Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:16:53.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse I. The Limits Attained in Earlier Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

R. C. Roberts
R. C. Roberts
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Genetics, Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The results of some selection experiments for body weight in the mouse, conducted in the past in this laboratory, have been examined from the point of view of the limits ultimately reached.

2. The limits that are apparently attained do not necessarily remain stable over prolonged periods of time; two large lines showed marked decreases despite continued selection for high body weight.

3. Selection for high body weight reached a limit in the region of 30 g. at 6 weeks of age; small mice reached their limit at around 12 g.

4. The time taken to reach the limit may vary from ten to thirty generations, even for this one trait.

5. The total response for unidirectional selection was between two and six times the phenotypic standard deviation, or three to twelve times the additive genetic standard deviation.

6. Consideration of the half-life of the selection responses excluded the likelihood of the chance fixation of alleles unfavourable to the direction of selection.

7. The loci contributing to the response could each have an effect amounting to anything from one-half to one phenotypic standard deviation in the base population.

8. This indicated that up to twenty loci had contributed to the response.

9. The intensity of selection practised was close to the optimum for obtaining the maximum total response.

10. The rule of parsimony would indicate the exhaustion of the additive genetic variance as an adequate explanation of the limits attained.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , December 1966 , pp. 347 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Dempster, E. R. (1955). Genetic models in relation to animal breeding problems. Biometrics, 11, 535–536.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1953). Selection for large and small size in mice. J. Genet. 51, 470–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1955). Patterns of response in selection experiments with mice. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 20, 178–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. (1960 a). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd, Ltd.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960 b). Selection of mice for growth on high and low planes of nutrition Genet. Res. 1, 91–113.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. & King, J. W. B. (1953). A study of selection limits in the mouse. J. Genet. 51, 561–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, H. D. (1938). A study of the inheritance of body weight in the albino mouse by selection. J. Hered. 29, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, H.D. (1941). Progress report on possibilities in progeny-test breeding. Science, N.Y. 94, 442–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G. (1965). Studies on artificial selection. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1966). The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res, 8, 269–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1957). Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Ann. math. Statist. 28, 882–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. W. B. (1950). Pygmy, a dwarfing gene in the house mouse. J. Hered. 41, 249–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, J. W. (1944). Genetics of body size and related characters. I. Selecting small and large races of the laboratory mouse. Am. Nat. 78, 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, J. W. (1949). Selection for small and large body size in the house mouse. Genetics, 34, 194–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, J. A. (1960). Reciprocal recurrent selection for body size in the mouse. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. B. Soc. B, 153, 234–249.Google Scholar