Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:12:19.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of selection, linkage and drift in the dynamics of polygenic characters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Frédéric Hospital  and
Claude Chevalet
Frédéric Hospital*
Affiliation:
Station de Génétique Végétale, INRA/UPS/INA-PG, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France
Claude Chevalet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, INRA, BP27, 31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France
*
*Frédéric Hospital, Station de Génétique Vététale, INRA/UPS/INA-PG, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France. Phone: (33) (1) 69 33 23 36; Fax: (33) (1) 69 33 23 40; E-mail: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the dynamics under directional truncation selection of the genetic variability of a quantitative character controlled by a finite number of possibly linked loci with additive effects. After the first generation of selection, the build-up of linkage disequilibria (Bulmer effect) is analytically demonstrated from a genetical point of view in an infinite population. In the following generations, the dynamics of the system in a finite population are predicted using analytic recurrences under a multi-normal approximation, and computer simulations. The effects of recombination on the dynamics of linkage disequilibria induced by selection and drift, and the consequences for the additive genetic variance are then analysed and discussed from the simulation results. Compared to the rapid exploitation of genetic variability promoted by high recombination rates, low recombination rates promote an early storage of genetic variability in repulsion associations of alleles and a possible late release of genetic variance in the population, so that the variability of the character may be maintained over a longer period of time. In some cases, favourable recombination events in tightly linked systems induce an increase of the additive variance of the character, which may explain some results observed in long-term selection experiments. Our results emphasize that the joint effects of selection, linkage and drift must notbe neglected in theoretical quantitative genetics, and require further investigation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 77 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. (1987). Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genetical Research 23, 337–370.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1971). The effect of selection on genetic variability. American Naturalist 105, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Chevalet, C. (1988). Control of genetic drift in selected populations. In Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Quantitative Genetics (ed. Weir, B., Eisen, E., Goodman, M. and Namkoong, G.), pp. 379–394.Google Scholar
Chevalet, C. (1994). An approximate theory of selection assuming a finite number of quantitative trait loci. Genetics Selection Evolution 26, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, W. J. & Lambert, R. J. (1992). Ninety generations of selection for oil and protein in maize. Maydica 37, 81–87.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1977). Multivariate normal genetic models with a finite number of loci. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics (ed. Pollak, E., Kempthorne, O. and Barley, T. B. Jr), pp. 227–246. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives under the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52, 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 1st Ed.Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffing, B. (1960). Theoretical consequences of truncation selection based on the individual phenotype. Australian Journal of Biological Science 15, 307–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hospital, F. & Chevalet, C. (1993). Effect of population size and linkage on optimal selection intensity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 775–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keightley, P. D. & Hill, W. G. (1987). Directional selection and variation in finite populations. Genetics 117, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1976). The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genetical Research 28, 221–235.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1964 a). The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations. Heterotic models. Genetics 49, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1964 b). The interaction of selection and linkage. II. Optimum models. Genetics 50, 757–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1988). On measures of gametic disequilibrium. Genetics 120, 849–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. & Kojima, K. (1960). The evolutionary dynamics of complex polymorphisms. Evolution 14, 458–472.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1945). Animal Breeding Plans, 2nd Ed.Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Mather, K. (1941). Variation and selection of polygenic characters. Journal of Genetics 41, 159–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1896). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity and panmixia. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London Series A 187, 253–318.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1903). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XL On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlations of organs. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London Series A 200, 1–66.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1970). Some optimal problems in individual selection. Theoretical Population Biology 1, 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1977). Artificial selection with a large number of linked loci. (ed. Pollak, E., Kempthorne, O. and Barley, T. B. Jr), In Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics pp. 307–322. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. & Hill, W. G. (1983). Population and quantitative genetics of many linked loci in finite populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 219, 253–264.Google Scholar
Scharloo, W. (1987). Constraints in selection response. In Genetic Constraints on Adaptative Evolution (ed. Loeschcke, V.), pp. 125–140. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M. & Barton, N. (1990). Dynamics of polygenic characters under selection. Theoretical Population Biology 38, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M. & Barton, N. H. (1994). Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: What, me normal? Genetics 138, 913–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed