Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:32:55.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic differences between two substrains of the inbred 101 mouse strain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

John D. West ,
Josephine Peters  and
Mary F. Lyon
John D. West
Affiliation:
MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon 0X11 ORD, England
Josephine Peters
Affiliation:
MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon 0X11 ORD, England
Mary F. Lyon
Affiliation:
MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, Didcot, Oxon 0X11 ORD, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two substrains of the inbred mouse strain 101, maintained at Harwell and at Neuherberg, and designated 101/H and 101/E1, differed at five of the eight genetic loci tested and it seems very likely that one of these substrains has been genetically contaminated. The available evidence suggests that 101/E1 is probably the contaminated substrain.

Type
Short Papers
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 343 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, D. M. (1978). Sources of subline divergence and their relative importance for sublines of six major inbred strains of mice. In Origins of Inbred Mice (ed. Morse, H. C. III), pp. 197–215. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehling, U. H., Favor, J., Kratochvilova, J. & Neuhäuser-Klaus, A. (1982). Dominant cataract mutations and specific locus mutations in mice induced by radiation or ethylnitrosourea. Mutation Research 92, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eicher, E. M. & Washburn, L. L. (1978). Assignment of genes to regions of mouse chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 75, 946–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favor, J. (1983). A comparison of the dominant cataract and recessive specific-locus mutation rates induced by treatment of male mice with ethylnitrosourea. Mutation Research 110, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festing, M. F. W. (1979). Inbred Strains in Biomedical Research, pp. 483. London and Basingstoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, B., Auerbach, R., Alter, B. J. & Bach, F. H. (1982). Histocompatibility and isoenzyme differences in commercially supplied ‘BALB/c’ mice. Science 217, 379–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kratochvilova, J. & Ehling, U. H. (1979). Dominant cataract mutations induced by γ-irradiation of male mice. Mutation Research 63, 221–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loutit, J. F., Peters, J. & Marshall, M. J. (1981). Colony forming units and haematopoietic stem cells in osteoclastopoiesis. Metabolic Bone Disease and Related Research 3, 131–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A. & Tait, A. (1969). Cytoplasmic isocitrate dehydrogenase variation within the C3H inbred strain. Genetical Research 14, 93–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IIIMorse, H. C. (1978). Differences among sublines of inbred mouse strains. In Origins of Inbred mice (ed. Morse, H. C. III), pp. 441–444. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roderick, T. H. (1978). Further information on subline differences. In Origins of Inbred Mice (ed. Morse, H. D. III), pp. 485–494. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roderick, T. H., Staats, J. & Womack, J. E. (1981). Strain distribution of polymorphic loci. In Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse (ed. Green, M. C.), pp. 377–396. Stuttgart and New York: Fischer.Google Scholar
Russell, L. B., Russell, W. L., Popp, R. A., Vaughan, C. & Jacobson, K. B. (1976). Radiation-induced mutations at mouse hemoglobin loci. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 73, 2843–2846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staats, J. (1980). Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: seventh listing. Cancer Research 40, 2083–2128.Google ScholarPubMed
Surkova, N. I. & Malashenko, A. M. (1977). Genetic control of mutability in laboratory mice. I. Genetic analysis of the sensitivity of mice of the lines 101/H and C57BL/6 with a mutagenic effect of thio-TEPA. Soviet Genetics 13, 1057–1062.Google ScholarPubMed
West, J. D. & Green, J. F. (1983). The transition from oocyte-coded to embryo-coded glucose phosphate isomerase in the early mouse embryo. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 78, 127–140.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitney, J. B. (1978). Simplified typing of mouse hemoglobin (Hbb) phenotypes using cystamine. Biochemical Genetics 16, 667–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, J. B., Copland, G. T., Skow, L. C. & Russell, E. S. (1979). Resolution of the products of the duplicated hemoglobin α-chain loci by isoelectric focusing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76, 867–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed