Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T19:26:09.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heritable variation and heterozygosity under a balance between mutations and stabilizing selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Montgomery Slatkin
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A model of the balance between mutations and stabilizing selection affecting a quantitative character is developed and analysed. This model is essentially a discretized version of the continuum-of-alleles models analysed previously by Kimura, Lande, Turelli and others, and is formally similar to the stepwise mutation models used to interpret electrophoretic data. The complete model cannot be solved even for a haploid species, but there are useful approximations for most parameter values of interest. The ‘house-of-cards’ approximation can be used when selection is strong relative to mutation, and a normal approximation can be used when selection is relatively weak. For intermediate levels of selection a new ‘five-allele’ approximation provides accurate results over a wide range of parameter values. The house-of-cards and five-allele approximations applied to recessive alleles in a diploid population show that, for a given mutation rate, a somewhat larger genetic variance is maintained at equilibrium than in a comparable model of additive alleles. Under directional selection, the increase in genetic variance is largest for alleles of large effect and is much smaller for alleles of intermediate or small effect. At an equilibrium under stabilizing selection, homozygotes would tend to have a higher average fitness than heterozygotes when each mutation has a relatively large effect (the house-of-cards approximation), with the reverse if each mutation has a small effect (the normal approximation).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Barton, N. H. (1986). The maintenance of polygenic variation through a balance between mutation and stabilizing selection. Genetical Research 47, 209216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. (1987). Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance, and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genetical Research (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1971). Protein polymorphism. Nature 234, 410411.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1972). The genetic variability of polygenic characters under optimizing selection, mutation, and drift. Genetical Research 19, 1725.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, W. H. (1979). Equilibrium distributions of continuous polygenic traits. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 36, 148168.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1965). A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 54, 731736.Google Scholar
Kingman, J. F. C. (1978). A simple model for the balance between selection and mutation. Journal of Applied Probability 15, 112.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1975). The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character. Genetical Research 26, 221235.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1980). The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94, 203215.Google Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1960). Natural selection for an intermediate optimum. Australian Journal of Biological Science 13, 3035.Google Scholar
Mitton, J. B. & Grant, M. C. (1984). Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostatis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15, 479499.Google Scholar
Smouse, P. E. (1986). The fitness consequences of multiplelocus heterozygosity under the multiplicative overdominance and inbreeding depression models. Evolution 40, 946957.Google ScholarPubMed
Turelli, M. (1984). Heritable genetic variation via mutation–selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theoretical Population Biology 25, 138193.Google Scholar
Turelli, M. (1985). Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation–selection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics 111, 165195.Google Scholar
Zeng, Z.-B. & Hill, W. G. (1986). The selection limit due to the conflict between truncation and stabilizing selection with mutation. Genetics 114, 13131328.Google Scholar