Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:54:56.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The HSR on chromosome 1 of the house mouse, Mus domesticus: distribution and frequency in Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Roland Hübner ,
Tiziano Maddalena ,
Jeremy B. Searle  and
Peter Vogel
Roland Hübner*
Affiliation:
Institut de zoologie et d'écologie animate (IZEA), Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Tiziano Maddalena
Affiliation:
Institut de zoologie et d'écologie animate (IZEA), Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Jeremy B. Searle
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Peter Vogel
Affiliation:
Institut de zoologie et d'écologie animate (IZEA), Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
*
* Present address: Lab. Biochimie (B6), Institut de Chimie, Université de Liège, Sart-Tilman, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 357 house mice (Mus domesticus) from 83 localities uniformly distributed throughout Switzerland were screened for the presence of a homogenously staining region (HSR) on chromosome 1. Altogether 47 mice from 11 localities were HSR/ + or HSR/HSR. One sample of 11 individuals all had an HSR/HSR karyotype. Almost all mice with the variant were collected from the Rhone valley (HSR frequency: 61%) and Val Bregaglia (HSR frequency: 81%). For samples from most of thearea of Switzerland, the HSR was absent. There was no strong association between the geographic distribution of the HSR and the areas of occurrence of metacentrics. However, at Chiggiogna the HSR was found on Rb (1·3). Possible explanations for the HSR polymorphism are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 107 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Adolph, S. (1982). Chromosomenvariationen in Mus musculus domesticus, Rutty, aus Süddeutschland. Dissertation, Universität Tübingen, 86p.Google Scholar
Adolph, S. & Klein, J. (1981). Robertsonian variation in Mus musculus from central Europe, Spain and Scotland. Journal of Heredity 72, 219–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agulnik, S. I., Agulnik, A. I. & Ruvinsky, A. O. (1990 a). Meiotic drive in female mice heterozygous for the HSR inserts on chromosome 1. Genetical Research 55, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agulnik, S. I., Borodin, P. M., Gorlov, I. P., Ladygina, T. Yu. & Pack, S. D. (1990 b). The origin of a double insertion of homogeneously staining regions in the house mouse (Mus musculus musculus). Heredity 65, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agulnik, S. I., Sabantsev, I. D., Orlova, G. V. & Ruvinsky, A. O. (1993 a). Meiotic drive on aberrant chromosome 1 in the mouse is determined by a linked distorter. Genetical Research 61, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agulnik, S. I., Sabantsev, I. D. & Ruvinsky, A. O. (1993 b). Effect of sperm genotype on chromatid segregation in female mice heterozygous for aberrant chromosome 1. Genetical Research 61, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agulnik, S., Adolph, S., Winking, H. & Traut, W. (1993 c). Zoogeography of the chromosome 1 HSR in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Hereditas 119, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auffray, J.-C., Vanlerberghe, F. & Britton-Davidian, J. (1990). The house mouse progression in Eurasia: a palaeontological and archaeozoological approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 41, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauchau, V., Smets, S., Viroux, M.-C., Nootens, D. & de Caritat, A.-K. (1989). Robertsonian translocations in free-living populations of the house mouse in Belgium. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 41, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boursot, P., Dod, B., Dallas, J. & Bonhomme, F. (1993). Historical aspects of the radiation of the house mouse: consequences of genomic coadaptation and the formation of hybrid zones. Abstracts, Fourth Congress of the European Society of Evolutionary Biology, Montpellier, France p. 52.Google Scholar
Eckert, W. A., Plass, C., Weith, A., Traut, W. & Winking, H. (1991). Transcripts from amplified sequences of an inherited homogeneously staining region in chromosome1 of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Molecular and Cellular Biology 11, 2229–2235.Google Scholar
Evans, E. P. (1986). The karyotyping of mouse cells. In Manipulating the Mouse Embryo. A Laboratory Manual (ed. Hogan, B., Constatini, F. and Lacy, E.), pp. 221–225. Cold Spring Harbor: CSH Laboratory.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E. (1966). The use of chromosome markers. In Tissue Grafting and Radiation (ed. Micklem, H. S. and Loutit, J. F.), pp. 197–206. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giménez, M. D. & Bidau, C. J. (1993). Polimorfismos de heterocromatina constitutiva en Mus musculus domesticus. Abstracts, 24th Congreso Argentino de Genetica, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina p. 119.Google Scholar
Gropp, A., Winking, H., Zech, L. & Muller, H. J. (1972). Robertsonian chromosomal variation and identification of metacentric chromosomes in feral mice. Chromosoma 30, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropp, A., Winking, H., Redi, C., Capanna, E., Britton-Davidian, J. & Noack, G. (1982). Robertsonian karyotype variation in wild house mice from Rhaeto-Lombardia. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 34, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hübner, R. (1992). Chromosomal and biochemical variation in wild mice from Switzerland: relevance for models of chromosomal evolution in European house mice. D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 177p.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plass, C., Hellwig, T., Traut, W. & Winking, H. (1992). Evolution of a B2 tagged sequence from a long-range repeat family in the genus Mus. Mammalian Genome 3, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomiankowski, A. & Hurst, L. D. (1993). Siberian mice upset Mendel. Nature 363, 396–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purmann, L., Plass, C., Grüneberg, H., Winking, H. & Traut, W. (1992). A long-range repeat cluster in chromosome 1 of the house mouse, Mus musculus, and its relation to a germline homogeneously staining region. Genomics 12, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabantsev, I., Spitsin, O., Agulnik, S. & Ruvinsky, A. (1993). Population dynamics of aberrant chromosome 1 in mice. Heredity 70, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saïd, K., Jacquart, T., Montgelard, C., Sonjaya, H., Helal, A. N. & Britton-Davidian, J. (1986). Robertsonian house mouse populations in Tunisia: karyotypical and biochemical study. Genetica 68, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabright, M. (1971). A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet ii, 971–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. B. (1991). A hybrid zone comprising staggered chromosomal dines in the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 246, 47–52.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B., Navarro, Y. N. & Ganem, G. (1993). Further studies of a staggered hybrid zone in Mus musculus domesticus (the house mouse). Heredity 71, 523–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, A. T. (1972). A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75, 304–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traut, W., Winking, H. & Adolph, S. (1984). An extra segment in chromosome 1 of wild Mus musculus: a C-band positive homogeneously staining region. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 38, 290–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volobouev, V. T. (1983). Les types de polymorphisme chromosomique et rôle évolutif chez les mammiferes (Insectivora, Rodentia et Carnivora). Thèse de doctorat d'état, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, 205p.Google Scholar
Winking, H., Bostelmann, H. & Fredga, K. (1991 a). Incidence of double-band HSRs in chromosome 1 of the house mouse, Mus musculus musculus, from Oland (Sweden): a population study. Hereditas 114, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winking, H., Weigh, A., Boldyreff, B., Moriwaki, K., Fredga, K. & Traut, W. (1991 b). Polymorphic HSRs in chromosome 1 of the two semispecies Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus have a common origin in an ancestral population. Chromosoma 100, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zima, J., Gaichenko, V. A., Macholan, M., Radjabli, S. I., Sablina, O. V. & Wojcik, J. (1990). Are Robertsonian variations a frequent phenomenon in mouse populations in Eurasia? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 41, 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar