Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:09:50.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insecticide resistance genes confer a predation cost on mosquitoes, Culex pipiens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2004

C. BERTICAT
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR CNRS 5554), C.C. 065, Université de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France
O. DURON
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR CNRS 5554), C.C. 065, Université de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France
D. HEYSE
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR CNRS 5554), C.C. 065, Université de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France
M. RAYMOND
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR CNRS 5554), C.C. 065, Université de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Newly occurring adaptive genes, such as those providing insecticide resistance, display a fitness cost which is poorly understood. In order to detect subtle behavioural changes induced by the presence of resistance genes, we used natural predators and compared their differential predation on susceptible and resistant Culex pipiens mosquitoes, using strains with a similar genetic background. Resistance genes were either coding an overproduced detoxifying esterase (locus Ester), or an insensitive target (locus ace-1). Differential predation was measured between susceptible and resistant individuals, as well as among resistant mosquitoes. A backswimmer, a water measurer, a water boatman and a predaceous diving beetle were used as larval predators, and a pholcid spider as adult predator. Overall, the presence of a resistance gene increased the probability of predation: all resistance genes displayed predation costs relative to susceptible ones, at either the larval or adult stage, or both. Interestingly, predation preferences among the susceptible and the resistance genes were not ranked uniformly. Possible explanations for these results are given, and we suggest that predators, which are designed by natural selection to detect specific behavioural phenotypes, are useful tools to explore non-obvious differences between two classes of individuals, for example when they differ by the presence or absence of one recent gene, such as insecticide resistance genes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press