Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:47:29.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification of a male determinant on the X chromosome of housefly (Musca domestica L.) populations in South-East England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

I. Denholm ,
M. G. Franco ,
P. G. Rubini  and
M. Vecchi
I. Denholm
Affiliation:
Department of Insecticides and Fungicides, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ, England
M. G. Franco
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia Animale, University of Pavia, P. Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy
P. G. Rubini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia Animale, University of Pavia, P. Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy
M. Vecchi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia Animale, University of Pavia, P. Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Houseflies collected from eight pig-breeding farms were used to investigate the nature of sex determinants in fly populations of South-East England. Earlier observations had shown that their sex determination mechanism was not of the standard (XX females, XY males) type.

Most flies of both sexes were XX; the male determining Y chromosome of standard populations was rare. Test-crosses to females of standard multimarked strains and crosses using aneuploid (OX) flies identified two dominant male determinants, one on autosome 3 (M III) and another on the X chromosome (Xm), and provided the first demonstration in this species of an active involvement of the X chromosome in sex determination. A small secondary constriction on X appeared to indicate reliably the presence of Xm. Most individuals in field populations were Xm homozygotes, implying the presence of an unlocated female determinant F,† epistatic to Xm and M III.

M III was less common and differed in frequency between samples. Its increased frequency in a strain selected in the laboratory with the pyrethroid insecticide permethrin might be due either to genetic drift, or to linkage between M III and a gene on autosome 3 that confers resistance to pyrethroids in houseflies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 311 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Franco, M. G., Rubini, P. G. & Vecchi, M. (1982). Sex-determinants and their distribution in various populations of Musca domestica L. of Western Europe. Genetical Research 40, 279–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiroyoshi, T. (1977). Some new mutants and revised linkage maps of the housefly, Musca domestica L. Japanese Journal of Genetics 52, 275–288.Google Scholar
Hiroyoshi, T. (1980). Formal genetics of the housefly in relation to insecticide resistance. Paper presented at the 16th International Congress of Entomology, Kyoto, 1980. Abstract in Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Entomology 1, 397.Google Scholar
Hiroyoshi, T. & Fukumori, Y. (1977). On the IIIm-type houseflies frequently appeared in Japan. Japanese Journal of Genetics 52, 443 (Abstract in Japanese).Google Scholar
Hiroyoshi, T. & Fukumori, Y. (1978). On the sex-determination in wild populations of the housefly. Japanese Journal of Genetics 53, 420–421. (Abstract in Japanese.)Google Scholar
Hiroyoshi, T. & Inoue, H. (1979). On the lm-chromosome of the housefly. Japanese Journal of Genetics 54, 434. (Abstract in Japanese.)Google Scholar
Inoue, H. & Hiroyoshi, T. (1982). A male-determining factor on autosome 1 and occurrence of male-recombination in the housefly, Musca domestica L. Japanese Journal of Genetics 57, 221–229.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. W. (1961). Inheritance of DDT-resistance involving the Y-chromosome in the housefly (Musca domestica L.). Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 14, 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, R. W. (1970). Inheritance of DDT resistance in a laboratory colony of the housefly, Musca domestica. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23, 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimbas, C. B. & Tsakas, S. (1971). The genetics of Dacus oleae. V. Changes of esterase polymorphism in a natural population following insecticide control-selection or drift? Evolution 25, 454–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, I. C., Overland, D. E., Leopold, R. A., Degrugillier, M. E., Morgan, P. B. & Hofmann, H. C. (1975). Genetics of house flies. Variability studies with North Dakota, Texas, and Florida populations. Journal of Heredity 66, 137–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, I. C., Evenson, P., Nickel, C. A. & Johnson, O. A. (1978). House fly genetics: isolation of a female determining factor on chromosome 4. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 71, 692–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, R. (1962). Observations on intraspecific differentiation, genetic variability, sex-limited inheritance, DDT- resistance and aspects of sexual behaviour in Musca domestica L. Symposia Genetica et Biologica Italica 9, 312–327.Google Scholar
Milani, R. (1967). The genetics of Musca domestica and of other muscoid flies. In Genetics of Insect Vectors of Disease (ed. Wright, J. W. and Pal, R.), pp. 315–369. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rubini, P. G. (1967). Ulteriori osservazioni sui determinanti sessuali di Musca domestica L. Genetica Agraria 21, 363–384.Google Scholar
Rubini, P. G., Franco, M. G. & Vanossi, Este S. (1972). Polymorphisms for heterochromosomes and atosomal sex-determinants in Musca domestica L. Atti IX Congresso Italiano Entomologia, 341–352.Google Scholar
Rubini, P. G., Vecchi, M. & Franco, M. G. (1980). Mitotic recombination in Musca domestica L. and its influence on mosaicism, gynandromorphism and recombination in males. Genetical Research 35, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupes, V. & Pinterova, T. (1975). Genetic analysis of resistance to DDT, methoxychlor and fenotrothion in two strains of housefly (Musca domestica). Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 18, 480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawicki, R. M., Farnham, A. W., Denholm, I. & O'Dell, K. (1981). Housefly resistance to pyrethroids in the vicinity of Harpenden. Proceedings 1981 British Crop Protection Conference, vol. 2, 609–616.Google Scholar
Tsukamoto, M., Shono, T. & Horio, M. (1980). Autosomal sex-determining system of the housefly: discovery of the first-chromosomal male factor in Kitakyushu, Japan. Journal of University of Occupational and Environmental Health 2, 235–252.Google Scholar