Walles, B. (1963). Macromolecular physiology of plastids. IV. On amino acid requirements of lethal chloroplast mutants in barley. Hereditas 50, 315–344.Google Scholar
Walles, B. (1968). Biochemical mutants affected in chloroplast morphology. Hereditas 59, 346–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar