Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:59:31.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression in heterozygous kangaroo embryos and extra-embryonic membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

P. G. Johnston  and
E. S. Robinson
P. G. Johnston
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, 2113, Australia
E. S. Robinson
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, 2113, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The electrophoretic expression of the X-linked enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase was examined in heterozygous Macropus robustus embryos and their extra-embryonic membranes. The amnion and allantois, like the somatic tissues of the embryo proper, showed paternal X inactivation while the avascular and vascular yolk sac cells showed evidence of activity of both maternal and paternal alleles.

Type
Short Paper
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 205 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Calaby, J. H. & Poole, W. E. (1971). Keeping kangaroos in captivity. International Zoo Yearbook 11, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. W., Johnston, P. G., Murtagh, C. E., Sharman, G. B., Vandeberg, J. L. & Poole, W. E. (1975). Sex-linked isozymes and sex chromosome evolution and inactivation in kangaroos. In Isozymes. Vol. III. Developmental Biology (ed. Markert, C. L.), pp. 559–573. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heap, R. B., Renfree, M. B. & Burton, R. D. (1980). Steroid metabolism in the yolk sac placenta and endometrium of the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii. Journal of Endocrinology 87, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, P. G., Sharman, G. B., James, E. A. & Cooper, D. W. (1978). Studies on metatherian sex chromosomes. VII. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression in tissues and cultured fibroblasts of kangaroos. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 31, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillegraven, J. A. (1976). Biological considerations of the marsupial-placental dichotomy. Evolution 29, 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, M. F. (1972). X-chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals. Biological Reviews 47, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, A., Fosten, M. & Monk, M. (1983). X-chromosome inactivation mosaicism in the three germ layers and the germ line of the mouse embryo. Journal of Embryology and experimental Morphology 74, 207–220.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharman, G. B. (1961). The embryonic membranes and placentation in five genera of diprotodont marsupials. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 137, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. (1975). Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256, 640–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wake, N., Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. (1976). Non-random inactivation of X-chromosome in the rat yolk sac. Nature 262, 580–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, J. D. (1982). X chromosome expression during mouse embryogenesis. In Genetic Control of Gamete Production and function pp. 49–92. Proceedings of the Serono Clinical Colloquia on Reproduction, no. 3. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
West, J. D., Frels, W. I., Chapman, V. M. & Papaioannou, V. E. (1977). Preferential expression of the maternally derived X chromosome in the mouse yolk sac. Cell 12, 873–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandeberg, J. L., Cooper, D. W. & Sharman, G. B. (1977). Studies on metatherian sex chromosomes. V. Activity of the paternally derived allele at the X linked Pgk-A locus in some tissues of kangaroos Macropus giganteus and M. parryi. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 30, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar